e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-12378
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Virginia
|
|
54-1394360 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500
Reston, Virginia 20190
(703) 956-4000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
(Not Applicable)
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 29, 2009 there were 5,937,959 total shares of common stock outstanding.
NVR, Inc.
Form 10-Q
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,114,581 |
|
|
$ |
1,146,426 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
259,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
9,015 |
|
|
|
11,594 |
|
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots and housing units, covered under
sales agreements with customers |
|
|
415,104 |
|
|
|
335,238 |
|
Unsold lots and housing units |
|
|
59,370 |
|
|
|
57,639 |
|
Manufacturing materials and other |
|
|
4,365 |
|
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478,839 |
|
|
|
400,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
32,326 |
|
|
|
29,073 |
|
Consolidated assets not owned |
|
|
57,461 |
|
|
|
114,930 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
20,624 |
|
|
|
25,658 |
|
Reorganization value in excess of amounts
allocable to identifiable assets, net |
|
|
41,580 |
|
|
|
41,580 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
231,968 |
|
|
|
242,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,245,800 |
|
|
|
2,012,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale, net |
|
|
110,095 |
|
|
|
72,488 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
Reorganization value in excess of amounts
allocable to identifiable assets, net |
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
7,347 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,904 |
|
|
|
8,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,980 |
|
|
|
90,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,374,780 |
|
|
$ |
2,103,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
(Continued)
3
NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
150,304 |
|
|
$ |
137,285 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
198,106 |
|
|
|
194,869 |
|
Liabilities related to consolidated assets not owned |
|
|
52,896 |
|
|
|
109,439 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
66,819 |
|
|
|
59,623 |
|
Other term debt |
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
133,370 |
|
|
|
163,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603,789 |
|
|
|
667,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
23,797 |
|
|
|
17,842 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
75,607 |
|
|
|
44,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,404 |
|
|
|
62,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
703,193 |
|
|
|
729,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 60,000,000
shares authorized; 20,559,671 and
20,561,187
shares issued as of September 30, 2009
and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
810,132 |
|
|
|
722,265 |
|
Deferred compensation trust 265,278 and
514,470 shares of NVR, Inc. common
stock as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
(40,799 |
) |
|
|
(74,978 |
) |
Deferred compensation liability |
|
|
40,799 |
|
|
|
74,978 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,762,428 |
|
|
|
3,630,887 |
|
Less treasury stock at cost 14,632,950 and
15,028,335 shares at September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
(2,901,179 |
) |
|
|
(2,979,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,671,587 |
|
|
|
1,373,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders
equity |
|
$ |
2,374,780 |
|
|
$ |
2,103,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
792,510 |
|
|
$ |
928,265 |
|
|
$ |
1,953,327 |
|
|
$ |
2,739,167 |
|
Other income |
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
6,511 |
|
|
|
14,356 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(636,642 |
) |
|
|
(805,931 |
) |
|
|
(1,593,512 |
) |
|
|
(2,305,231 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
(56,662 |
) |
|
|
(66,796 |
) |
|
|
(171,020 |
) |
|
|
(240,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
101,428 |
|
|
|
59,794 |
|
|
|
195,306 |
|
|
|
207,459 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,802 |
) |
|
|
(3,259 |
) |
|
|
(8,038 |
) |
|
|
(9,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding income |
|
|
98,626 |
|
|
|
56,535 |
|
|
|
187,268 |
|
|
|
197,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking fees |
|
|
21,506 |
|
|
|
10,946 |
|
|
|
44,719 |
|
|
|
43,698 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
Other income |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
(7,486 |
) |
|
|
(7,761 |
) |
|
|
(19,719 |
) |
|
|
(23,823 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(921 |
) |
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
14,814 |
|
|
|
4,072 |
|
|
|
26,619 |
|
|
|
22,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
113,440 |
|
|
|
60,607 |
|
|
|
213,887 |
|
|
|
220,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(41,313 |
) |
|
|
(24,056 |
) |
|
|
(82,346 |
) |
|
|
(88,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
72,127 |
|
|
$ |
36,551 |
|
|
$ |
131,541 |
|
|
$ |
131,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
12.29 |
|
|
$ |
6.72 |
|
|
$ |
22.83 |
|
|
$ |
24.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
11.59 |
|
|
$ |
6.12 |
|
|
$ |
21.57 |
|
|
$ |
22.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic average shares outstanding |
|
|
5,866 |
|
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
|
5,762 |
|
|
|
5,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average shares outstanding |
|
|
6,223 |
|
|
|
5,968 |
|
|
|
6,098 |
|
|
|
5,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
131,541 |
|
|
$ |
131,349 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,696 |
|
|
|
10,712 |
|
Stock option compensation expense |
|
|
34,848 |
|
|
|
29,716 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
(58,656 |
) |
|
|
(37,927 |
) |
Contract land deposit impairments (recoveries) |
|
|
(5,705 |
) |
|
|
55,248 |
|
Mortgage loans closed |
|
|
(1,427,100 |
) |
|
|
(1,496,365 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans |
|
|
1,420,515 |
|
|
|
1,516,144 |
|
Principal payments on mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
3,591 |
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
|
(32,242 |
) |
Net change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in inventories |
|
|
(78,269 |
) |
|
|
77,834 |
|
Decrease in receivables |
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
Decrease in contract land deposits |
|
|
2,665 |
|
|
|
5,423 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable,
customer deposits and accrued expenses |
|
|
88,283 |
|
|
|
(54,013 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
10,997 |
|
|
|
5,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
95,936 |
|
|
|
215,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities, net |
|
|
(259,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
(5,080 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(260,199 |
) |
|
|
(3,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings under notes payable, and other
term debt |
|
|
30,832 |
|
|
|
7,129 |
|
Repurchase of senior notes |
|
|
(29,950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
58,656 |
|
|
|
37,927 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
72,753 |
|
|
|
44,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
132,291 |
|
|
|
89,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(31,972 |
) |
|
|
300,832 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
1,147,643 |
|
|
|
664,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
1,115,671 |
|
|
$ |
965,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the period |
|
$ |
6,017 |
|
|
$ |
6,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
$ |
(33,584 |
) |
|
$ |
56,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net consolidated assets not owned |
|
$ |
(926 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of NVR, Inc. (NVR or the Company) and its subsidiaries and certain other entities in which the
Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary (see note 2 to the accompanying financial
statements). Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The
statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
complete financial statements. Because the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP, they should be
read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2008
Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring accruals except as otherwise noted herein) considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2009.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. We have evaluated all subsequent events through November 3,
2009, the date the financial statements were issued.
For the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, comprehensive income
equaled net income; therefore, a separate statement of comprehensive income is not included in the
accompanying financial statements.
2. Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is required to consolidate that entity
in its financial statements. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the party
that absorbs a majority of the entitys expected losses, receives a majority of the entitys
expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual, or other financial
interests in the entity. Expected losses are the expected negative variability in the fair value
of an entitys net assets, exclusive of its variable interest, and expected residual returns are
the expected positive variability in the fair value of an entitys net assets, exclusive of its
variable interests. As discussed below, NVR evaluates these provisions as it relates to its
finished lot acquisition strategy.
NVR does not engage in the land development business. Instead, the Company typically
acquires finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under fixed
price purchase agreements. The purchase agreements require deposits that may be forfeited if NVR
fails to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in
the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts, and typically range up to 10% of the
aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. As of September 30, 2009, the Company controlled
approximately 43,700 lots with deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately
$162,500 and $5,500, respectively. See note 3 for further discussion of contract land deposits.
NVR believes this lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks
associated with direct land ownership and land development. NVR may, at its option, choose for any
reason and at any time not to perform under these purchase agreements by delivering notice of its
intent not to acquire the finished
7
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
lots under contract. NVRs sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under
these purchase agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidated damage
provisions contained within the purchase agreements. In other words, if NVR does not perform under
a purchase agreement, NVR loses only its deposit. NVR does not have any financial or specific
performance guarantees, or completion obligations, under these purchase agreements, with the
exception of two specific performance contracts pursuant to which the Company is committed to
purchasing approximately seventeen finished lots at an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$2,200. None of the creditors of any of the development entities with which NVR enters fixed price
purchase agreements have recourse to the general credit of NVR. Except as described below, NVR
also does not share in an allocation of either the profit earned or loss incurred by any of these
entities.
On a limited basis, NVR makes investments in joint venture limited liability corporations
(LLCs) for the purpose of obtaining finished lots All LLCs are structured such that NVR is a
non-controlling member and is at risk only for the amount invested by the Company. The Company has
additional funding commitments totaling $4,000 to one LLC should additional investment be required.
NVR is not a borrower, guarantor or obligor of any of the LLCs debt. NVR enters into a standard
fixed price purchase agreement to purchase lots from the LLCs. NVR recognizes its share of
earnings of the LLCs as an adjustment of the cost basis of the lots at the time that the lot and
related home is settled with an external customer. At September 30, 2009, NVR had an aggregate
investment in eleven separate LLCs totaling approximately $26,100, which is included in Other
assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. This investment was offset by a valuation
reserve of approximately $4,100 as of September 30, 2009 attributable to investments in certain
LLCs that the Company determined were not fully recoverable.
Forward contracts, such as the fixed price purchase agreements utilized by NVR to acquire
finished lot inventory, are deemed to be variable interests. Therefore, the development entities
with which NVR enters fixed price purchase agreements, including the LLCs, are examined for
possible consolidation by NVR. NVR has developed a methodology to determine whether it, or
conversely, the owner(s) of the applicable development entity is the primary beneficiary of a
development entity. The methodology used to evaluate NVRs primary beneficiary status requires
substantial management judgment and estimation. These judgments and estimates involve assigning
probabilities to various estimated cash flow possibilities relative to the development entitys
expected profits and losses and the cash flows associated with changes in the fair value of
finished lots under contract. Although management believes that its accounting policy is designed
to properly assess NVRs primary beneficiary status relative to its involvement with the
development entities from which NVR acquires finished lots, changes to the probabilities and the
cash flow possibilities used in NVRs evaluation could produce widely different conclusions
regarding whether NVR is or is not a development entitys primary beneficiary.
The Company has evaluated all of its fixed price purchase agreements and LLC arrangements and
has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of eighteen of those development entities with
which the agreements and arrangements are held. As a result, at September 30, 2009, NVR has
consolidated such development entities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Where NVR deemed itself to be the primary beneficiary of a development entity created after
December 31, 2003 and the development entity refused to provide financial statements, NVR utilized
estimation techniques to perform the consolidation. The effect of the consolidation at September
30, 2009 was the inclusion on the balance sheet of $57,461 as Consolidated assets not owned, with
a corresponding inclusion of $52,896 as Liabilities related to consolidated assets not owned,
after elimination of intercompany items. Inclusive in these totals were assets of approximately
$23,000 and liabilities of approximately $23,000 estimated for seven development entities created
after December 31, 2003 that did not provide financial statements.
8
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
Following is the consolidating schedule at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NVR, Inc. |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Entities Not |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,114,581 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,114,581 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
259,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,406 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
9,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,015 |
|
Homebuilding inventory |
|
|
478,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478,839 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
20,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,624 |
|
Reorganization value in excess of amount
allocable to identifiable assets, net |
|
|
41,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,580 |
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
32,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
32,326 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
235,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,979 |
) |
|
|
231,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,192,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,565 |
) |
|
|
2,188,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking assets: |
|
|
128,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated entities not owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land under development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,153 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,321,884 |
|
|
$ |
57,461 |
|
|
$ |
(4,565 |
) |
|
$ |
2,374,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other liabilities |
|
$ |
348,410 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
348,410 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
66,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,819 |
|
Other term debt |
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
133,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking liabilities: |
|
|
99,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated entities not owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,405 |
|
|
|
4,522 |
|
|
|
16,927 |
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,969 |
|
Contract land deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,586 |
|
|
|
(4,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advances from NVR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
(4,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,461 |
|
|
|
(4,565 |
) |
|
|
52,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
1,671,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,671,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,321,884 |
|
|
$ |
57,461 |
|
|
$ |
(4,565 |
) |
|
$ |
2,374,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
3. Contract Land Deposits
During the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized the
pre-tax recovery of approximately $1,000 and $5,700, respectively, of contract land deposits
previously determined to be uncollectible. During the three and nine-month periods ended September
30, 2008, the Company incurred pre-tax impairment charges on contract land deposits of
approximately $42,800, and $55,200, respectively. The contract land deposit asset is shown net of
a $129,600 and $147,900 impairment valuation allowance at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
4. Earnings per Share
The following weighted average shares and share equivalents are used to calculate basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Basic weighted average number of
shares outstanding |
|
|
5,866,000 |
|
|
|
5,438,000 |
|
|
|
5,762,000 |
|
|
|
5,340,000 |
|
Shares issuable upon exercise
of dilutive options |
|
|
357,000 |
|
|
|
530,000 |
|
|
|
336,000 |
|
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average number of
shares outstanding |
|
|
6,223,000 |
|
|
|
5,968,000 |
|
|
|
6,098,000 |
|
|
|
5,915,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumed proceeds used in the treasury method for calculating NVRs diluted earnings
per share includes the amount the employee must pay upon exercise, the amount of compensation cost
attributed to future services and not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that would be
credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of the option. The assumed amount
credited to additional paid-in capital equals the tax benefit from assumed exercise after
consideration of the intrinsic value upon assumed exercise less the actual stock-based compensation
expense to be recognized in the income statement from 2006 and future periods.
Options to purchase 45,053 and 317,322 shares of common stock during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, and options to purchase 319,617 shares of common stock during both the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. In addition, 377,386
performance-based options were outstanding as of September 30, 2008 that were excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share because the performance target had not been achieved.
The performance target was not met at December 31, 2008 and all of the performance-based options
outstanding at that time expired unexercisable.
5. Marketable Securities
As of September 30, 2009 the Company held marketable securities totaling $259,406. These
securities, which are debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government
corporations and agencies, are classified by the Company as held-to-maturity, are measured at
amortized cost and mature within one year.
10
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
6. Excess Reorganization Value
Reorganization value in excess of identifiable assets (excess reorganization value) is an
indefinite life intangible asset that was created upon NVRs emergence from bankruptcy on September
30, 1993. Based on the allocation of the reorganization value, the portion of the reorganization
value which was not attributed to specific tangible or intangible assets has been reported as
excess reorganization value, which is treated similarly to goodwill. Excess reorganization value
is not subject to amortization. Rather, excess reorganization value is subject to an impairment
assessment on an annual basis or more frequently if changes in events or circumstances indicate
that impairment may have occurred. Because excess reorganization value was based on the
reorganization value of NVRs entire enterprise upon bankruptcy emergence, the impairment
assessment is conducted on an enterprise basis based on the comparison of NVRs total equity
compared to the market value of NVRs outstanding publicly-traded common stock. The Company
completed the annual assessment of impairment during the first quarter of 2009, and as of September
30, 2009, management believes that there was no impairment of excess reorganization value.
7. Uncertainty in Income Taxes
As of January 1, 2009, the Company had approximately $53,339 (on a net basis) of unrecognized
tax benefits, which would decrease income tax expense if recognized. The Company recognizes
interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in the income tax expense line. As of January 1,
2009, the Company had a total of $5,150 of accrued interest for unrecognized tax benefits on its
balance sheet. Based on its historical experience in dealing with various taxing authorities, the
Company has found that generally it is the administrative practice of these authorities to not seek
penalties from the Company for the tax positions it has taken on its returns, related to its
unrecognized tax benefits. Therefore, the Company does not accrue penalties for the positions in
which it has an unrecognized tax benefit. However, if such penalties were to be accrued, they would
be recorded as a component of income tax expense. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer
subject to income tax examinations for years prior to 2006.
8. Shareholders Equity
A summary of changes in shareholders equity is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Treasury |
|
Comp. |
|
Comp. |
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Stock |
|
Trust |
|
Liability |
|
Total |
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
722,265 |
|
|
$ |
3,630,887 |
|
|
$ |
(2,979,569 |
) |
|
$ |
(74,978 |
) |
|
$ |
74,978 |
|
|
$ |
1,373,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,541 |
|
Deferred compensation activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,179 |
|
|
|
(34,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,848 |
|
Stock option activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,753 |
|
Tax benefit from stock-based
compensation activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,656 |
|
Treasury shares issued
upon option exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
810,132 |
|
|
$ |
3,762,428 |
|
|
$ |
(2,901,179 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,799 |
) |
|
$ |
40,799 |
|
|
$ |
1,671,587 |
|
|
|
|
The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. The Company settles option exercises by issuing shares of treasury stock
to option holders. Shares are relieved from the treasury account based on the weighted average
cost basis of treasury
11
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
shares acquired. Approximately 395,000 options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock
were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
9. Product Warranties
The Company establishes warranty and product liability reserves (warranty reserve) to
provide for estimated future expenses as a result of construction and product defects, product
recalls and litigation incidental to NVRs homebuilding business. Liability estimates are
determined based on managements judgment, considering such factors as historical experience, the
likely current cost of corrective action, manufacturers and subcontractors participation in
sharing the cost of corrective action, consultations with third party experts such as engineers,
and discussions with our general counsel and outside counsel retained to handle specific product
liability cases. The following table reflects the changes in the Companys warranty reserve during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Warranty reserve, beginning of
period |
|
$ |
60,858 |
|
|
$ |
69,750 |
|
|
$ |
68,084 |
|
|
$ |
70,284 |
|
Provision |
|
|
11,154 |
|
|
|
9,827 |
|
|
|
18,806 |
|
|
|
26,816 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(9,376 |
) |
|
|
(11,048 |
) |
|
|
(24,254 |
) |
|
|
(28,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve, end of period |
|
$ |
62,636 |
|
|
$ |
68,529 |
|
|
$ |
62,636 |
|
|
$ |
68,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Segment Disclosures
The following disclosure includes four homebuilding reportable segments that aggregate
geographically the Companys homebuilding operating segments, and the mortgage banking
operations presented as a single reportable segment. The homebuilding reportable segments are
comprised of operating divisions in the following geographic areas:
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware
Homebuilding North East New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania
Homebuilding Mid East Kentucky, New York, Ohio, western Pennsylvania and Indiana
Homebuilding South East North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida and Tennessee
Homebuilding profit before tax includes all revenues and income generated from the sale of
homes, less the cost of homes sold, selling, general and administrative expenses, and a corporate
capital allocation charge. The corporate capital allocation charge eliminates in consolidation,
is based on the segments average net assets employed, and is charged using a consistent
methodology in the years presented. The corporate capital allocation charged to the operating
segment allows the Chief Operating Decision Maker to determine whether the operating segments
results are providing the desired rate of return after covering the Companys cost of capital.
The Company records charges on contract land deposits when it is determined that it is probable
that recovery of the deposit is impaired. For segment reporting purposes, impairments on
contract land deposits are charged to the operating segment upon the determination to terminate a
finished lot purchase agreement with the developer, or to restructure a lot purchase agreement
resulting in the forfeiture of the deposit. Mortgage banking profit before tax consists of
revenues generated from mortgage financing, title insurance and closing services, less the costs
of such services and general and administrative costs. Mortgage banking operations are not
charged a capital allocation charge.
In addition to the corporate capital allocation and contract land deposit impairments
discussed above, the other reconciling items between segment profit and consolidated profit
before tax include
12
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
unallocated corporate overhead (including all management incentive compensation), stock option
compensation expense, consolidation adjustments and external corporate interest expense.
NVRs overhead functions, such as accounting, treasury, human resources, etc., are centrally
performed and the costs are not allocated to the Companys operating segments. Consolidation
adjustments consist of such items necessary to convert the reportable segments results, which
are predominantly maintained on a cash basis, to a full accrual basis for external financial
statement presentation purposes, and are not allocated to the Companys operating segments.
Likewise, stock option compensation expense is not charged to the operating segments.
External corporate interest expense is primarily comprised of interest charges on the
Companys outstanding Senior Notes and working capital line borrowings, and is not charged to
the operating segments because the charges are included in the corporate capital allocation
discussed above.
Following are tables presenting revenues, segment profit and segment assets for each
reportable segment, with reconciliations to the amounts reported for the consolidated
enterprise, where applicable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
491,669 |
|
|
$ |
531,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,212,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,617,708 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
74,563 |
|
|
|
80,695 |
|
|
|
185,081 |
|
|
|
265,474 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
156,281 |
|
|
|
182,324 |
|
|
|
362,373 |
|
|
|
487,253 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
69,997 |
|
|
|
133,795 |
|
|
|
193,088 |
|
|
|
368,732 |
|
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
21,506 |
|
|
|
10,946 |
|
|
|
44,719 |
|
|
|
43,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues |
|
$ |
814,016 |
|
|
$ |
939,211 |
|
|
$ |
1,998,046 |
|
|
$ |
2,782,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
71,919 |
|
|
$ |
45,668 |
|
|
$ |
150,804 |
|
|
$ |
132,395 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
7,156 |
|
|
|
5,173 |
|
|
|
15,479 |
|
|
|
17,014 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
18,225 |
|
|
|
17,622 |
|
|
|
30,970 |
|
|
|
37,093 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
10,578 |
|
|
|
9,344 |
|
|
|
27,220 |
|
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
15,515 |
|
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
|
28,724 |
|
|
|
24,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
|
115,685 |
|
|
|
83,815 |
|
|
|
235,321 |
|
|
|
238,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract land deposit impairments
(1) |
|
|
6,841 |
|
|
|
(40,014 |
) |
|
|
17,302 |
|
|
|
(24,575 |
) |
Stock option expense (2) |
|
|
(11,446 |
) |
|
|
(11,284 |
) |
|
|
(34,848 |
) |
|
|
(29,716 |
) |
Corporate capital allocation (3) |
|
|
17,003 |
|
|
|
27,395 |
|
|
|
47,398 |
|
|
|
83,599 |
|
Unallocated corporate overhead (4) |
|
|
(10,017 |
) |
|
|
(5,447 |
) |
|
|
(34,348 |
) |
|
|
(51,601 |
) |
Consolidation adjustments and
other (5) |
|
|
(1,920 |
) |
|
|
9,260 |
|
|
|
(9,190 |
) |
|
|
13,827 |
|
Corporate interest expense |
|
|
(2,706 |
) |
|
|
(3,118 |
) |
|
|
(7,748 |
) |
|
|
(9,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items sub-total |
|
|
(2,245 |
) |
|
|
(23,208 |
) |
|
|
(21,434 |
) |
|
|
(17,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income before tax |
|
$ |
113,440 |
|
|
$ |
60,607 |
|
|
$ |
213,887 |
|
|
$ |
220,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
471,449 |
|
|
$ |
615,586 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
56,637 |
|
|
|
79,328 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
108,451 |
|
|
|
128,853 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
52,223 |
|
|
|
100,728 |
|
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
121,633 |
|
|
|
124,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
|
810,393 |
|
|
|
1,048,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated assets not owned |
|
|
57,461 |
|
|
|
127,074 |
|
Cash |
|
|
1,114,581 |
|
|
|
963,313 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
259,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
193,460 |
|
|
|
214,456 |
|
Intangible assets (6) |
|
|
48,927 |
|
|
|
60,634 |
|
Contract land deposit and
LLCs reserve |
|
|
(136,154 |
) |
|
|
(145,294 |
) |
Consolidation adjustments and
other |
|
|
26,706 |
|
|
|
39,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items sub-total |
|
|
1,564,387 |
|
|
|
1,259,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated assets |
|
$ |
2,374,780 |
|
|
$ |
2,308,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This item represents changes to the contract land deposit impairment reserve, which is
not allocated to the reportable segments. During the 2009 quarter and year to date
periods, unallocated reserves decreased as a result of charging previously reserved land
impairments to the operating segments, and to certain recoveries of deposits previously
determined to be impaired. |
|
(2) |
|
The year to date variance is attributable to an adjustment made to the estimated
forfeiture rate used in the calculation of stock option expense in the first quarter of
2008. This resulted in the one-time reversal of approximately $4,800 of stock option
expense in the first quarter of 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
This item represents the elimination of the corporate capital allocation charge
included in the respective homebuilding reportable segments. The decreases in the
corporate capital allocation charge are due to the lower segment asset balances during the
respective periods due to the decreases in operating activity period over period. The
corporate capital allocation charge is based on the segments monthly average asset
balance, and is as follows for the periods presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Homebuilding Mid
Atlantic |
|
$ |
11,341 |
|
|
$ |
18,334 |
|
|
$ |
31,351 |
|
|
$ |
56,044 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
7,795 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
|
6,690 |
|
|
|
9,897 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
9,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,003 |
|
|
$ |
27,395 |
|
|
$ |
47,398 |
|
|
$ |
83,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The year to date decrease in unallocated corporate overhead is primarily driven by a
reduction in management incentive costs and reduced personnel and other overhead costs as
part of our focus to size our organization to meet current activity levels. |
|
(5) |
|
The decrease in consolidation adjustments and other is primarily due to production
volume increases period over period, as well as to a decrease in interest income earned
related to lower interest rates in 2009 as compared to 2008. |
14
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
(6) |
|
The decrease is attributable to the fourth quarter 2008 write-off of goodwill and
indefinite life intangible assets related to the Companys acquisitions of Rymarc Homes and
Fox Ridge Homes. |
11. Fair Value
Financial Instruments
Except as otherwise noted here, NVR believes that insignificant differences exist between
the carrying value and the fair value of its financial instruments. The estimated fair value
of NVRs 5% Senior Notes due 2010 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $135,133
and $161,937, respectively. The estimated fair value is based on a quoted market price. The
carrying value was $133,370 and $163,320 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
Derivative Instruments and Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
In the normal course of business, NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (NVRM), NVRs mortgage banking
segment, enters into contractual commitments to extend credit to homebuyers with fixed expiration
dates. The commitments become effective when the borrowers lock-in a specified interest rate
within time frames established by NVR. All mortgagors are evaluated for credit worthiness prior to
the extension of the commitment. Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the
time of the lock-in of rates by the borrower and the sale date of the loan to a broker/dealer.
To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock
commitments to borrowers, the Company enters into optional or mandatory delivery forward sale
contracts to sell whole loans and mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers. The forward sale
contracts lock in an interest rate and price for the sale of loans similar to the specific rate
lock commitments. NVR does not engage in speculative or trading derivative activities. Both the
rate lock commitments to borrowers and the forward sale contracts to broker/dealers are
undesignated derivatives and, accordingly, are marked to fair value through earnings. At September
30, 2009, there were contractual commitments to extend credit to borrowers aggregating
approximately $239,000 and open forward delivery contracts aggregating approximately $269,000.
GAAP assigns a fair value hierarchy to the inputs used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs
are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Level 2 inputs are
inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs. The fair value of the Companys rate lock commitments to borrowers and
the related input levels includes, as applicable:
|
i) |
|
the assumed gain/loss of the expected resultant loan sale (level 2); |
|
|
ii) |
|
the effects of interest rate movements between the date of the rate lock and
the balance sheet date (level 2); and |
|
|
iii) |
|
the value of the servicing rights associated with the loan (level 2). |
The assumed gain/loss considers the amount that the Company has discounted the price to the
borrower from par for competitive reasons and the excess servicing to be received or buydown fees
to be paid upon securitization of the loan. The excess servicing and buydown fees are calculated
pursuant to contractual terms with investors. To calculate the effects of interest rate movements,
the Company utilizes applicable published mortgage-backed security prices, and multiplies the price
movement between the rate lock date and the balance sheet date by the notional loan commitment
amount. The Company sells all of its loans on a servicing released basis, and receives a servicing
released premium upon sale. Thus, the value of the servicing rights, which averaged 167 basis
points of the loan amount as of September 30, 2009, is included in the fair value measurement and
is based upon contractual terms with investors and varies depending on the loan type. The Company
assumes an approximate 17% fallout rate when measuring the fair value of rate lock
15
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
commitments. Fallout is defined as locked loan commitments for which the Company does not
close a mortgage loan and is based on historical experience.
The fair value of the Companys forward sales contracts to broker/dealers solely considers the
market price movement of the same type of security between the trade date and the balance sheet
date (level 2). The market price changes are multiplied by the notional amount of the forward
sales contracts to measure the fair value.
Mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at fair value when closed, and thereafter are
carried at the lower of cost or fair value until sale. The fair value of loans held-for-sale of
$110,095 included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet exceeds its aggregate
principal balance of $107,835 by $2,260.
The undesignated derivative instruments are included in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Derivative Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate Lock Commitments |
|
NVRM Other assets |
|
$ |
3,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Sales Contracts |
|
NVRM Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
$ |
1,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized gain or loss from the change in the fair value measurements is included in
earnings as a component of mortgage banking fees in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of income as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
|
Notional or |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Security |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
From Loan |
|
|
Movement |
|
|
Rights |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Sale |
|
|
Effect |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Rate lock
commitments |
|
$ |
238,797 |
|
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
|
$ |
3,301 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,469 |
|
Forward sales
contracts |
|
$ |
268,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,523 |
) |
|
|
(1,523 |
) |
Mortgages held for
sale |
|
$ |
107,835 |
|
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value
Measurement,
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,306 |
) |
|
|
1,924 |
|
|
|
5,111 |
|
|
|
(1,523 |
) |
|
|
4,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Fair Value
Measurement,
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
2,021 |
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value
Adjustment for the
period ended
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(109 |
) |
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
$ |
3,286 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value measurement will be impacted in the future by the change in the value of
the servicing rights and the volume and product mix of the Companys locked loan commitments.
16
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
12. Debt
On August 5, 2009, NVRM renewed its Master Repurchase Agreement dated August 5, 2008 with U.S.
Bank National Association, as Agent and representative of itself as a Buyer, and the other Buyers
thereto (the Master Repurchase Agreement) pursuant to a First Amendment to Master Repurchase
Agreement with U.S. Bank National Association, as Agent and representative of itself as Buyer
(Agent), and the other Buyers thereto (together with the Master Repurchase Agreement, the
Amended Repurchase Agreement). The purpose of the Amended Repurchase Agreement is to finance the
origination of mortgage loans by NVRM. The Amended Repurchase Agreement provides for loan
purchases up to $100 million, subject to certain sublimits. In addition, the Amended Repurchase
Agreement provides for an accordion feature under which NVRM may request that the aggregate
commitments under the Repurchase Agreement be increased to an amount up to $125 million. The
Amended Repurchase Agreement expires on August 3, 2010.
At September 30, 2009, there was $75,607 outstanding under the Amended Repurchase
Agreement, which is included in liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets. Amounts outstanding under the Amended Repurchase Agreement are collateralized by the
Companys mortgage loans held for sale, which are included in assets in the September 30, 2009
balance sheet in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. As of
September 30, 2009, there were no aggregate outstanding purchase price limitations reducing
the amount available to NVRM. There are several restrictions on purchased loans, including
that they cannot be sold to others, they cannot be pledged to anyone other than the agent, and
they cannot support any other borrowing or repurchase agreement.
On August 4, 2009, NVR, Inc., as borrower (NVR), entered into an amendment to its $600
million revolving credit agreement with the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent (the Facility), to reduce the total available borrowings under the Facility
to $300 million, to eliminate the accordion feature and to amend or eliminate certain non-financial
covenants. The Facilitys termination date was unaffected by the amendment and remains December 6,
2010. At September 30, 2009, there were no borrowings under the Facility.
On August 4, 2009 NVR repurchased $2,000 of its 5% Senior Notes due June 15, 2010 (the
Notes) on the open market at par, reducing the Notes balance at September 30, 2009 to $133,370.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
On July 18, 2007, former and current employees filed lawsuits against the Company in the Court
of Common Pleas in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania and Hamilton County, Ohio, in Superior Court in
Durham County, North Carolina, and in the Circuit Court in Montgomery County, Maryland, and on July
19, 2007 in the Superior Court in New Jersey, alleging that the Company incorrectly classified its
sales and marketing representatives as being exempt from overtime wages. These lawsuits are
similar in nature to another lawsuit filed on October 29, 2004 by another former employee in the
United States District Court for the Western District of New York. The complaints seek injunctive
relief, an award of unpaid wages, including fringe benefits, liquidated damages equal to the
overtime wages allegedly due and not paid, attorney and other fees and interest, and where
available, multiple damages. The suits were filed as purported class actions. However, none of
the groups of employees that the lawsuits purport to represent have been certified as a class. The
lawsuits filed in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland and New Jersey have been stayed pending further
developments in the New York action. Following a status conference on July 14, 2009, the parties
have also agreed to stay the North Carolina action pending final disposition of the New York
action.
17
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
The Company believes that its compensation practices in regard to sales and marketing
representatives are entirely lawful and in compliance with two letter rulings from the United
States Department of Labor (DOL) issued in January 2007. The two courts to most recently
consider similar
claims against other homebuilders have acknowledged the DOLs position that sales and
marketing representatives were properly classified as exempt from overtime wages and the only
court to have directly addressed the exempt status of such employees concluded that the DOLs
position was valid. Accordingly, the Company has vigorously defended and intends to continue
to vigorously defend these lawsuits. Because the Company is unable to determine the
likelihood of an unfavorable outcome of this case, or the amount of damages, if any, the
Company has not recorded any associated liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets.
NVR and its subsidiaries are also involved in various other litigation arising in the
ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, and based on advice of legal
counsel, this litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial
position or results of operations of NVR.
14. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160) [Accounting Standards
Codification ASC 810-10-65]. SFAS No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards
for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest as equity in
the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parents equity. The amount of net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on
the face of the income statement, but deducted to arrive at income available to common
shareholders. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parents ownership interest in a
subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains
its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize
a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be
measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation
date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the
parent and its non controlling interests. SFAS No. 160 was effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2 (FSP No. 157-2) [ASC
820-10-15], Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 which delayed the effective date of SFAS No.
157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008. FSP No. 157-2 became effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption
of FSP No. 157-2 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 [ASC 815-10-15], Disclosures About Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 enhances
the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, regarding an entitys derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 was
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009. The Company conformed its disclosures to the
requirements of SFAS No. 161.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Positions No. FAS 107-1 and No. APB 28-1 (FSP No.
107-1 and APB No. 28-1) [ASC 825-10-65], Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, which enhances the interim disclosures required for the fair value of financial
instruments and requires companies to disclose the methods and assumptions used to estimate the
fair value of financial instruments.
18
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 were effective for the Company
beginning April 1, 2009. The Company conformed its disclosures to the requirements of FSP No.
107-1 and APB No. 28-1.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4 (FSP No. 157-4) [ASC
820-10-65], Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP No.
157-4 clarifies the methodology to be used to determine fair value when there is no active market or where the
price inputs being used represent distressed sales. FSP No. 157-4 also reaffirms the objective of
fair value measurement as stated in SFAS No. 157, which is to reflect how much an asset would be
sold for in an orderly transaction. FSP No. 157-4 was effective for the Company beginning April 1,
2009. The adoption of FSP No. 157-4 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Positions No. FAS 115-2 and No. FAS 124-2, (FSP No.
115-2 and FSP No. 124-2) [ASC 320-10-65], Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment of Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. FSP No. 115-2 and FSP No. 124-2
changes the existing other-than-temporary impairment model for debt securities and expands and
increases the frequency of disclosures for other-than-temporary impairments for debt and equity
securities. It was effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP No.
115-2 and FSP No. 124-2 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165) [ASC 855-10-05],
which establishes the accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. It requires the
disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for
that date. SFAS No. 165 was effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2009. The Company has
conformed its disclosures to the requirements of SFAS No. 165.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
(SFAS No. 166), which changes the conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial
asset as a sale and requires additional year-end and interim disclosures. SFAS No. 166 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The implementation of SFAS No. 166
is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS
No. 167). This statement amends FASB Interpretation 46R related to the consolidation of variable
interest entities (VIEs) and revises the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE
to be more qualitative in nature and requires companies to more frequently reassess whether they
must consolidate a VIE. SFAS No. 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No. 167 on its consolidated
financial statements and results of operations.
In July 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, (SFAS No. 168) [ASC
105-10-05], which supersedes SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which will
become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles recognized
by the FASB. SFAS No. 168 was effective for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009.
19
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and
Results of Operations (dollars in thousands) |
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements in this Form 10-Q, as well as statements made by us in periodic press
releases or other public communications, constitute forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Certain, but not
necessarily all, of such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology, such as believes, expects, may, will, should, or
anticipates or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. All statements other than
of historical facts are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements contained in this
document include those regarding market trends, NVRs financial position, business strategy, the
outcome of pending litigation, projected plans and objectives of management for future operations.
Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
that may cause the actual results or performance of NVR to be materially different from future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such
risk factors include, but are not limited to the following: general economic and business
conditions (on both a national and regional level); interest rate changes; access to suitable
financing by NVR and NVRs customers; competition; the availability and cost of land and other raw
materials used by NVR in its homebuilding operations; shortages of labor; weather related
slow-downs; building moratoriums; governmental regulation; fluctuation and volatility of stock and
other financial markets; mortgage financing availability; and other factors over which NVR has
little or no control. NVR undertakes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.
For additional information regarding risk factors, see Part II, Item 1A of this Report.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to NVR, we, us or our include NVR
and its subsidiaries.
Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Overview
Our primary business is the construction and sale of single-family detached homes,
townhomes and condominium buildings. To more fully serve our homebuilding customers, we also
operate a mortgage banking and title services business. Our homebuilding reportable segments
consist of the following markets:
|
|
|
Mid Atlantic:
|
|
Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia and Delaware |
North East:
|
|
New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania |
Mid East:
|
|
Kentucky, New York, Ohio, western Pennsylvania and Indiana |
South East:
|
|
North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida and Tennessee |
During the third quarter of 2009, we opened new operations in the Orlando, FL, Raleigh, NC and
Indianapolis, IN metropolitan areas. We currently have 2 active communities in the Orlando
market and one active community in the Raleigh market. We expect to open 10 communities in the
Indianapolis market during the fourth quarter.
We believe that we operate our business with a conservative operating strategy. We do not
engage in land development and primarily construct homes on a pre-sold basis. This strategy
allows us to maximize inventory turnover, which we believe enables us to minimize market risk
and to operate with less capital, thereby enhancing rates of return on equity and total capital.
In addition, we focus on
obtaining and maintaining a leading market position in each market we serve. This strategy
allows us
20
to gain valuable efficiencies and competitive advantages in our markets which
management believes contributes to minimizing the adverse effects of regional economic cycles
and provides growth opportunities within these markets.
Because we are not active in the land development business, our continued success is
contingent upon, among other things, our ability to control an adequate supply of finished lots
at current market prices, and on our developers ability to timely deliver finished lots to meet
the sales demands of our customers. We acquire finished lots from various development entities
under fixed price lot purchase agreements (purchase agreements). These purchase agreements
require deposits in the form of cash or letters of credit that may be forfeited if we fail to
perform under the purchase agreement. However, we believe this lot acquisition strategy reduces
the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and development. As
of September 30, 2009, we controlled approximately 43,700 lots with deposits in cash and letters
of credit totaling approximately $162,500 and $5,500, respectively. Included in the number of
controlled lots are approximately 15,700 lots for which we have recorded a contract land deposit
impairment reserve of $129,600 as of September 30, 2009. See note 3 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information regarding contract
land deposits.
Current Overview of the Business Environment
The current home sales environment remains challenging, still characterized by high levels
of existing and new homes available for sale driven by slowed demand and high foreclosure rates.
Additionally, homebuyer confidence continues to be negatively impacted by the continuing
economic recession and concerns regarding increasing unemployment as well as concerns regarding
the stability of home values. The current home sales environment also continues to be adversely
impacted by a restrictive mortgage lending environment that has made it more difficult for our
customers to obtain mortgage financing, as well as making it difficult for them to sell their
current homes. Despite these challenging market conditions, new orders, net of cancellations
(new orders), increased 13% in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the same period in
2008, driven we believe in part by the federal tax credit for first-time homebuyers. Although
new orders increased quarter over quarter, we experienced a month to month sequential decline in
new orders during the current quarter. We believe that these sequential monthly declines are
due in part to the continuing uncertainty in the market and to the impending November 30, 2009
first time homebuyer federal tax credit deadline. As the quarter progressed, we were unable to
guarantee delivery of homes prior to the expiration date of the federal tax credit program,
which in turn limited our ability to sell to first time homebuyers seeking to qualify for the
federal tax credit. Selling prices in most of our market segments continue to be negatively
impacted by current market conditions. New orders for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
were flat with new orders for the same period in 2008. We continue to see improvement in the
cancellation rate year over year, decreasing to 14% in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to
24% in the same period of 2008. Overall new order selling prices declined 2% in the third
quarter of 2009 as compared to the third quarter of 2008 and are down 7% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Reflecting the challenging market conditions discussed above, consolidated revenues totaled
$814,016 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, a 13% decrease from the same period in 2008.
Despite this decline in revenue quarter over quarter, net income and diluted earnings per share
in the third quarter of 2009 increased approximately 97% and 89%, respectively, compared to the
third quarter of 2008. Gross profit margins within our homebuilding business improved to 19.7%
in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to 13.2% in the third quarter of 2008. The third
quarter 2008 gross profit margin results were negatively impacted by a $42,839 land deposit
impairment charge.
Based on continuing market uncertainties in both the homebuilding and mortgage markets, we
expect to experience continued sales and pricing pressures over the next several quarters, and
in turn, continued pressure on gross profit margins. To offset declining selling prices and
customer
21
affordability issues, we continue to work aggressively with our subcontractors and
suppliers to reduce material and labor costs incurred in the construction process. We continue
to work with our developers in certain of our communities to reduce lot prices to current market
values and/or to defer scheduled lot purchases to coincide with a slower sales pace. In
communities where we are unsuccessful in negotiating necessary adjustments to the contracts to
meet current market conditions, we may exit the community and forfeit our deposit. During the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, we recognized a net recovery of approximately $1,000 of
contract land deposits previously determined to be uncollectible. In the quarter ended
September 30, 2008, we incurred contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately
$42,800. In addition to these cost reduction measures, we also continue to assess and adjust
our staffing levels and organizational structure as market conditions warrant. Finally, we
continue to strengthen our balance sheet and liquidity. As of September 30, 2009, our cash and
cash equivalents and marketable securities balances totaled approximately $1,375,000.
Homebuilding Operations
The following table summarizes the results of operations and other data for the consolidated
homebuilding operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
792,510 |
|
|
$ |
928,265 |
|
|
$ |
1,953,327 |
|
|
$ |
2,739,167 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
$ |
636,642 |
|
|
$ |
805,931 |
|
|
$ |
1,593,512 |
|
|
$ |
2,305,231 |
|
Gross profit margin percentage |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
$ |
56,662 |
|
|
$ |
66,796 |
|
|
$ |
171,020 |
|
|
$ |
240,833 |
|
Settlements (units) |
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
6,492 |
|
|
|
7,965 |
|
Average settlement price |
|
$ |
296.3 |
|
|
$ |
337.1 |
|
|
$ |
300.4 |
|
|
$ |
343.5 |
|
New orders (units) |
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
|
|
7,409 |
|
|
|
7,403 |
|
Average new order price |
|
$ |
297.1 |
|
|
$ |
302.9 |
|
|
$ |
291.3 |
|
|
$ |
314.1 |
|
Backlog (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,081 |
|
|
|
4,583 |
|
Average backlog price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
296.6 |
|
|
$ |
327.3 |
|
Consolidated Homebuilding Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Homebuilding revenues decreased 15% for the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period
in 2008 as a result of a 12% decrease in the average settlement price and a 3% decrease in the
number of units settled quarter over quarter. The decrease in the average settlement prices were
primarily impacted by a 13% lower average price of homes in backlog entering the third quarter of
2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in the number of units settled is primarily
attributable to our beginning backlog units being approximately 16% lower at the start of the third
quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008, offset by a higher backlog turnover rate
period over period.
Gross profit margins in the quarter ended September 30, 2009 increased compared to the third
quarter of 2008 primarily due to the aforementioned $42,839 in contract land deposit impairment
charges incurred in the third quarter of 2008. In addition, gross profit margins were favorably
impacted by cost control measures initiated in prior quarters and lower lumber and certain other
commodity prices. Despite these favorable results in the third quarter of 2009, market conditions
continue to put pressure on new order selling prices, and we expect to continue to experience
gross profit margin pressure over at least the next several quarters.
The number of new orders for the third quarter of 2009 increased 13% compared to the third
quarter of 2008. As discussed in the Overview section above, the increase in new orders was driven
we
22
believe in part by the federal tax credit for first-time homebuyers. In addition, new orders
were favorably impacted by a reduction in the cancellation rate to 14% in the third quarter of 2009
from 24% in the third quarter of 2008. During the current quarter, we experienced a month to month
sequential decline in new orders. This we believe is a result of the continuing uncertainty in
market conditions and the impending November 30, 2009 first-time homebuyer federal tax credit
deadline, as we were unable to guarantee delivery of homes prior to that deadline. Due to this
market uncertainty, we expect to experience continued pressure on sales and selling prices over at
least the next several quarters in most of our market segments.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses for the third quarter of 2009 decreased
by approximately $10,100 compared to the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in SG&A expenses is
primarily attributable to an approximate $9,300 decrease in selling and marketing costs due
primarily to a 18% reduction in the average number of active communities in the third quarter of
2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008.
Consolidated Homebuilding Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Homebuilding revenues decreased 29% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
the same period in 2008 due to a 18% decrease in the number of units settled and a 13% decrease in
the average settlement price. The decrease in the number of units settled is primarily
attributable to our beginning backlog units being approximately 39% lower entering 2009 compared to
the backlog unit balance entering 2008, offset partially by a higher backlog turnover rate period
over period. Average settlement prices were impacted primarily by a 15% lower average price of
homes in the beginning backlog entering 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Gross profit margins for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 improved to 18.4%
compared to 15.8% for the same period of 2008 primarily due to a favorable variance in contract
land deposit impairment charges period over period. For the first nine months of 2009, we
recognized the recovery of approximately $5,700, or 29 basis points, of contract land deposits
previously determined to be uncollectible. In the comparative period for 2008, we recognized a
contract land deposit impairment charge of approximately $55,200, or 202 basis points.
New orders for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were flat as compared to the same
period in 2008, while the average sales price of new orders decreased 7% over the same respective
periods. As mentioned above in the quarterly discussion, the number of new orders was favorably
impacted by the federal tax credit for first-time homebuyers as well as by a decrease in the
cancellation rate to 14% for the nine month period in 2009 from 22% in the comparative 2008 period.
Average selling prices continue to be negatively impacted by the aforementioned challenging market
conditions.
SG&A expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 decreased approximately
$69,800 compared to the same period in 2008, and as a percentage of revenue were consistent with
the prior year at 8.8%. The decrease in SG&A expenses is primarily attributable to a $30,300
decrease in selling and marketing costs in 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 due to an 18%
decrease in the average number of active communities year over year. In addition, personnel costs
were down approximately $26,900 as a result of lower staffing levels period over period.
Backlog units and dollars were 4,081 and $1,210,447, respectively, as of September 30, 2009
compared to 4,583 and $1,499,830 as of September 30, 2008. The decrease in backlog units is
primarily attributable to our beginning backlog units being approximately 39% lower entering 2009
compared to the same period in 2008. Backlog dollars were negatively impacted by the decrease in
backlog units coupled with a 9% decrease in the average price of homes in ending backlog, resulting
primarily from a 5% decrease in the average selling price for new orders over the six-month period
ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
23
Backlog, which represents homes sold but not yet settled with the customer, may be impacted by
customer cancellations for various reasons that are beyond our control, such as failure to obtain
mortgage financing, inability to sell an existing home, job loss, or a variety of other reasons.
In any period, a portion of the cancellations that we experience are related to new sales that
occurred during the same period, and a portion are related to sales that occurred in prior periods
and therefore appeared in the opening backlog for the current period. Expressed as the total of
all cancellations during the period as a percentage of gross sales during the period, our
cancellation rate was approximately 14% and 22% in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. From the first quarter of 2008 through the third quarter of 2009, approximately 9%
of a reporting quarters opening backlog cancelled during the fiscal quarter. We can provide no
assurance that our historical cancellation rates are indicative of the actual cancellation rate
that may occur in 2009. See Risk Factors in Item 1A of this Report.
Reportable Segments
Homebuilding profit before tax includes all revenues and income generated from the sale
of homes, less the cost of homes sold, selling, general and administrative expenses, and a
corporate capital allocation charge determined at the corporate headquarters. The corporate
capital allocation charge eliminates in consolidation, is based on the segments average net
assets employed, and is charged using a consistent methodology in the periods presented. The
corporate capital allocation charged to the operating segment allows the Chief Operating
Decision Maker to determine whether the operating segments results are providing the desired
rate of return after covering our cost of capital. We record charges on contract land deposits
when we determine that it is probable that recovery of the deposit is impaired. For segment
reporting purposes, impairments on contract land deposits are charged to the operating segment
upon the determination to terminate a finished lot purchase agreement with the developer or to
restructure a lot purchase agreement resulting in the forfeiture of the deposit. We evaluate
our entire net contract land deposit portfolio for impairment each quarter. For additional
information regarding our contract land deposit impairment analysis, see the Critical
Accounting Policies section within this Management Discussion and Analysis. For presentation
purposes below, the contract land deposit reserve at September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, has been allocated to the reportable segments to show contract land deposits on
a net basis. The net contract land deposit balances below also includes $5,500 and $6,600 at
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, of letters of credit issued as deposits in lieu of
cash. The following table summarizes certain homebuilding operating activity by segment for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Mid Atlantic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
491,669 |
|
|
$ |
531,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,212,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,617,708 |
|
Settlements (units) |
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
3,851 |
|
Average settlement price |
|
$ |
354.1 |
|
|
$ |
419.7 |
|
|
$ |
359.5 |
|
|
$ |
420.0 |
|
New orders (units) |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
3,598 |
|
Average new order price |
|
$ |
344.3 |
|
|
$ |
364.2 |
|
|
$ |
345.3 |
|
|
$ |
376.2 |
|
Backlog (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
Average backlog price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
344.5 |
|
|
$ |
386.4 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
$ |
102,145 |
|
|
$ |
90,973 |
|
|
$ |
239,469 |
|
|
$ |
274,221 |
|
Gross profit margin percentage |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Segment profit |
|
$ |
71,919 |
|
|
$ |
45,668 |
|
|
$ |
150,804 |
|
|
$ |
132,395 |
|
New order cancellation rate |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
271,361 |
|
|
$ |
339,528 |
|
Unsold lots and housing units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,720 |
|
|
$ |
37,709 |
|
Unsold inventory impairments |
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
1,450 |
|
|
$ |
936 |
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
79,188 |
|
|
$ |
109,066 |
|
Total lots controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,842 |
|
|
|
30,951 |
|
Total lots reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,806 |
|
|
|
10,810 |
|
Contract land deposit impairments |
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
$ |
1,687 |
|
|
$ |
4,543 |
|
|
$ |
20,459 |
|
Average active communities |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North East: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
74,563 |
|
|
$ |
80,695 |
|
|
$ |
185,081 |
|
|
$ |
265,474 |
|
Settlements (units) |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
Average settlement price |
|
$ |
286.8 |
|
|
$ |
305.7 |
|
|
$ |
288.7 |
|
|
$ |
326.5 |
|
New orders (units) |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
Average new order price |
|
$ |
312.0 |
|
|
$ |
301.6 |
|
|
$ |
291.3 |
|
|
$ |
302.7 |
|
Backlog (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
Average backlog price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
294.5 |
|
|
$ |
299.8 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
$ |
12,960 |
|
|
$ |
13,171 |
|
|
$ |
32,072 |
|
|
$ |
42,128 |
|
Gross profit margin percentage |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
Segment profit |
|
$ |
7,156 |
|
|
$ |
5,173 |
|
|
$ |
15,479 |
|
|
$ |
17,014 |
|
New order cancellation rate |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,418 |
|
|
$ |
47,907 |
|
Unsold lots and housing units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,291 |
|
|
$ |
3,548 |
|
Unsold inventory impairments |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,182 |
|
|
$ |
7,613 |
|
Total lots controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,424 |
|
|
|
5,094 |
|
Total lots reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
Contract land deposit impairments |
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
3,404 |
|
Average active communities |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Mid East: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
156,281 |
|
|
$ |
182,324 |
|
|
$ |
362,373 |
|
|
$ |
487,253 |
|
Settlements (units) |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
Average settlement price |
|
$ |
215.2 |
|
|
$ |
239.6 |
|
|
$ |
215.7 |
|
|
$ |
240.8 |
|
New orders (units) |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
Average new order price |
|
$ |
224.0 |
|
|
$ |
223.5 |
|
|
$ |
216.2 |
|
|
$ |
232.1 |
|
Backlog (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
Average backlog price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
222.2 |
|
|
$ |
229.8 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
$ |
30,319 |
|
|
$ |
33,712 |
|
|
$ |
65,125 |
|
|
$ |
85,239 |
|
Gross profit margin percentage |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
Segment profit |
|
$ |
18,225 |
|
|
$ |
17,622 |
|
|
$ |
30,970 |
|
|
$ |
37,092 |
|
New order cancellation rate |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,830 |
|
|
$ |
78,299 |
|
Unsold lots and housing units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,654 |
|
|
$ |
16,671 |
|
Unsold inventory impairments |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,439 |
|
|
$ |
10,907 |
|
Total lots controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,662 |
|
|
|
13,310 |
|
Total lots reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,314 |
|
|
|
5,273 |
|
Contract land deposit impairments |
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
1,965 |
|
|
$ |
2,119 |
|
Average active communities |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South East |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
69,997 |
|
|
$ |
133,795 |
|
|
$ |
193,088 |
|
|
$ |
368,732 |
|
Settlements (units) |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
Average settlement price |
|
$ |
232.5 |
|
|
$ |
288.4 |
|
|
$ |
238.4 |
|
|
$ |
286.1 |
|
New orders (units) |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Average new order price |
|
$ |
227.8 |
|
|
$ |
251.9 |
|
|
$ |
227.4 |
|
|
$ |
267.1 |
|
Backlog (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
Average backlog price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
234.4 |
|
|
$ |
282.7 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
$ |
10,316 |
|
|
$ |
22,691 |
|
|
$ |
30,641 |
|
|
$ |
65,138 |
|
Gross profit margin percentage |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
Segment profit |
|
$ |
2,870 |
|
|
$ |
10,578 |
|
|
$ |
9,344 |
|
|
$ |
27,220 |
|
New order cancellation rate |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
27.5 |
% |
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,160 |
|
|
$ |
56,886 |
|
Unsold lots and housing units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,615 |
|
|
$ |
8,621 |
|
Unsold inventory impairments |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
|
$ |
7,735 |
|
Total lots controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,062 |
|
|
|
8,913 |
|
Total lots reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
5,139 |
|
Contract land deposit impairments |
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
4,692 |
|
Average active communities |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
26
Mid Atlantic
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $26,300 increase in segment profit in the three
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues decreased
approximately $39,800, or 7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from the prior year
quarter due primarily to a 16% decrease in the average settlement price of units settled,
offset partially by a 10% increase in the number of units settled. The decrease in the average
settlement price is attributable to a 14% lower average price of homes in backlog entering the
third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in units settled in the
current quarter as compared to the third quarter of 2008 are due to a higher backlog turnover rate.
The Mid Atlantic segments gross profit margin percentage for the third quarter of 2009 increased
to 20.8% from 17.1% in the same period in 2008. Gross profit margins and segment profits were
favorably impacted primarily by cost control measures initiated in prior quarters and lower lumber
and certain other commodity prices.
Segment new orders for the third quarter of 2009 increased 24% from the same period in 2008.
The segments average sales price of new orders decreased 5% in the quarter compared to the third
quarter of 2008. New orders increased despite a 19% decrease in the average number of active
communities in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in new
orders was driven in part we believe by the federal tax credit for first-time homebuyers, as well
as by favorable mortgage interest rates during the quarter. New orders were also favorably
impacted by a lower cancellation rate in the third quarter of 2009, decreasing to 13% compared to
26% in the same period in 2008. New order sale prices continue to be negatively impacted by
current market conditions which remain challenging due to high levels of new and existing home
inventory for sale, low consumer confidence and a tighter lending environment. In addition, we
expect that new orders may be negatively impacted in future quarters by the continuing uncertainty
surrounding current market conditions as well as by the expiration of the first time homebuyer
federal tax credit on November 30, 2009.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $18,400 increase in segment profit in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues decreased
approximately $404,900, or 25%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from the prior year
period on a 12% decrease in the number of units settled and a 14% decrease in the average
settlement price. The decrease in units settled is attributable to a 35% lower backlog unit
balance at the beginning of 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008, offset partially by a
higher backlog turnover rate period over period. The decrease in the average settlement price is
primarily attributable to a 17% lower average price of homes in the beginning backlog period over
period. The segments gross profit margin percentage increased to 19.8% in 2009 from 17.0% in
2008. Gross profit margins were favorably impacted by lower contract land deposit impairment
charges in the 2009 period of $4,543, or 37 basis points, compared to $20,459, or 126 basis points,
in 2008. In addition, 2009 gross profit margins as well as segment profit were favorably impacted
by lower lumber and certain other commodity costs as well as by cost control measures taken in
prior quarters, reducing material and personnel costs.
Segment new orders for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 increased 6% from the
same period of 2008, while the segments average sales price of new orders decreased 8% period over
period. New orders increased despite a 19% decrease in the average number of active communities
period over period. As discussed above, we believe that the federal tax credit for first-time
homebuyers had a favorable impact on new orders in the current year period, as first-time
homebuyers make up a higher percentage of our total sales in the segment period over period. In
addition, new orders were favorably impacted by a decrease in the cancellation rate in the first
nine months of 2009 to 14% from 23% during the same period of 2008.
27
Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 10% and 20%, respectively. The decrease in
backlog units is attributable to the beginning backlog units being approximately 35% lower at the
beginning of 2009 as compared to the beginning of 2008. Backlog dollars were negatively impacted
by the decrease in backlog units and an 11% decrease in the average price of homes in ending
backlog, due primarily to a 6% decrease in the average selling price for new orders over the
six-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
North East
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The North East segment had an approximate $2,000 increase in segment profit in the three
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, despite a decrease in revenues
of approximately $6,100, or 8%, quarter over quarter. Revenues declined primarily as a result of a
6% decrease in the average settlement price, while the number of units settled remained flat
quarter over quarter. Average settlement prices were primarily impacted by a 7% lower average
price of homes in backlog entering the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Gross profit margins increased to 17.4% in 2009 from 16.3% in 2008. Gross profit margins and
segment profit were favorably impacted due primarily to lower lumber and certain other commodity
costs, as well as by cost control measures taken in prior quarters, reducing material and personnel
costs.
Segment new orders and the average new order sales price for the third quarter of 2009
increased 8% and 3%, respectively, from the same period in 2008. New orders were favorably
impacted by a lower cancellation rate in the third quarter of 2009, decreasing to 15% compared to
19% in the same period in 2008.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The North East segment had an approximate $1,500 decrease in segment profit in the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues decreased
approximately $80,400, or 30%, for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 from the prior
year period. Revenues declined due to a 21% decrease in the number of units settled and a 12%
decrease in the average settlement price period over period. The decrease in the number of units
settled and the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a 40% lower beginning backlog
balance entering 2009 as compared to 2008 and 15% lower average price of homes in beginning backlog
period over period. Gross profit margins increased to 17.3% in the first nine months of 2009 from
15.9% in the same period 2008. The increase in gross margins is attributable primarily to lower
contract land deposit impairment charges in the 2009 period of $210, or 11 basis points, compared
to the 2008 period of $3,404, or 128 basis points.
Segment new orders and the average new order sales price for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009, decreased 3% and 4%, respectively, from the same period in 2008. New orders in
the current year have been negatively impacted by the continuation of the challenging market
conditions and by a 7% reduction in the average number of active communities within the North East
segment period over period. New orders have been favorably impacted by a decrease in the
cancellation rate to 14% in current year from 18% in the first nine months of 2008.
Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 12% and 14%, respectively. The decrease in
backlog units is attributable to the beginning backlog units being approximately 40% lower entering
2009 as compared to the beginning of 2008. The dollar value of backlog was negatively impacted by
the decrease in backlog units and a 2% decrease in the average price of units in backlog.
28
Mid East
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The Mid East segment had an approximate $600 increase in segment profit quarter over quarter.
Revenues in the segment decreased approximately $26,000, or 14%, for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 from the prior year quarter, due to a 10% decrease in the average settlement
price and a 5% decrease in the number of units settled. The decreases in the average settlement
price and the number of units settled were primarily attributable to a 9% lower average price of
homes in beginning backlog and a 5% lower beginning backlog unit balance entering the third quarter
of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. Gross profit margins increased to 19.4% in 2009 from
18.5% in 2008. Gross profit margins and segment profit were favorably impacted by lower lumber and
certain other commodity costs, as well as to cost control measures taken in prior quarters,
reducing material and personnel costs.
Segment new orders during the third quarter of 2009 decreased 3% from the same period in 2008,
while the average new order selling price remained flat quarter over quarter. New orders were
negatively impacted by a 16% decrease in the average number of active communities in the third
quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The Mid East segment had an approximate $6,100 decrease in segment profit in the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues decreased
approximately $124,900, or 26%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from the prior year
period due to a 17% decrease in the number of units settled and a 10% decrease in the average
settlement price period over period. The decreases in the number of units settled and the average
settlement price were primarily attributable to a 34% lower beginning backlog balance and 9% lower
average price of homes in beginning backlog period over period, respectively. Gross profit margins
increased period over period, as cost reduction measures initiated in prior periods offset the 10%
decrease in the average settlement price period over period.
Segment new orders for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 were relatively flat
compared to the same period in 2008, while the average new order sales price decreased 7% year over
year. New orders were favorably impacted by the federal tax credit for first-time homebuyers, as
well as favorable mortgage rates during the period, despite a 16% decrease in the average number of
active communities period over period. In addition, new orders were favorably impacted by a
decrease in cancellation rates in the Mid-East segment to 14% in the current year from 16% for the
same period in 2008. New order average sale prices continue to be negatively impacted by market
conditions, which continue to negatively impact pricing in each market within this segment.
Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 5% and 8%, respectively, year over year.
The decrease in backlog units is attributable to the beginning backlog units being approximately
34% lower entering 2009 as compared to the beginning of 2008. Backlog dollars were negatively
impacted by the decrease in backlog units and a 3% decrease in the average price of homes in ending
backlog, due primarily to 4% decrease in the average selling price for new orders over the
six-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
South East
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The South East segment had an approximate $7,700 decrease in segment profit quarter over
quarter. Revenues decreased approximately $63,800, or 48%, for the three months ended September
30, 2009 from the prior year quarter, due to a 35% decrease in the number of homes settled and a
19%
29
decrease in the average price of homes settled. The decreases in the number of units settled
and the average settlement price were primarily attributable to a 43% lower beginning backlog unit
balance and 20% lower average price of homes in beginning backlog quarter over quarter, respectively.
Gross profit margins decreased to 14.7% in the third quarter of 2009 from 17.0% in the same period
in 2008. Gross profit margins were negatively impacted by the aforementioned decrease in the
average settlement price and by higher average lot and operating costs per settled unit.
Segment new orders for the third quarter of 2009 increased 7% from the same period in 2008,
while the average new order sales price decreased 10% quarter of quarter. New orders were
favorably impacted by the federal tax credit for first-time homebuyers, despite a 27% decrease in
the average number of active communities quarter over quarter. In addition, new orders were
favorably impacted by a decrease in the cancellation rate to 14% in the third quarter of 2009 from
32% in the same period of 2008. New order sales prices continue to be negatively impacted by
market conditions which continue to deteriorate in the South East segment. As a result of these
challenging market conditions and declining sales prices, we expect to see continued pressure on
selling prices and in turn on gross profit margins over at least the next several quarters.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The South East segment had an approximate $17,900 decrease in segment profit in the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues decreased
approximately $175,600, or 48%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from the prior year
period due to a 37% decrease in the number of units settled and a 17% decrease in the average
settlement price period over period. The decrease in units settled is attributable to a 56% lower
beginning backlog unit balance entering 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, offset partially
by a higher backlog turnover rate period over period. The decrease in the average settlement price
is primarily attributable to a 16% lower average price of units in backlog entering 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008. Gross profit margins decreased to 15.9% in the first nine months of
2009 from 17.7% in the same period of 2008. Gross profit margins were negatively impacted by the
aforementioned decrease in the average settlement price and by higher average lot and operating
costs per settled unit.
Segment new orders and the average new order sales price decreased 17% and 15%, respectively,
during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. New
orders have been negatively impacted by a 28% decrease in the number of active communities period
over period. In addition, the challenging market conditions in the South East segment have
continued to negatively impact both new orders and new order sales prices. New orders were
favorably impacted by a decrease in cancellation rates to 14% in 2009 from 28% in 2008.
Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 27% and 39%, respectively, period over
period. The decrease in backlog units is attributable to the beginning backlog units being
approximately 56% lower entering 2009 as compared to the beginning of 2008. Backlog dollars were
negatively impacted by the decrease in backlog units and a 17% decrease in the average price of
homes in ending backlog, due primarily to a 13% decrease in the average selling price for new
orders over the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Homebuilding Segment Reconciliations to Consolidated Homebuilding Operations
In addition to the corporate capital allocation and contract land deposit impairments
discussed above, the other reconciling items between homebuilding segment profit and
homebuilding consolidated profit before tax include unallocated corporate overhead,
consolidation adjustments, stock option compensation expense and external corporate interest.
NVRs overhead functions, such as accounting, treasury, human resources, etc., are centrally
performed and the costs are not allocated to the Companys operating segments. Consolidation
adjustments consist of such items to convert the reportable segments results, which are
predominantly maintained on a cash
30
basis, to a full accrual basis for external financial
statement presentation purposes, and are not allocated to the Companys operating segments.
Likewise, stock option compensation expenses are not charged to the operating segments.
External corporate interest expense is primarily comprised of interest charges on the
Companys outstanding 5% Senior Notes due 2010 and working capital line
borrowings, and are not charged to the operating segments because the charges are included in
the corporate capital allocation discussed above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Homebuilding Consolidated Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
102,145 |
|
|
$ |
90,973 |
|
|
$ |
239,469 |
|
|
$ |
274,221 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
12,960 |
|
|
|
13,171 |
|
|
|
32,072 |
|
|
|
42,128 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
30,319 |
|
|
|
33,712 |
|
|
|
65,125 |
|
|
|
85,238 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
10,316 |
|
|
|
22,691 |
|
|
|
30,641 |
|
|
|
65,138 |
|
Consolidation adjustments and other |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(38,213 |
) |
|
|
(7,492 |
) |
|
|
(32,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment gross profit |
|
$ |
155,868 |
|
|
$ |
122,334 |
|
|
$ |
359,815 |
|
|
$ |
433,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Homebuilding Consolidated Profit
Before Tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
71,919 |
|
|
$ |
45,668 |
|
|
$ |
150,804 |
|
|
$ |
132,395 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
7,156 |
|
|
|
5,173 |
|
|
|
15,479 |
|
|
|
17,014 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
18,225 |
|
|
|
17,622 |
|
|
|
30,970 |
|
|
|
37,093 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
10,578 |
|
|
|
9,344 |
|
|
|
27,220 |
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract land deposit impairments (1) |
|
|
6,841 |
|
|
|
(40,014 |
) |
|
|
17,302 |
|
|
|
(24,575 |
) |
Stock option expense (2) |
|
|
(10,745 |
) |
|
|
(10,582 |
) |
|
|
(32,743 |
) |
|
|
(27,895 |
) |
Corporate capital allocation (3) |
|
|
17,003 |
|
|
|
27,395 |
|
|
|
47,398 |
|
|
|
83,599 |
|
Unallocated corporate overhead (4) |
|
|
(10,017 |
) |
|
|
(5,447 |
) |
|
|
(34,348 |
) |
|
|
(51,601 |
) |
Consolidation adjustments and other (5) |
|
|
(1,920 |
) |
|
|
9,260 |
|
|
|
(9,190 |
) |
|
|
13,827 |
|
Corporate interest expense |
|
|
(2,706 |
) |
|
|
(3,118 |
) |
|
|
(7,748 |
) |
|
|
(9,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items sub-total |
|
|
(1,544 |
) |
|
|
(22,506 |
) |
|
|
(19,329 |
) |
|
|
(15,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding consolidated
profit before taxes |
|
$ |
98,626 |
|
|
$ |
56,535 |
|
|
$ |
187,268 |
|
|
$ |
197,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This item represents changes to the contract land deposit impairment reserve, which is
not allocated to the reportable segments. During the 2009 quarter and year to date
periods, unallocated reserves decreased as a result of charging previously reserved land
impairments to the operating segments, and to certain recoveries of deposits previously
determined to be impaired. |
|
(2) |
|
The year to date variance is attributable to an adjustment made to the estimated
forfeiture rate used in the calculation of stock option expense in the first quarter of
2008. This resulted in the one-time reversal of approximately $4,800 of stock option
expense in the first quarter of 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
This item represents the elimination of the corporate capital allocation charge
included in the respective homebuilding reportable segments. The decreases in the
corporate capital allocation charge are due to the lower segment asset balances during the
respective periods due to the decreases in operating activity period over period. The
corporate capital allocation charge is based on the segments monthly average asset
balance, and is as follows for the periods presented: |
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Homebuilding Mid
Atlantic |
|
$ |
11,341 |
|
|
$ |
18,334 |
|
|
$ |
31,351 |
|
|
$ |
56,044 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
7,795 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
|
6,690 |
|
|
|
9,897 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
9,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,003 |
|
|
$ |
27,395 |
|
|
$ |
47,398 |
|
|
$ |
83,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The year to date decrease in unallocated corporate overhead is primarily driven by a
reduction in management incentive costs and reduced personnel and other overhead costs as
part of our focus to size our organization to meet current activity levels. |
|
(5) |
|
The decrease in consolidation adjustments and other is primarily due to production
volume increases period over period, as well as to a decrease in interest income earned
related to lower interest rates in 2009 as compared to 2008. |
Mortgage Banking Segment
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
We conduct our mortgage banking activity through NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (NVRM), a wholly
owned subsidiary. NVRM focuses exclusively on serving the homebuilding segments customer base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Loan closing volume: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal |
|
$ |
603,317 |
|
|
$ |
610,313 |
|
|
$ |
1,518,229 |
|
|
$ |
1,727,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable rate mortgages |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate mortgages |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
$ |
15,515 |
|
|
$ |
4,774 |
|
|
$ |
28,724 |
|
|
$ |
24,291 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
(2,105 |
) |
|
|
(1,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking income
before tax |
|
$ |
14,814 |
|
|
$ |
4,072 |
|
|
$ |
26,619 |
|
|
$ |
22,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of loans |
|
$ |
17,660 |
|
|
$ |
7,067 |
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,242 |
|
Title services |
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
9,425 |
|
|
|
10,997 |
|
Servicing |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,506 |
|
|
$ |
10,946 |
|
|
$ |
44,719 |
|
|
$ |
43,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan closing volume for the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased 1% from the same
period in 2008. The 2009 decrease is primarily attributable to a 5% decrease in the average loan
amount, partially offset by a 4% increase in the number of units closed from the same period in
2008. Loan closing volume for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased 12% from the same
period in 2008. This decrease is primarily attributable to a 7% decrease in the number of units
closed and a 5% decrease in the average loan amount. The unit increase for the three month period
ended September 30,
32
2009 was attributable to a 5 percentage point increase in the number of loans
closed by NVRM for our homebuyers who obtain a mortgage to purchase the home (Capture Rate),
partially offset by the aforementioned 3% decrease in the number of homes that our homebuilding
segment settled during the same period in 2008. The Capture Rate for the three month period ended
September 30, 2009 increased to 91%, compared to 86% for same period in 2008. The unit decrease
for the nine months ending September 30, 2009 primarily reflects the aforementioned decrease in the
number of homes that our homebuilding segment settled during the same period in 2008, partially
offset by a 7 percentage point increase in the Capture Rate for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009, which increased to 91%, compared to 84% for the same period in 2008. The
decrease in the average loan amounts for both the three and nine month periods ending September 30,
2009 is primarily attributable to the previously mentioned decrease in the homebuilding segments
average selling price.
Segment profit for the three months ended September 30, 2009, increased approximately $10,700
from the same period for 2008. The increase is primarily due to an approximate $4,300 increase in
mortgage banking fees due to a decrease in incentives given to borrowers and an approximate $6,000
increase in unrealized income from the fair value measurement of our locked loan commitments,
forward mortgage-backed securities sales, and closed loans held for sale, which is included in
mortgage banking fees (see details below).
Segment profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased approximately $4,400
from the same period for 2008. The increase in segment profit for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 was primarily the result of an approximate $4,400 decrease in general and administrative
expenses. This decrease was primarily attributable to an approximate $4,800 decrease in salary and
other personnel costs due to a 27% reduction in staffing from the same period for 2008. Segment
profit was also favorably impacted by an approximate $1,000 increase in mortgage banking fees for
the nine month period ended September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily the result of a
decrease to incentives provided to borrowers and an increase in secondary marketing fees, offset by
the decrease in fees related to the aforementioned volume decrease.
The aforementioned increase in unrealized income for the three month period ended September
30, 2009 from the fair value measurement of our locked loan commitments, forward mortgage-backed
securities sales, and closed loans held for sale, which is included in mortgage banking fees was
the result of an approximate $1,900 unrealized gain compared to a $4,100 unrealized loss for the
same period in 2008. The $4,100 unrealized loss for the three month period ended September 30,
2008 was primarily the result of the principal volume of the locked and closed loan pipeline
decreasing by 39% from June 30, 2008 to September 30, 2008. The pipeline decrease was primarily
the result of the phase out of a 180 day extended lock program during the third quarter of 2008.
The approximate $1,900 increase in unrealized income for the three month period ended September 30,
2009 was primarily the result of an approximate 20% increase in our locked and closed loan pipeline
from June 30, 2009 to September 30, 2009 and interest rate changes. The fair value calculations
are classified as Level 2 observable inputs as defined in GAAP (refer to Note 11, Fair Value
Derivative Instruments, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information). The aforementioned fair value measurements will be impacted in the future by changes
in volume and product mix of our closed and locked loan commitments.
NVRM is dependent on our homebuilding segments customers for business. As new orders and
selling prices of the homebuilding segment decline, NVRMs operations will also be adversely
affected. In addition, the mortgage segments operating results may be adversely affected in
future periods due to the continued tightening and volatility of the credit markets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We fund our operations from cash flows provided by our operating activities, a short-term
credit facility and the public debt and equity markets. In the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009, our operating activities provided cash of $95,936. Cash was provided by
homebuilding
33
operations and was used to fund the increase in homebuilding inventory of $78,269,
as a result of an increase in sold units under construction at September 30, 2009 compared to
December 31, 2008. The presentation of operating cash flows was also reduced by $58,656, which
is the amount of the excess tax benefit realized from the exercise of stock options during the
year and credited directly to additional paid in capital.
Net cash used for investing activities was $260,199 for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009, which primarily resulted from the net purchase of $259,406 of marketable
securities throughout the period. The marketable securities, which are debt securities issued
by the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies, are classified as
held-to-maturity securities and mature within one year.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $132,291 for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009. Stock option exercise activity provided $72,753 in exercise proceeds, and we
realized an excess income tax benefit of $58,656. We also increased borrowings under the
mortgage Repurchase Agreement by approximately $30,832 based on current borrowing needs. Cash
was used during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 to repurchase $29,950 of our
outstanding 5% Senior Notes, at par.
In addition to our homebuilding operating activities, we also utilize a short-term unsecured
working capital revolving credit facility (the Facility) to provide for working capital cash
requirements. On August 4, 2009, NVR entered into an amendment to its $600 million revolving
credit agreement with the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent
(the Amended Facility), to reduce the total available borrowings under the Amended Facility to
$300 million, to eliminate the accordion feature and to amend or eliminate certain non-financial
covenants. The facilitys termination date was unaffected by the amendment and remains December 6,
2010. Outstanding amounts under the Amended Facility bear interest at either (i) the prime rate or
(ii) the London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR) plus applicable margin as defined within the
Facility. Up to $150,000 of the Facility is currently available for issuance in the form of
letters of credit, of which $15,158 was outstanding at September 30, 2009. There were no direct
borrowings outstanding under the Facility as of September 30, 2009 and there were no borrowing base
limitations reducing the amount available to us for borrowings.
Our mortgage banking segment provides for its mortgage origination and other operating
activities using cash generated from operations as well as a revolving mortgage repurchase
facility. On August 5, 2009, NVRM renewed its Master Repurchase Agreement dated August 5, 2008
with U.S. Bank National Association, as Agent and representative of itself as a Buyer, and the
other Buyers thereto (the Master Repurchase Agreement) pursuant to a First Amendment to Master
Repurchase Agreement with U.S. Bank National Association, as Agent and representative of itself as
Buyer (Agent), and the other Buyers thereto (together with the Master Repurchase Agreement, the
Amended Repurchase Agreement). The purpose of the Amended Repurchase Agreement is to finance the
origination of mortgage loans by NVRM. The Amended Repurchase Agreement provides for loan
purchases up to $100 million, subject to certain sublimits. In addition, the Amended Repurchase
Agreement provides for an accordion feature under which NVRM may request that the aggregate
commitments under the Repurchase Agreement be increased to an amount up to $125 million. The
Amended Repurchase Agreement expires on August 3, 2010. Advances under the Amended Repurchase
Agreement carry a Pricing Rate based on the Libor Rate plus the Libor Margin, or at NVRMs option,
the Balance Funded Rate, as these terms are defined in the Amended Repurchase Agreement. The
average Pricing Rate on outstanding balances at September 30, 2009 was 4.5%. The Amended
Repurchase Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants
include among others, certain limitations on transactions involving acquisitions, mergers, the
incurrence of debt, sale of assets and creation of liens upon any of its Mortgage Notes.
Additional covenants include (i) a tangible net worth requirement, (ii) a minimum
tangible net worth ratio, (iii) a minimum net income requirement, and (iv) a minimum liquidity
requirement, all of which we were compliant with at September 30, 2009.
34
During the three month period ended September 30, 2009, we repurchased $2,000 of our
outstanding 5% Senior Notes due June 15, 2010 (Notes) on the open market at par, reducing the
Notes balance to $133,370.
In addition to funding growth in our homebuilding and mortgage operations, we
historically have used a substantial portion of our excess liquidity to repurchase outstanding
shares of our common stock in the open market and in privately negotiated transactions. This
ongoing repurchase activity is conducted pursuant to publicly announced Board authorizations,
and is typically executed in accordance with the safe harbor provisions of Rule 10b-18 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, the Board resolutions
authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock specifically prohibit us from
purchasing shares from our officers, directors, Profit Sharing/401K Plan Trust or Employee
Stock Ownership Plan Trust. We believe the repurchase program assists us in accomplishing our
primary objective, increasing shareholder value. To date we have not repurchased any shares
of our common stock during 2009. We expect to continue to repurchase shares of our common
stock from time to time subject to market conditions and available excess liquidity. See Part
II, Item 2 for further discussion.
We believe that internally generated cash and borrowings available under credit facilities
will be sufficient to satisfy near and long term cash requirements for working capital in both our
homebuilding and mortgage banking operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. We continually evaluate the estimates we use to
prepare the consolidated financial statements, and update those estimates as necessary. In
general, our estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party
professionals, and other various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts
and circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates made by
management.
Variable Interest Entities
GAAP requires the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity to consolidate that
entity in its financial statements. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is
the party that absorbs a majority of the variable interest entitys expected losses, receives a
majority of the entitys expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership,
contractual, or other financial interests in the entity. Expected losses are the expected
negative variability in the fair value of an entitys net assets exclusive of its variable
interests, and expected residual returns are the expected positive variability in the fair
value of an entitys net assets, exclusive of its variable interests.
Forward contracts, such as the fixed price purchase agreements utilized by us to acquire
finished lot inventory, are deemed to be variable interests. Therefore, the development entities
with which we enter fixed price purchase agreements are examined for possible consolidation by us,
including certain joint venture limited liability corporations (LLCs) utilized by us to acquire
finished lots on a limited basis. We have developed a methodology to determine whether we, or,
conversely, the owner(s) of the applicable development entity, are the primary beneficiary of a
development entity. The methodology used to evaluate our primary beneficiary status requires
substantial management judgment and estimates. These judgments and estimates involve assigning probabilities to various estimated cash flow
possibilities
35
relative to the development entitys expected profits and losses and the cash flows
associated with changes in the fair value of finished lots under contract. Although we believe
that our accounting policy is designed to properly assess our primary beneficiary status relative
to our involvement with the development entities from which we acquire finished lots, changes to
the probabilities and the cash flow possibilities used in our evaluation could produce widely
different conclusions regarding whether we are or are not a development entitys primary
beneficiary, possibly resulting in additional, or fewer, development entities being consolidated on
our financial statements. See note 2 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements for further information.
Homebuilding Inventory
The carrying value of inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost of
lots and completed and uncompleted housing units represent the accumulated actual cost of the
units. Field construction supervisors salaries and related direct overhead expenses are
included in inventory costs. Interest costs are not capitalized into inventory. Upon
settlement, the cost of the unit is expensed on a specific identification basis. Cost of
manufacturing materials is determined on a first-in, first-out basis.
Sold inventory is evaluated for impairment based on the contractual selling price compared
to the total estimated cost to construct. Unsold inventory is evaluated for impairment by
analyzing recent comparable sales prices within the applicable community compared to the costs
incurred to date plus the expected costs to complete. Any calculated impairments are recorded
immediately.
Contract Land Deposits
We purchase finished lots under fixed price purchase agreements that require deposits that
may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the contract. The deposits are in the form of
cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage of the aggregate
purchase price of the finished lots.
We maintain an allowance for losses on contract land deposits that reflects our judgment of
the present loss exposure in the existing contract land deposit portfolio at the end of the
reporting period. To analyze contract land deposit impairments, we utilize a loss contingency
analysis that is conducted each quarter. In addition to considering market and economic
conditions, we assess contract land deposit impairments on a community-by-community basis pursuant
to the purchase contract terms, analyzing, as applicable, current sales absorption levels, recent
sales gross profit, the dollar differential between the contractual purchase price and the current
market price for lots, a developers financial stability, a developers financial ability or
willingness to reduce lot prices to current market prices, and the contracts default status by
either us or the developer along with an analysis of the expected outcome of any such default.
Our analysis is focused on whether we can sell houses profitably in a particular community in
the current market with which we are faced. Because we dont own the finished lots on which we had
placed a contract land deposit, if the above analysis leads to a determination that we cant sell
homes profitably at the current contractual lot price, we then determine whether we will elect to
default under the contract, forfeit our deposit and terminate the contract, or whether we will
attempt to restructure the lot purchase contract, which may require us to forfeit the deposit to
obtain contract concessions from a developer. We also assess whether an impairment is present due
to collectibility issues resulting from a developers non-performance because of financial or other
conditions.
Although we consider the allowance for losses on contract land deposits reflected on the
September 30, 2009 balance sheet to be adequate (see note 3 to the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements), there can be no assurance that this allowance will prove to
be
36
adequate over time to cover losses due to unanticipated adverse changes in the economy or
other events adversely affecting specific markets or the homebuilding industry.
Intangible Assets
Reorganization value in excess of identifiable assets (excess reorganization value) is an
indefinite life intangible asset that was created upon our emergence from bankruptcy on September
30, 1993. Based on the allocation of our reorganization value, the portion of our reorganization
value which was not attributed to specific tangible or intangible assets has been reported as
excess reorganization value, which is treated similarly to goodwill. Excess reorganization value
is not subject to amortization. Rather, excess reorganization value is subject to an impairment
assessment on an annual basis or more frequently if changes in events or circumstances indicate
that impairment may have occurred. Because excess reorganization value was based on the
reorganization value of our entire enterprise upon bankruptcy emergence, the impairment assessment
is conducted on an enterprise basis based on the comparison of our total equity compared to the
market value of our outstanding publicly-traded common stock. We do not believe that excess
reorganization value is impaired at this time. However, changes in strategy or continued adverse
changes in market conditions could impact this judgment and require an impairment loss to be
recognized if our book value, including excess reorganization value, exceeds the fair value.
Warranty/Product Liability Accruals
Warranty and product liability accruals are established to provide for estimated future costs
as a result of construction and product defects, product recalls and litigation incidental to our
business. Liability estimates are determined based on our judgment considering such factors as
historical experience, the likely current cost of corrective action, manufacturers and
subcontractors participation in sharing the cost of corrective action, consultations with third
party experts such as engineers, and evaluations by our General Counsel and outside counsel
retained to handle specific product liability cases. Although we consider the warranty and product
liability accrual reflected on the September 30, 2009 balance sheet (see Note 9 to the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements) to be adequate, there can be no assurance that this
accrual will prove to be adequate over time to cover losses due to increased costs for material and
labor, the inability or refusal of manufacturers or subcontractors to financially participate in
corrective action, unanticipated adverse legal settlements, or other unanticipated changes to the
assumptions used to estimate the warranty and product liability accrual.
Stock Option Expense
Compensation costs related to our stock based compensation plans are recognized within our
income statement. The costs recognized are based on the grant date fair value. Compensation
cost for option grants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period
for the entire award (from the date of grant through the period of the last separately vesting
portion of the grant).
We calculate the fair value of our non-publicly traded, employee stock options using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. While the Black-Scholes model is a widely accepted method
to calculate the fair value of options, its results are dependent on input variables, two of
which, expected term and expected volatility, are significantly dependent on managements
judgment. We have concluded that our historical exercise experience is the best estimate of
future exercise patterns to determine an options expected term. To estimate expected
volatility, we analyze the historical volatility of our common stock. Changes in managements
judgment of the expected term and the expected volatility could have a material effect on the
grant-date fair value calculated and expensed within the income statement. In addition, we are
required to estimate future option forfeitures when considering the amount of stock-based
compensation costs to record. We have concluded that our historical forfeiture rate is the
best measure to estimate future forfeitures of granted stock options. However, there can be no
assurance that our future forfeiture rate will not be materially higher or
37
lower than our historical forfeiture rate, which would affect the aggregate cumulative compensation expense
recognized.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in our market risks during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. For additional information regarding market risk, see our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of
these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have been no changes in our
internal controls over financial reporting in the last fiscal quarter that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business is affected by the risks generally incident to the residential construction
business, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
the availability of mortgage financing; |
|
|
|
|
actual and expected direction of interest rates, which affect our costs, the
availability of construction financing, and long-term financing for potential
purchasers of homes; |
|
|
|
|
the availability of adequate land in desirable locations on favorable terms; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in customer preferences; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in the national economy and in the local economies of the markets in which
we have operations. |
All of these risks are discussed in detail below.
The homebuilding industry is experiencing a significant downturn. The continuation of this
downturn could adversely affect our business and our results of operations.
The homebuilding industry has continued to experience a significant downturn as a result
of declining consumer confidence driven by an economic recession, affordability issues and
uncertainty as to the stability of home prices. Additionally, the tightening credit markets
have made it more difficult for customers to obtain financing to purchase homes. As a result,
we have experienced reduced demand for new homes, and we continue to experience an elevated
rate of sales contract cancellations. Our cancellation rate was approximately 23%, 21% and 19%
during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our cancellation rate was 14% during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, which approximates our long-term normalized historical cancellation
rate; however, that rate may not be indicative of the full year cancellation rate that we will
experience for 2009. These ongoing market factors have also resulted in pricing pressures and
in turn lower gross profit margins in most of our markets. A continued downturn in the
homebuilding industry could result in a material adverse effect
38
on our sales (fewer gross sales and/or higher cancellation rates), profitability, stock performance, ability to service our
debt obligations and future cash flows.
If the market value of our inventory or controlled lot position declines, our profit could decrease
and we may incur losses.
Inventory risk can be substantial for homebuilders. The market value of building lots and
housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions. In
addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses in a poorly
performing project or market. We must, in the ordinary course of our business, continuously
seek and make acquisitions of lots for expansion into new markets as well as for replacement
and expansion within our current markets, which is accomplished by us entering fixed price
purchase agreements and paying forfeitable deposits under the purchase agreement to developers
for the contractual right to acquire the lots. In the event of further adverse changes in
economic or market conditions, we may cease further building activities in communities or
restructure existing purchase agreements, resulting in forfeiture of some or all of any
remaining land contract deposit paid to the developer. Either action may result in a loss
which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability, stock performance, ability to
service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
If the tax credit available to first time homebuyers expires on November 30, 2009 and is not
renewed, it may negatively impact our future sales.
As part of the Federal governments economic stimulus efforts, first time homebuyers may
receive an $8 tax credit when filing their Federal income tax return if they purchase and
settle on a primary residence by November 30, 2009, which is the date that the first time
homebuyer tax credit program expires. It is unclear at this time if the Federal government is
going to extend or expand that program past November 30, 2009. This program may have
stimulated our sales over the most recent quarters to levels that would not have been achieved
without the program being in effect. Further, there is a possibility that the availability of
the program to homebuyers pulled sales forward from future quarters which could lead to reduced
demand in the immediate future. The expiration of the first time homebuyer tax credit could
result in a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to
service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
Because almost all of our customers require mortgage financing, the availability of suitable
mortgage financing could impair the affordability of our homes, lower demand for our products, and
limit our ability to fully deliver our backlog.
Our business and earnings depend on the ability of our potential customers to obtain
mortgages for the purchase of our homes. In addition, many of our potential customers must
sell their existing homes in order to buy a home from us. The tightening of credit standards
and the availability of suitable mortgage financing could prevent customers from buying our
homes and could prevent buyers of our customers homes from obtaining mortgages they need to
complete that purchase, both of which could result in our potential customers inability to buy
a home from us. If our potential customers or the buyers of our customers current homes are
not able to obtain suitable financing, the result could have a material adverse effect on our
sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future
cash flows.
If our ability to sell mortgages to investors is impaired, we may be required to fund these
commitments ourselves, or may not be able to originate loans at all.
Our mortgage segment sells all of the loans it originates into the secondary market
usually within 30 days from the date of closing, and has up to approximately $100 million
available in a repurchase agreement to fund mortgage closings. In the event that disruptions to
the secondary markets similar to those which occurred during 2007 and 2008 continue to tighten
or eliminate the
39
available liquidity within the secondary markets for mortgage loans, or the
underwriting requirements by our secondary market investors continue to become more stringent,
our ability to sell future mortgages could decline and we could be required, among other
things, to fund our commitments to our buyers with our own financial resources, which is
limited, or require our home buyers to find another source of financing. In addition,
government-sponsored enterprises, principally FNMA and FHLMC, play a significant role in buying
home mortgages and creating investment securities that they either sell to investors or hold in
their portfolios. These organizations provide liquidity to the secondary mortgage market. The
effects of the government takeover of FNMA and FHLMC are not
yet certain and may restrict or curtail their activities and further disrupt the secondary
markets. The result of such secondary market disruption could have a material adverse effect
on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and
future cash flows.
Interest rate movements, inflation and other economic factors can negatively impact our business.
High rates of inflation generally affect the homebuilding industry adversely because of
their adverse impact on interest rates. High interest rates not only increase the cost of
borrowed funds to homebuilders but also have a significant effect on housing demand and on the
affordability of permanent mortgage financing to prospective purchasers. We are also subject
to potential volatility in the price of commodities that impact costs of materials used in our
homebuilding business. Increases in prevailing interest rates could have a material adverse
effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations
and future cash flows.
Our financial results also are affected by the risks generally incident to our mortgage
banking business, including interest rate levels, the impact of government regulation on
mortgage loan originations and servicing and the need to issue forward commitments to fund and
sell mortgage loans. Our homebuilding customers account for almost all of our mortgage banking
business. The volume of our continuing homebuilding operations therefore affects our mortgage
banking business.
Our mortgage banking business also is affected by interest rate fluctuations. We also may
experience marketing losses resulting from daily increases in interest rates to the extent we
are unable to match interest rates and amounts on loans we have committed to originate with
forward commitments from third parties to purchase such loans. Increases in interest rates may
have a material adverse effect on our mortgage banking revenue, profitability, stock
performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
Our operations may also be adversely affected by other economic factors within our markets
such as negative changes in employment levels, job growth, and consumer confidence and availability
of mortgage financing, one or all of which could result in reduced demand or price depression from
current levels. Such negative trends could have a material adverse effect on homebuilding
operations.
These factors and thus, the homebuilding business, have at times in the past been cyclical
in nature. Any downturn in the national economy or the local economies of the markets in which
we operate could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance
and ability to service our debt obligations. In particular, approximately 38% of our home
settlements during 2009 occurred in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD metropolitan areas,
which accounted for 49% of our homebuilding revenues in 2009. Thus, we are dependent to a
significant extent on the economy and demand for housing in those areas.
Our inability to secure and control an adequate inventory of lots could adversely impact our
operations.
The results of our homebuilding operations are dependent upon our continuing ability to
control an adequate number of homebuilding lots in desirable locations. There can be no
assurance
40
that an adequate supply of building lots will continue to be available to us on terms
similar to those available in the past, or that we will not be required to devote a greater
amount of capital to controlling building lots than we have historically. An insufficient
supply of building lots in one or more of our markets, an inability of our developers to
deliver finished lots in a timely fashion due to their inability to secure financing to fund
development activities or for other reasons, or our inability to purchase or finance building
lots on reasonable terms could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability,
stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
Volatility in the credit and capital markets may impact our ability to access necessary
financing.
Our homebuilding operations are dependent in part on the availability and cost of working
capital financing, and may be adversely affected by a shortage or an increase in the cost of
such financing. If we require working capital greater than that provided by our operations and
our credit facility, we may be required to seek to increase the amount available under the
facility or to obtain alternative financing. No assurance can be given that additional or
replacement financing will be available on terms that are favorable or acceptable. Moreover,
issues involving liquidity and capital adequacy affecting our lenders could in turn affect our
ability to fully access our available credit facilities. In addition, the credit and capital
markets are experiencing significant volatility that is difficult to predict. If we are
required to seek alternative financing to fund our working capital requirements, continued
volatility in these markets may restrict our flexibility to access financing. If we are at any
time unsuccessful in obtaining sufficient capital to fund our planned homebuilding
expenditures, we may experience a substantial delay in the completion of any homes then under
construction, or we may be unable to control or purchase finished building lots. Any delay
could result in cost increases and could have a material adverse effect on our sales,
profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash
flows.
Our mortgage banking operations are dependent on the availability, cost and other terms of
mortgage financing facilities, and may be adversely affected by any shortage or increased cost
of such financing. No assurance can be given that any additional or replacement financing will
be available on terms that are favorable or acceptable. Our mortgage banking operations are
also dependent upon the securitization market for mortgage-backed securities, and could be
materially adversely affected by any fluctuation or downturn in such market.
Our current indebtedness may impact our future operations.
Our existing indebtedness contains financial and other restrictive covenants and any
future indebtedness may also contain covenants. These covenants include limitations on our
ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, pay cash
dividends and make distributions, make loans and investments, enter into transactions with
affiliates, effect certain asset sales, incur certain liens, merge or consolidate with any
other person, or transfer all or substantially all of our properties and assets. Substantial
losses by us or other action or inaction by us or our subsidiaries could result in the
violation of one or more of these covenants which could result in decreased liquidity or a
default on our indebtedness, thereby having a material adverse effect on our sales,
profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash
flows.
Government regulations and environmental matters could negatively affect our operations.
We are subject to various local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and
regulations concerning zoning, building design, construction and similar matters, including
local regulations that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the
number of homes that can eventually be built within the boundaries of a particular area. These
regulations may further increase the cost to produce and market our products. In addition, we
have from time to time been subject to, and may also be subject in the future to, periodic
delays in our homebuilding projects due to building moratoriums in the areas in which we
operate. Changes in regulations that restrict homebuilding
41
activities in one or more of our
principal markets could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock
performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
We are also subject to a variety of local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules
and regulations concerning the protection of health and the environment. We are subject to a
variety of environmental conditions that can affect our business and our homebuilding projects.
The particular environmental laws that apply to any given homebuilding site vary greatly
according to the location and environmental condition of the site and the present and former
uses of the site and adjoining properties. Environmental laws and conditions may result in
delays, cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, or prohibit or severely
restrict homebuilding activity in certain environmentally sensitive regions or areas, thereby
adversely affecting our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt
obligations and future cash flows.
We are an approved seller/servicer of FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, FHA and VA mortgage loans, and
are subject to all of those agencies rules and regulations. Any significant impairment of our
eligibility to sell/service these loans could have a material adverse impact on our mortgage
operations. In addition, we are subject to regulation at the state and federal level with
respect to specific origination, selling and servicing practices including the Real Estate
Settlement and Protection Act. Adverse changes in governmental regulation may have a negative
impact on our mortgage loan origination business.
We face competition in our housing and mortgage banking operations.
The homebuilding industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous homebuilders of
varying size, ranging from local to national in scope, some of whom have greater financial
resources than we do. We face competition:
|
|
|
for suitable and desirable lots at acceptable prices; |
|
|
|
|
from selling incentives offered by competing builders within and across
developments; and |
|
|
|
|
from the existing home resale market. |
Our homebuilding operations compete primarily on the basis of price, location, design,
quality, service and reputation.
The mortgage banking industry is also competitive. Our main competition comes from
national, regional and local mortgage bankers, thrifts, banks and mortgage brokers in each of
these markets. Our mortgage banking operations compete primarily on the basis of customer
service, variety of products offered, interest rates offered, prices of ancillary services and
relative financing availability and costs.
There can be no assurance that we will continue to compete successfully in our homebuilding or
mortgage banking operations. An inability to effectively compete may have an adverse impact on our
sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash
flows.
A shortage of building materials or labor, or increases in materials or labor costs may adversely
impact our operations.
The homebuilding business has from time to time experienced building material and labor
shortages, including shortages in insulation, drywall, certain carpentry work and concrete, as
well as fluctuating lumber prices and supply. In addition, high employment levels and strong
construction market conditions could restrict the labor force available to our subcontractors
and us in one or more of our markets. Significant increases in costs resulting from these
shortages, or delays in construction
42
of homes, could have a material adverse effect upon our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future
cash flows.
Product liability litigation and warranty claims may adversely impact our operations.
Construction defect and home warranty claims are common and can represent a substantial
risk for the homebuilding industry. The cost of insuring against construction defect and
product liability claims, as well as the claims themselves, can be high. In addition,
insurance companies limit coverage offered to protect against these claims. Further
restrictions on coverage availability, or significant increases in premium costs or claims,
could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We are subject to litigation proceedings that could harm our business if an unfavorable ruling were
to occur.
From time to time, we may become involved in litigation and other legal proceedings relating
to claims arising from our operations in the normal course of business. As described in Part I,
Item 3, Legal Proceedings of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008, we are currently subject to certain legal proceedings. Litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings may occur. We cannot assure you that these or other
litigation or legal proceedings will not materially affect our ability to conduct our business in
the manner that we expect or otherwise adversely affect us should an unfavorable ruling occur.
Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of tax laws may negatively affect our operating results.
The effects of possible changes in the tax laws or changes in their interpretation could
have a material negative impact on our financial results.
Certain of our net deferred tax assets could be substantially limited if we experience an ownership
change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.
Certain of our net deferred tax assets give rise to built-in losses (BILs). Our ability to
utilize BILs and to offset our future taxable income and/or to recover previously paid taxes would
be limited if we were to undergo an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code, which we refer to as the Code. In general, an ownership change occurs
whenever the percentage of the stock of a corporation owned by 5-percent shareholders (within the
meaning of Section 382 of the Code) increases by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest
percentage of the stock of such corporation owned by such 5-percent shareholders at any time over
the preceding three years.
An ownership change under Section 382 of the Code would establish an annual limitation on the
amount of BILs we could utilize to offset our taxable income in any single taxable year to an
amount equal to (i) the product of a specified rate, which is published by the U.S. Treasury, and
the aggregate value of our outstanding stock plus (ii) the amount of unutilized limitation from
prior years. The application of these limitations might prevent full utilization of the deferred
tax assets attributable to our BILs. We do not believe we have experienced an ownership change as
defined by Section 382 and, therefore, we do not believe the BILs are subject to any Section 382
limitation. However, whether a change in ownership occurs in the future is largely outside of our
control, and there can be no assurance that such a change will not occur.
Weather-related and other events beyond our control may adversely impact our operations.
Extreme weather or other events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, forest
fires, floods, terrorist attacks or war, may affect our markets, our operations and our
profitability. These events may impact our physical facilities or those of our suppliers or
subcontractors, causing us
43
material increases in costs, or delays in construction of homes,
which could have a material adverse effect upon our sales, profitability, stock performance,
ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
We had one repurchase authorization outstanding during the quarter ended September 30,
2009. On July 31, 2007 (July Authorization), we publicly announced the board of directors
approval for us to repurchase up to an aggregate of $300 million of our common stock in one or
more open market and/or privately negotiated transactions. The July Authorization does not have
an expiration date. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the third
quarter of 2009. We have $226.3 million available under the July Authorization as of September
30, 2009.
Item 6. Exhibits
10.1 |
|
First Amendment to Master Repurchase Agreement dated August 5,
2009 among U.S. Bank National Association, as Agent and a Buyer, the other
Buyers party hereto and NVR Mortgage Finance as Seller. Filed as Exhibit 10.1
to NVRs Form 8-K filed August 7, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.2 |
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 4, 2009
among NVR, Inc. and the lenders party hereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to NVRs Form 8-K filed August 7,
2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32 |
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
44
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
November 3, 2009 |
NVR, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Dennis M. Seremet
|
|
|
|
Dennis M. Seremet |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer |
|
45
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
First Amendment to Master Repurchase Agreement dated
August 5, 2009 among U.S. Bank National Association, as
Agent and a Buyer, the other Buyers party hereto and NVR
Mortgage Finance as Seller. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVRs
Form 8-K filed August 7, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 4,
2009 among NVR, Inc. and the lenders party hereto, and Bank
of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent. Filed as Exhibit 10.2
to NVRs Form 8-K filed August 7, 2009 and incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
49 |
|
46
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS
I, Paul C. Saville, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of NVR, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 3, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Paul C. Saville
|
|
|
|
Paul C. Saville |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
47
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS
I, Dennis M. Seremet, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of NVR, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 3, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Dennis M. Seremet
|
|
|
|
Dennis M. Seremet |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
48
exv32
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NVR, Inc. for the period ended September
30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
each of the undersigned officers of NVR, Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|
1. |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
2. |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NVR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 3, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Paul C. Saville
|
|
|
|
Paul C. Saville |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Dennis M. Seremet
|
|
|
|
Dennis M. Seremet |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
49