e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-12378
NVR, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Virginia
|
|
54-1394360 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500
Reston, Virginia 20190
(703) 956-4000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
(Not Applicable)
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 27, 2009 there were 5,809,566 total shares of common stock outstanding.
NVR, Inc.
Form 10-Q
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
582,157 |
|
|
$ |
1,146,426 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
658,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
9,227 |
|
|
|
11,594 |
|
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots and housing units, covered under
sales agreements with customers |
|
|
416,270 |
|
|
|
335,238 |
|
Unsold lots and housing units |
|
|
38,537 |
|
|
|
57,639 |
|
Manufacturing materials and other |
|
|
5,763 |
|
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460,570 |
|
|
|
400,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets not owned, consolidated
per FIN 46R |
|
|
65,990 |
|
|
|
114,930 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
21,660 |
|
|
|
25,658 |
|
Reorganization value in excess of amounts
allocable to identifiable assets, net |
|
|
41,580 |
|
|
|
41,580 |
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
31,664 |
|
|
|
29,073 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
224,081 |
|
|
|
242,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,095,291 |
|
|
|
2,012,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale, net |
|
|
123,177 |
|
|
|
72,488 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
Reorganization value in excess of amounts
allocable to identifiable assets, net |
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
7,347 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,573 |
|
|
|
8,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,794 |
|
|
|
90,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,237,085 |
|
|
$ |
2,103,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
(Continued)
3
NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
142,557 |
|
|
$ |
137,285 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
163,250 |
|
|
|
194,869 |
|
Liabilities related to assets not owned,
consolidated per FIN 46R |
|
|
60,687 |
|
|
|
109,439 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
70,163 |
|
|
|
59,623 |
|
Other term debt |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
135,370 |
|
|
|
163,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
574,415 |
|
|
|
667,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
17,047 |
|
|
|
17,842 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
97,021 |
|
|
|
44,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,068 |
|
|
|
62,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
688,483 |
|
|
|
729,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 60,000,000
shares authorized; 20,559,671 and
20,561,187
shares issued as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
784,080 |
|
|
|
722,265 |
|
Deferred compensation trust 270,335 and
514,470 shares of NVR, Inc. common
stock as of June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
(44,307 |
) |
|
|
(74,978 |
) |
Deferred compensation liability |
|
|
44,307 |
|
|
|
74,978 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,690,301 |
|
|
|
3,630,887 |
|
Less treasury stock at cost 14,758,071 and
15,028,335 shares at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
(2,925,985 |
) |
|
|
(2,979,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,548,602 |
|
|
|
1,373,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders
equity |
|
$ |
2,237,085 |
|
|
$ |
2,103,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
612,488 |
|
|
$ |
941,033 |
|
|
$ |
1,160,817 |
|
|
$ |
1,810,902 |
|
Other income |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
3,701 |
|
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
|
10,100 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(494,240 |
) |
|
|
(772,369 |
) |
|
|
(956,870 |
) |
|
|
(1,499,300 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
(54,664 |
) |
|
|
(89,871 |
) |
|
|
(114,358 |
) |
|
|
(174,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
65,334 |
|
|
|
82,494 |
|
|
|
93,878 |
|
|
|
147,665 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,462 |
) |
|
|
(3,232 |
) |
|
|
(5,236 |
) |
|
|
(6,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding income |
|
|
62,872 |
|
|
|
79,262 |
|
|
|
88,642 |
|
|
|
141,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking fees |
|
|
12,943 |
|
|
|
14,690 |
|
|
|
23,213 |
|
|
|
32,752 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
Other income |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
(6,475 |
) |
|
|
(8,408 |
) |
|
|
(12,233 |
) |
|
|
(16,062 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
7,155 |
|
|
|
11,805 |
|
|
|
18,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
69,829 |
|
|
|
86,417 |
|
|
|
100,447 |
|
|
|
159,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(28,403 |
) |
|
|
(35,085 |
) |
|
|
(41,033 |
) |
|
|
(64,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
41,426 |
|
|
$ |
51,332 |
|
|
$ |
59,414 |
|
|
$ |
94,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
7.17 |
|
|
$ |
9.58 |
|
|
$ |
10.41 |
|
|
$ |
17.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
6.79 |
|
|
$ |
8.64 |
|
|
$ |
9.85 |
|
|
$ |
16.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic average shares outstanding |
|
|
5,777 |
|
|
|
5,357 |
|
|
|
5,710 |
|
|
|
5,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average shares outstanding |
|
|
6,101 |
|
|
|
5,938 |
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
5,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
59,414 |
|
|
$ |
94,798 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash (used) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,977 |
|
|
|
7,463 |
|
Stock option compensation expense |
|
|
23,402 |
|
|
|
18,432 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
(46,447 |
) |
|
|
(33,184 |
) |
Contract land deposit impairments/(recoveries) |
|
|
(4,744 |
) |
|
|
12,410 |
|
Mortgage loans closed |
|
|
(849,864 |
) |
|
|
(966,798 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans |
|
|
813,476 |
|
|
|
962,615 |
|
Principal payments on mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
(17,340 |
) |
|
|
(25,175 |
) |
Net change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in inventories |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
63,217 |
|
Decrease (increase) in receivables |
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
(5,137 |
) |
Decrease in contract land deposits |
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
5,060 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, customer
deposits and accrued expenses |
|
|
31,588 |
|
|
|
(37,857 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
18,349 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(22,393 |
) |
|
|
100,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities, net |
|
|
(658,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
(3,750 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(658,369 |
) |
|
|
(2,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings under notes payable and other
term debt |
|
|
52,340 |
|
|
|
32,619 |
|
Repurchase of senior notes |
|
|
(27,950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
46,447 |
|
|
|
33,184 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
45,550 |
|
|
|
40,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
116,387 |
|
|
|
105,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(564,375 |
) |
|
|
203,930 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
1,147,643 |
|
|
|
664,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
583,268 |
|
|
$ |
868,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the period |
|
$ |
5,262 |
|
|
$ |
6,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
$ |
(34,303 |
) |
|
$ |
31,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R |
|
$ |
(188 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of NVR, Inc. (NVR or the Company) and its subsidiaries and certain other entities in which the
Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary (see note 2 to the accompanying financial
statements). Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The
statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q
and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required
by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial
statements. Because the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include
all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, they should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
notes thereto included in the Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals except as otherwise noted
herein) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the
three and six-month period ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. We have evaluated all subsequent events through July 29, 2009,
the date the financial statements were issued.
For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, comprehensive income equaled
net income; therefore, a separate statement of comprehensive income is not included in the
accompanying financial statements.
2. Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
Revised Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46R),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, requires the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity to consolidate that entity on its financial statements. The primary beneficiary of
a variable interest entity is the party that absorbs a majority of the variable interest entitys
expected losses, receives a majority of the entitys expected residual returns, or both, as a
result of ownership, contractual, or other financial interests in the entity. Expected losses are
the expected negative variability in the fair value of an entitys net assets, exclusive of its
variable interests, and expected residual returns are the expected positive variability in the fair
value of an entitys net assets, exclusive of its variable interests. As discussed below, NVR
evaluates the provisions of FIN 46R as it relates to NVRs finished lot acquisition strategy.
NVR does not engage in the land development business. Instead, the Company typically
acquires finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under fixed
price purchase agreements. The purchase agreements require deposits that may be forfeited if NVR
fails to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in
the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts, and typically range up to 10% of the
aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. As of June 30, 2009, the Company controlled
approximately 44,300 lots with deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately
$165,000 and $5,400, respectively. See note 3 for further discussion.
NVR believes this lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks
associated with direct land ownership and land development. NVR may, at its option, choose for any
reason and at any time not to perform under these purchase agreements by delivering notice of its
intent not to acquire the finished
7
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
lots under contract. NVRs sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under
these purchase agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidated damage
provisions contained within the purchase agreements. In other words, if NVR does not perform under
a purchase agreement, NVR loses only its deposit. NVR does not have any financial or specific
performance guarantees, or completion obligations, under these purchase agreements. None of the
creditors of any of the development entities with which NVR enters fixed price purchase agreements
have recourse to the general credit of NVR. Except as described below, NVR also does not share in
an allocation of either the profit earned or loss incurred by any of these entities.
On a very limited basis, NVR also obtains finished lots using joint venture limited liability
corporations (LLCs). All LLCs are structured such that NVR is a non-controlling member and is at
risk only for the amount invested by the Company. NVR is not a borrower, guarantor or obligor of
any of the LLCs debt. NVR enters into a standard fixed price purchase agreement to purchase lots
from the LLCs. At June 30, 2009, NVR had an aggregate investment in nine separate LLCs totaling
approximately $7,200, which controlled approximately 350 lots. This investment was fully offset by
a valuation reserve as of June 30, 2009.
Forward contracts, such as the fixed price purchase agreements utilized by NVR to
acquire finished lot inventory, are deemed to be variable interests under FIN 46R. Therefore,
the development entities with which NVR enters fixed price purchase agreements, including the LLCs,
are examined under FIN 46R for possible consolidation by NVR. NVR has developed a methodology to
determine whether it, or conversely, the owner(s) of the applicable development entity is the
primary beneficiary of a development entity. The methodology used to evaluate NVRs primary
beneficiary status requires substantial management judgment and estimation. These judgments and
estimates involve assigning probabilities to various estimated cash flow possibilities relative to
the development entitys expected profits and losses and the cash flows associated with changes in
the fair value of finished lots under contract. Although management believes that its accounting
policy is designed to properly assess NVRs primary beneficiary status relative to its involvement
with the development entities from which NVR acquires finished lots, changes to the probabilities
and the cash flow possibilities used in NVRs evaluation could produce widely different conclusions
regarding whether NVR is or is not a development entitys primary beneficiary.
The Company has evaluated all of its fixed price purchase agreements and LLC arrangements and
has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of twenty-one of those development entities with
which the agreements and arrangements are held. As a result, at June 30, 2009, NVR has
consolidated such development entities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Where NVR deemed itself to be the primary beneficiary of a development entity created after
December 31, 2003 and the development entity refused to provide financial statements, NVR utilized
estimation techniques to perform the consolidation. The effect of the consolidation under FIN 46R
at June 30, 2009 was the inclusion on the balance sheet of $65,990 as Assets not owned,
consolidated per FIN 46R, with a corresponding inclusion of $60,687 as Liabilities related to
assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R, after elimination of intercompany items. Inclusive in
these totals were assets of approximately $30,000 and liabilities of approximately $30,000
estimated for ten development entities created after December 31, 2003 that did not provide
financial statements.
8
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
Following is the consolidating schedule at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NVR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
FIN 46R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Entities |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
582,157 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
582,157 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
658,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,362 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
9,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,227 |
|
Homebuilding inventory |
|
|
460,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460,570 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
21,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,660 |
|
Reorganization value in excess of amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
allocable to identifiable assets, net |
|
|
41,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,580 |
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
32,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
31,664 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
228,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,188 |
) |
|
|
224,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,034,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,303 |
) |
|
|
2,029,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking assets: |
|
|
141,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIN 46R Entities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land under development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,679 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,176,398 |
|
|
$ |
65,990 |
|
|
$ |
(5,303 |
) |
|
$ |
2,237,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
$ |
305,807 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
305,807 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
70,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,163 |
|
Other term debt |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
135,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking liabilities: |
|
|
114,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIN 46R Entities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,287 |
|
|
|
4,370 |
|
|
|
15,657 |
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,030 |
|
Contract land deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
|
(5,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advances from NVR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
(4,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,990 |
|
|
|
(5,303 |
) |
|
|
60,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
1,548,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders
equity |
|
$ |
2,176,398 |
|
|
$ |
65,990 |
|
|
$ |
(5,303 |
) |
|
$ |
2,237,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
3. Contract Land Deposits
The contract land deposit asset is shown net of a $132,500 and $147,900 impairment valuation
allowance at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
4. Earnings per Share
The following weighted average shares and share equivalents are used to calculate basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Basic weighted average number of
shares outstanding |
|
|
5,777,000 |
|
|
|
5,357,000 |
|
|
|
5,710,000 |
|
|
|
5,290,000 |
|
Shares issuable upon exercise
of dilutive options |
|
|
324,000 |
|
|
|
581,000 |
|
|
|
322,000 |
|
|
|
598,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average number of
shares outstanding |
|
|
6,101,000 |
|
|
|
5,938,000 |
|
|
|
6,032,000 |
|
|
|
5,888,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumed proceeds used in the treasury method for calculating NVRs diluted earnings
per share includes the amount the employee must pay upon exercise, the amount of compensation cost
attributed to future services and not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that would be
credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of the option. The assumed amount
credited to additional paid-in capital equals the tax benefit from assumed exercise after
consideration of the intrinsic value upon assumed exercise less the actual stock-based compensation
expense to be recognized in the income statement from 2006 and future periods.
Options to purchase 317,363 and 337,455 shares of common stock during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, and options to purchase 312,395 and 313,145 shares of common stock
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. In addition, 377,861
performance-based options were outstanding as of June 30, 2008 that, pursuant to the requirements
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per Share, were excluded
from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the performance target had not been
achieved. The performance target was not met at December 31, 2008 and all of the performance-based
options outstanding at that time expired unexercisable.
5. Marketable Securities
As of June 30, 2009 the Company held marketable securities totaling $658,362. These
securities are classified by the Company as held-to-maturity, are measured at amortized cost and
mature within one year. The following security types are included in the marketable securities
balance at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Marketable Securities: |
|
|
|
|
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
309,018 |
|
Corporate debt securities issued under the FDIC
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program |
|
|
349,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Marketable Securites |
|
$ |
658,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
10
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
6. Excess Reorganization Value, Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Reorganization value in excess of identifiable assets (excess reorganization value) is an
indefinite life intangible asset that was created upon NVRs emergence from bankruptcy on September
30, 1993. Based on the allocation of the reorganization value in conformity with the procedures
specified by Statement of Position 90-7, Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under
the Bankruptcy Code, issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the portion
of the reorganization value which was not attributed to specific tangible or intangible assets has
been reported as excess reorganization value, which is treated similarly to goodwill. Excess
reorganization value is not subject to amortization pursuant to SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. Rather, excess reorganization value is subject to an impairment assessment on
an annual basis or more frequently if changes in events or circumstances indicate that impairment
may have occurred. Because excess reorganization value was based on the reorganization value of
NVRs entire enterprise upon bankruptcy emergence, the impairment assessment is conducted on an
enterprise basis based on the comparison of NVRs total equity compared to the market value of
NVRs outstanding publicly-traded common stock. The Company completed the annual assessment of
impairment during the first quarter of 2009, and as of June 30, 2009, management believes that
there was no impairment of excess reorganization value.
7. Uncertainty in Income Taxes
As of January 1, 2009, the Company had approximately $53,339 (on a net basis) of unrecognized
tax benefits, which would decrease income tax expense if recognized. The Company recognizes
interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in the income tax expense line. As of January 1,
2009, the Company had a total of $5,150 of accrued interest for unrecognized tax benefits on its
balance sheet. Based on its historical experience in dealing with various taxing authorities, the
Company has found that generally it is the administrative practice of these authorities to not seek
penalties from the Company for the tax positions it has taken on its returns, related to its
unrecognized tax benefits. Therefore, the Company does not accrue penalties for the positions in
which it has an unrecognized tax benefit. However, if such penalties were to be accrued, they would
be recorded as a component of income tax expense. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer
subject to income tax examinations for years prior to 2005.
8. Shareholders Equity
A summary of changes in shareholders equity is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Treasury |
|
Comp. |
|
Comp. |
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Stock |
|
Trust |
|
Liability |
|
Total |
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
722,265 |
|
|
$ |
3,630,887 |
|
|
$ |
(2,979,569 |
) |
|
$ |
(74,978 |
) |
|
$ |
74,978 |
|
|
$ |
1,373,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,414 |
|
Deferred compensation
activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,671 |
|
|
|
(30,671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,402 |
|
Stock option activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,550 |
|
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,447 |
|
Treasury shares issued
upon option exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
784,080 |
|
|
$ |
3,690,301 |
|
|
$ |
(2,925,985 |
) |
|
$ |
(44,307 |
) |
|
$ |
44,307 |
|
|
$ |
1,548,602 |
|
|
|
|
11
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the six months ended
June 30, 2009. The Company settles option exercises by issuing shares of treasury stock to option
holders. Shares are relieved from the treasury account based on the weighted average cost basis of
treasury shares acquired. Approximately 270,000 options to purchase shares of the Companys common
stock were exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
9. Product Warranties
The Company establishes warranty and product liability reserves (warranty reserve)
to provide for estimated future expenses as a result of construction and product defects, product
recalls and litigation incidental to NVRs homebuilding business. Liability estimates are
determined based on managements judgment, considering such factors as historical experience, the
likely current cost of corrective action, manufacturers and subcontractors participation in
sharing the cost of corrective action, consultations with third party experts such as engineers,
and discussions with our general counsel and outside counsel retained to handle specific product
liability cases. The following table reflects the changes in the Companys warranty reserve during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Warranty reserve, beginning of
period |
|
$ |
64,306 |
|
|
$ |
72,272 |
|
|
$ |
68,084 |
|
|
$ |
70,284 |
|
Provision |
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
7,280 |
|
|
|
7,652 |
|
|
|
17,016 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(8,061 |
) |
|
|
(9,802 |
) |
|
|
(14,878 |
) |
|
|
(17,550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve, end of period |
|
$ |
60,858 |
|
|
$ |
69,750 |
|
|
$ |
60,858 |
|
|
$ |
69,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Segment Disclosures
Consistent with the principles and objectives of SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information, the following disclosure includes four homebuilding
reportable segments that aggregate geographically the Companys homebuilding operating
segments, and the mortgage banking operations presented as a single reportable segment. The
homebuilding reportable segments are comprised of operating divisions in the following
geographic areas:
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic - Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware |
|
|
Homebuilding North East - New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania |
|
|
Homebuilding Mid East - Kentucky, New York, Ohio, and western Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
Homebuilding South East - North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee |
Homebuilding profit before tax includes all revenues and income generated from the sale of
homes, less the cost of homes sold, selling, general and administrative expenses, and a corporate
capital allocation charge. The corporate capital allocation charge eliminates in consolidation,
is based on the segments average net assets employed, and is charged using a consistent
methodology in the years presented. The corporate capital allocation charged to the operating
segment allows the Chief Operating Decision Maker, as defined in SFAS No. 131, to determine
whether the operating segments results are providing the desired rate of return after covering
the Companys cost of capital. The Company records charges on contract land deposits when it is
determined that it is probable that recovery of the deposit is impaired. For segment reporting
purposes, impairments on contract land deposits are charged to the operating segment upon the
determination to terminate a finished lot purchase agreement with the developer, or to
restructure a lot purchase agreement resulting in the forfeiture of the deposit. Mortgage
banking profit before tax consists of revenues generated from mortgage financing, title insurance
and closing services, less the costs of such
12
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
services and general and administrative costs. Mortgage banking operations are not charged
a capital allocation charge.
In addition to the corporate capital allocation and contract land deposit impairments
discussed above, the other reconciling items between segment profit and consolidated profit
before tax include unallocated corporate overhead (including all management incentive
compensation), stock option compensation expense, consolidation adjustments and external
corporate interest expense. NVRs overhead functions, such as accounting, treasury, human
resources, etc., are centrally performed and the costs are not allocated to the Companys
operating segments. Consolidation adjustments consist of such items necessary to convert the
reportable segments results, which are predominantly maintained on a cash basis, to a full
accrual basis for external financial statement presentation purposes, and are not allocated to
the Companys operating segments. Likewise, stock option compensation expense is not charged
to the operating segments. External corporate interest expense is primarily comprised of
interest charges on the Companys outstanding Senior Notes and working capital line
borrowings, and is not charged to the operating segments because the charges are included in
the corporate capital allocation discussed above.
Following are tables presenting revenues, segment profit and segment assets for each
reportable segment, with reconciliations to the amounts reported for the consolidated
enterprise, where applicable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
379,361 |
|
|
$ |
559,865 |
|
|
$ |
721,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,086,257 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
57,143 |
|
|
|
98,811 |
|
|
|
110,518 |
|
|
|
184,779 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
113,982 |
|
|
|
154,769 |
|
|
|
206,092 |
|
|
|
304,929 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
62,002 |
|
|
|
127,588 |
|
|
|
123,091 |
|
|
|
234,937 |
|
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
12,943 |
|
|
|
14,690 |
|
|
|
23,213 |
|
|
|
32,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues |
|
$ |
625,431 |
|
|
$ |
955,723 |
|
|
$ |
1,184,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,843,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
46,978 |
|
|
$ |
44,720 |
|
|
$ |
78,885 |
|
|
$ |
86,727 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
5,096 |
|
|
|
5,154 |
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
11,841 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
8,049 |
|
|
|
9,208 |
|
|
|
12,744 |
|
|
|
19,471 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
3,952 |
|
|
|
7,941 |
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
16,642 |
|
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
7,659 |
|
|
|
7,857 |
|
|
|
13,209 |
|
|
|
19,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
|
71,734 |
|
|
|
74,880 |
|
|
|
119,636 |
|
|
|
154,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract land deposit
impairments (1) |
|
|
8,908 |
|
|
|
16,076 |
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
|
|
15,439 |
|
Stock option expense (2) |
|
|
(11,634 |
) |
|
|
(12,099 |
) |
|
|
(23,402 |
) |
|
|
(18,432 |
) |
Corporate capital allocation (3) |
|
|
15,699 |
|
|
|
28,237 |
|
|
|
30,395 |
|
|
|
56,204 |
|
Unallocated corporate overhead
(4) |
|
|
(9,262 |
) |
|
|
(22,469 |
) |
|
|
(24,331 |
) |
|
|
(46,154 |
) |
Consolidation adjustments and
other (5) |
|
|
(3,244 |
) |
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
|
(7,270 |
) |
|
|
4,567 |
|
Corporate interest expense |
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
|
(3,115 |
) |
|
|
(5,042 |
) |
|
|
(6,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items sub-total |
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
|
11,537 |
|
|
|
(19,189 |
) |
|
|
5,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income before taxes |
|
$ |
69,829 |
|
|
$ |
86,417 |
|
|
$ |
100,447 |
|
|
$ |
159,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
450,483 |
|
|
$ |
630,542 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
62,422 |
|
|
|
81,204 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
100,873 |
|
|
|
132,504 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
50,238 |
|
|
|
115,351 |
|
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
134,447 |
|
|
|
147,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
|
798,463 |
|
|
|
1,107,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets not owned, consolidated per Fin 46R |
|
|
65,990 |
|
|
|
145,141 |
|
Cash |
|
|
582,157 |
|
|
|
867,329 |
|
Marketable securities (6) |
|
|
658,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
196,636 |
|
|
|
204,140 |
|
Intangible assets (7) |
|
|
48,927 |
|
|
|
60,655 |
|
Contract land deposit reserve |
|
|
(142,152 |
) |
|
|
(114,271 |
) |
Consolidation adjustments and
other |
|
|
28,702 |
|
|
|
43,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items sub-total |
|
|
1,438,622 |
|
|
|
1,206,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated assets |
|
$ |
2,237,085 |
|
|
$ |
2,313,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This item represents changes to the contract land deposit impairment reserve, which is
not allocated to the reportable segments. During each of the second quarters of 2009 and
2008, unallocated reserves decreased as a result of charging previously reserved land
impairments to the operating segments, and to certain recoveries of deposits previously
determined to be impaired. |
|
(2) |
|
During the first quarter of 2008, the Company adjusted the estimated forfeiture rate
used in the calculation of stock option expense. This resulted in the one-time reversal of
approximately $4,800 of stock option expense in the first quarter of 2008. |
14
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
(3) |
|
This item represents the elimination of the corporate capital allocation charge
included in the respective homebuilding reportable segments. The decreases in the
corporate capital allocation charge are due to the lower segment asset balances during the
respective periods due to the decreases in operating activity period over period. The
corporate capital allocation charge is based on the segments monthly average asset
balance, and is as follows for the periods presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
10,436 |
|
|
$ |
18,956 |
|
|
$ |
20,010 |
|
|
$ |
37,710 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
3,261 |
|
|
|
5,449 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
3,257 |
|
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
6,558 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
3,358 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,699 |
|
|
$ |
28,237 |
|
|
$ |
30,395 |
|
|
$ |
56,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The decrease in unallocated corporate overhead is primarily driven by a reduction in
management incentive costs and reduced personnel and other overhead costs as part of our
focus to size our organization to meet current activity levels. |
|
(5) |
|
The decrease in consolidation adjustments and other is primarily due to a decrease in
interest income earned related to lower interest rates in 2009 as compared to 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
The Company purchased marketable securities during the first quarter of 2009. See Note
5 for further discussion of the investment in marketable securities. |
|
(7) |
|
The decrease is attributable to the fourth quarter 2008 write-off of goodwill and
indefinite life intangible assets related to the Companys acquisitions of Rymarc Homes and
Fox Ridge Homes. |
11. Fair Value
Financial Instruments
Except as otherwise noted here, NVR believes that insignificant differences exist between
the carrying value and the fair value of its financial instruments. The estimated fair value
of NVRs 5% Senior Notes due 2010 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $136,388 and
$161,937, respectively. The estimated fair value is based on a quoted market price. The
carrying value was $135,370 and $163,320 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Derivative Instruments and Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
In the normal course of business, NVRs mortgage banking segment enters into contractual
commitments to extend credit to buyers of single-family homes with fixed expiration dates. The
commitments become effective when the borrowers lock-in a specified interest rate within time
frames established by NVR. All mortgagors are evaluated for credit worthiness prior to the
extension of the commitment. Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the time
of the lock-in of rates by the borrower and the sale date of the loan to a broker/dealer. To
mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments
to borrowers, the Company enters into optional or mandatory delivery forward sale contracts to sell
whole loans and mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers. The forward sale contracts lock in
an interest rate and price for the sale of loans similar to the specific rate lock commitments.
NVR does not engage in speculative or trading derivative activities. Both the rate lock
commitments to borrowers and the
15
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
forward sale contracts to broker/dealers are undesignated
derivatives pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, and, accordingly, are marked to fair value through earnings. At June 30, 2009,
there were contractual commitments to extend credit to borrowers aggregating approximately $166,000
and open forward delivery contracts aggregating approximately $249,000.
Fair value is determined pursuant to SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, and Staff
Accounting Bulletin 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings, both of
which the Company adopted on a prospective basis as of January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 assigns a
fair value hierarchy to the inputs used to measure fair value under the rule. Level 1 inputs are
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Level 2 inputs are inputs
other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs. The fair value of the Companys rate lock
commitments to borrowers and the related input levels includes, as applicable:
|
i) |
|
the assumed gain/loss of the expected resultant loan sale (level 2); |
|
ii) |
|
the effects of interest rate movements between the date of the rate lock and
the balance sheet date (level 2); and |
|
iii) |
|
the value of the servicing rights associated with the loan (level 2). |
The assumed gain/loss considers the amount that the Company has discounted the price to the
borrower from par for competitive reasons and the excess servicing to be received or buydown fees
to be paid upon securitization of the loan. The excess servicing and buydown fees are calculated
pursuant to contractual
terms with investors. To calculate the effects of interest rate movements, the Company
utilizes applicable published mortgage-backed security prices, and multiplies the price movement
between the rate lock date and the balance sheet date by the notional loan commitment amount. The
Company sells all of its loans on a servicing released basis, and receives a servicing released
premium upon sale. Thus, the value of the servicing rights, which averaged 168 basis points of the
loan amount as of June 30, 2009, is included in the fair value measurement and is based upon
contractual terms with investors and varies depending on the loan type. The Company assumes an
approximate 17% fallout rate when measuring the fair value of rate lock commitments. Fallout is
defined as locked loan commitments for which the Company does not close a mortgage loan and is
based on historical experience.
The fair value of the Companys forward sales contracts to broker/dealers solely considers the
market price movement of the same type of security between the trade date and the balance sheet
date (level 2). The market price changes are multiplied by the notional amount of the forward
sales contracts to measure the fair value.
Mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133 when
closed, and thereafter are carried at the lower of cost or fair value until sale. The fair value
of loans held-for-sale of $123,177 included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet exceeds its aggregate principal balance of $122,980 by $197.
The undesignated derivative instruments are included in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Location |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Derivative Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate Lock Commitments/Forward
Sales Contracts |
|
NVRM Other assets |
|
$ |
2,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
The unrealized gain or loss from the change in the fair value measurements is included in
earnings as a component of mortgage banking fees in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of income as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
|
Notional or |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Servicing |
|
|
Security |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
From Loan |
|
|
Movement |
|
|
Rights |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Sale |
|
|
Effect |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
$ |
166,176 |
|
|
$ |
(625 |
) |
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
2,343 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
Forward sales contracts |
|
$ |
248,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Mortgages held for sale |
|
$ |
122,980 |
|
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurement, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
(1,159 |
) |
|
|
(969 |
) |
|
|
4,390 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Fair Value Measurement, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
2,021 |
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Adjustment for the period ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
(2,990 |
) |
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value measurement will be impacted in the future by the change in the value of
the servicing rights and the volume and product mix of the Companys locked loan commitments.
12. Debt
On August 5, 2008, NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (NVRM) entered into a Master Repurchase
Agreement with U.S. Bank National Association, as Agent and representative of itself as a Buyer,
and the other Buyers (the Repurchase Agreement). The Repurchase Agreement replaced NVRMs
warehouse credit
facility which was set to expire on August 21, 2008. The purpose of the Repurchase Agreement
is to finance the origination of mortgage loans by NVRM and is accounted for as a secured borrowing
under SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment
of Liabilities. The Repurchase Agreement provides for loan purchases up to $110,000, subject to
certain sublimits. In addition, the Repurchase Agreement provides for an accordion feature under
which NVRM may request that the aggregate commitments under the Repurchase Agreement be increased
to an amount up to $150,000. The Repurchase Agreement expires on August 4, 2009, and we expect to
be able to renew the Repurchase Agreement at current market terms prior to its expiration.
At June 30, 2009, there was $97,021 outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement, which is
included in liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Amounts
outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement are collateralized by the Companys mortgage loans
held for sale, which are included in assets in the June 30, 2009 balance sheet in the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. As of June 30, 2009, there were no
aggregate outstanding purchase price limitations reducing the amount available to NVRM. There
are several restrictions on purchased loans, including that they cannot be sold to others,
they cannot be pledged to anyone other than the agent, and they cannot support any other
borrowing or repurchase agreement.
On April 3, 2009 NVR repurchased $27,950 of its 5% Senior Notes due June 15, 2010 (the
Notes) on the open market at par, reducing the Notes balance at June 30, 2009 to $135,370.
17
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
13. Commitments and Contingencies
On July 18, 2007, former and current employees filed lawsuits against the Company in the Court
of Common Pleas in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania and Hamilton County, Ohio, in Superior Court in
Durham County, North Carolina, and in the Circuit Court in Montgomery County, Maryland, and on July
19, 2007 in the Superior Court in New Jersey, alleging that the Company incorrectly classified its
sales and marketing representatives as being exempt from overtime wages. These lawsuits are
similar in nature to another lawsuit filed on October 29, 2004 by another former employee in the
United States District Court for the Western District of New York. The complaints seek injunctive
relief, an award of unpaid wages, including fringe benefits, liquidated damages equal to the
overtime wages allegedly due and not paid, attorney and other fees and interest, and where
available, multiple damages. The suits were filed as purported class actions. However, none of
the groups of employees that the lawsuits purport to represent have been certified as a class. The
lawsuits filed in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland and New Jersey have been stayed pending further
developments in the New York action. Following a status conference on July 14, 2009, the parties
have also agreed to stay the North Carolina action pending final disposition of the New York
action.
The Company believes that its compensation practices in regard to sales and marketing
representatives are entirely lawful and in compliance with two letter rulings from the United
States Department of Labor (DOL) issued in January 2007. The two courts to most recently
consider similar claims against other homebuilders have acknowledged the DOLs position that
sales and marketing representatives were properly classified as exempt from overtime wages and
the only court to have directly addressed the exempt status of such employees concluded that
the DOLs position was valid. Accordingly, the Company has vigorously defended and intends to
continue to vigorously defend these lawsuits. Because the Company is unable to determine the
likelihood of an unfavorable outcome of this case, or the amount of damages, if any, the
Company has not recorded any associated liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets.
NVR and its subsidiaries are also involved in various other litigation arising in the
ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, and based on advice of legal
counsel, this litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial
position or results of operations of NVR.
14. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes
new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for
the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a
noncontrolling interest as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the
parents equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be
included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement, but deducted to arrive
at income available to common shareholders. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parents
ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions
if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires
that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such
gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the
deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the
interests of the parent and its non controlling interests. SFAS No. 160 was effective for the
Company beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 did not have a material impact
on the Companys financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2 (FSP No. 157-2),
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008. FSP No. 157-2 became
18
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption of
FSP No. 157-2 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 enhances the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
regarding an entitys derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 was effective for
the Company beginning January 1, 2009. The Company conformed its disclosures to the requirements
of SFAS No. 161.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Positions No. FAS 107-1 and No. APB 28-1 (FSP No.
107-1 and APB No. 28-1), Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, which
enhances the interim disclosures required for the fair value of financial instruments and requires
companies to disclose the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial
instruments. FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 were effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2009.
The Company conformed its disclosures to the requirements of FSP No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4 (FSP No. 157-4),
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP No. 157-4 clarifies
the methodology to be used to determine fair value when there is no active market or where the
price inputs being used represent distressed sales. FSP No. 157-4 also reaffirms the objective of
fair value measurement as stated in SFAS No. 157, which is to reflect how much an asset would be
sold for in an orderly transaction. FSP No. 157-4 was effective for the Company beginning April 1,
2009. The adoption of FSP No. 157-4 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Positions No. FAS 115-2 and No. FAS 124-2, (FSP No.
115-2 and FSP No. 124-2), Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. FSP No. 115-2 and FSP No. 124-2 changes the
existing other-than-temporary impairment model for debt securities and expands and increases the
frequency of disclosures for other-than-temporary impairments for debt and equity securities. It
was effective for the Company beginning
April 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP No. 115-2 and FSP No. 124-2 did not have a material impact
on the Companys financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165), which
establishes the accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of
the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. SFAS
No. 165 was effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2009. The Company conformed its
disclosures to the requirements of SFAS No. 165.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
(SFAS No. 166), which changes the conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial
asset as a sale and requires additional year-end and interim disclosures. SFAS No. 166 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The implementation of SFAS No. 166
is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS
No. 167). This statement amends FASB Interpretation 46R related to the consolidation of variable
interest entities (VIEs) and revises the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE
to be more qualitative in nature and requires companies to more frequently reassess whether they
must consolidate a VIE. SFAS No. 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2009. The Company is currently
19
NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No. 167 on its consolidated
financial statements and results of operations.
In July 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, (SFAS No. 168), which
supersedes SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS
No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which will become the source
of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles recognized by the FASB. SFAS
No. 168 is effective for the period ending after September 15, 2009. The implementation of
SFAS No. 168 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
20
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands) |
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements in this Form 10-Q, as well as statements made by us in periodic press
releases or other public communications, constitute forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Certain, but not
necessarily all, of such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology, such as believes, expects, may, will, should, or
anticipates or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. All statements other than
of historical facts are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements contained in this
document include those regarding market trends, NVRs financial position, business strategy, the
outcome of pending litigation, projected plans and objectives of management for future operations.
Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
that may cause the actual results or performance of NVR to be materially different from future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such
risk factors include, but are not limited to the following: general economic and business
conditions (on both a national and regional level); interest rate changes; access to suitable
financing by NVR and NVRs customers; competition; the availability and cost of land and other raw
materials used by NVR in its homebuilding operations; shortages of labor; weather related
slow-downs; building moratoriums; governmental regulation; fluctuation and volatility of stock and
other financial markets; mortgage financing availability; and other factors over which NVR has
little or no control. NVR undertakes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.
For additional information regarding risk factors, see Part II, Item 1A of this Report.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to NVR, we, us or our include NVR
and its subsidiaries.
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Overview
Our primary business is the construction and sale of single-family detached homes,
townhomes and condominium buildings. To more fully serve our homebuilding customers, we also
operate a mortgage banking and title services business. Our homebuilding reportable segments
consist of the following markets:
|
|
|
Mid Atlantic:
|
|
Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia and Delaware |
North East:
|
|
New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania |
Mid East:
|
|
Kentucky, New York, Ohio and western Pennsylvania |
South East:
|
|
North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee |
We believe that we operate our business with a conservative operating strategy. We do not
engage in land development and primarily construct homes on a pre-sold basis. This strategy
allows us to maximize inventory turnover, which we believe enables us to minimize market risk
and to operate with less capital, thereby enhancing rates of return on equity and total capital.
In addition, we focus on obtaining and maintaining a leading market position in each market we
serve. This strategy allows us to gain valuable efficiencies and competitive advantages in our
markets which management believes contributes to minimizing the adverse effects of regional
economic cycles and provides growth opportunities within these markets.
Because we are not active in the land development business, our continued success is
contingent upon, among other things, our ability to control an adequate supply of finished lots
at current market prices on which to build, and on our developers ability to timely deliver
finished lots to meet the sales demands of
21
our customers. We acquire finished lots from various development entities under fixed price lot
purchase agreements (purchase agreements). These purchase agreements require deposits in the
form of cash or letters of credit that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the purchase
agreement. However, we believe this lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements
and risks associated with direct land ownership and development. As of June 30, 2009, we
controlled approximately 44,300 lots with deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling
approximately $165,000 and $5,400, respectively. Included in the number of controlled lots are
approximately 17,300 lots for which we have recorded a contract land deposit impairment reserve
of $132,500 as of June 30, 2009. See note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
included herein for additional information regarding contract land deposits.
Overview of the Current Business Environment
The current home sales environment remains challenging, still characterized by high levels
of existing and new homes available for sale driven by slowed demand and high foreclosure rates.
Additionally, homebuyer confidence continues to be negatively impacted by the continuing
economic recession and concerns regarding unemployment as well as concerns regarding the
stability of home values. The current home sales environment also continues to be adversely
impacted by a restrictive mortgage lending environment that has made it more difficult for our
customers to obtain mortgage financing, as well as making it difficult for them to sell their
current homes. The challenging market conditions continue to negatively impact new orders and
selling prices in each of our market segments, and in response, we continue to offer incentives
to homebuyers and to reduce prices in many of our markets. Overall, new orders, net of
cancellations (new orders), increased 2% in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to the same
period in 2008, but for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were approximately 5% lower than new
orders for the same period in 2008. We continue to see improvement in the cancellation rate,
decreasing to 14% in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to 19% in the same period of 2008
and 15% in the first quarter of 2009. Average selling prices were down 7% in the second quarter
of 2009 as compared to the second quarter of 2008 and down 9% for the six months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same period in 2008. In our new orders for 2009, we noted an increase in
the percentage of first-time homebuyers, driven we believe in part by the federal tax credit for
first-time homebuyers. New orders to first-time homebuyers in future periods may be negatively
impacted as we reach the November 30, 2009 settlement deadline to qualify for the federal tax
credit.
Reflecting the challenging market conditions discussed above, consolidated revenues totaled
$625,431 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, a 35% decrease from the same period in 2008.
Additionally, net income and diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of 2009 decreased
approximately 19% and 21%, respectively, compared to the second quarter of 2008. Gross profit
margins within our homebuilding business improved to 19.3% in the second quarter of 2009 as
compared to 17.9% in the second quarter of 2008. The improvement in gross profit margins
quarter over quarter is primarily driven by the recovery of approximately $4,500, or 73 basis
points of revenue, of contract land deposits previously determined to be uncollectible. In the
second quarter of 2008, we had recorded a contract land deposit charge of approximately $5,800,
or 62 basis points of revenues.
Based on continuing market uncertainties in both the homebuilding and mortgage markets, we
expect to experience continued pricing pressures and in turn, continued pressure on gross profit
margins in future periods. To offset declining selling prices and customer affordability
issues, we continue to work aggressively with our subcontractors and suppliers to reduce
material and labor costs incurred in the construction process. We continue to work with our
developers in certain of our communities to reduce lot prices to current market values and/or to
defer scheduled lot purchases to coincide with a slower sales pace. In communities where we are
unsuccessful in negotiating necessary adjustments to the contracts to meet current market
conditions, we may exit the community and forfeit our deposit. As noted above, during the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a net recovery of approximately $4,500 of contract
land deposits previously determined to be uncollectible. In the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we
incurred contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $5,800. In addition to these
cost reduction measures, we also continue to assess and adjust our staffing levels and
organizational structure as market conditions warrant.
22
Finally, we continue to strengthen our balance sheet and liquidity. As of June 30, 2009, our
cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities balances totaled approximately $1,241,000.
Homebuilding Operations
The following table summarizes the results of operations and other data for the consolidated
homebuilding operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
612,488 |
|
|
$ |
941,033 |
|
|
$ |
1,160,817 |
|
|
$ |
1,810,902 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
$ |
494,240 |
|
|
$ |
772,369 |
|
|
$ |
956,870 |
|
|
$ |
1,499,300 |
|
Gross profit margin percentage |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
$ |
54,664 |
|
|
$ |
89,871 |
|
|
$ |
114,358 |
|
|
$ |
174,037 |
|
Settlements (units) |
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
3,821 |
|
|
|
5,215 |
|
Average settlement price |
|
$ |
298.6 |
|
|
$ |
341.7 |
|
|
$ |
303.3 |
|
|
$ |
346.9 |
|
New orders (units) |
|
|
2,728 |
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
5,154 |
|
|
|
5,401 |
|
Average new order price |
|
$ |
294.8 |
|
|
$ |
316.4 |
|
|
$ |
288.7 |
|
|
$ |
318.2 |
|
Backlog (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,497 |
|
|
|
5,331 |
|
Average backlog price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
296.2 |
|
|
$ |
341.5 |
|
Consolidated Homebuilding Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Homebuilding revenues decreased 35% for the second quarter of 2009 from the same period in
2008 as a result of a 26% decrease in the number of units settled and a 13% decrease in the average
settlement price quarter over quarter. The decrease in the number of units settled is primarily
attributable to our beginning backlog units being approximately 29% lower entering the second
quarter of 2009 as compared to the same period of 2008. Average settlement prices were impacted
primarily by a 16% lower average price of homes in our beginning backlog balance entering the
second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Gross profit margins in the second quarter of 2009 increased as compared to the second
quarter of 2008 primarily due to the recovery of approximately $4,500, or 73 basis points, of
contract land deposits previously determined to be uncollectible. In the second quarter of
2008, we had recorded a $5,800, or 62 basis points, contract land deposit impairment charge. We
expect continued gross profit margin pressure over at least the next several quarters.
The number of new orders for the second quarter of 2009 increased by 2% compared to the
second quarter of 2008. The average selling price for new orders during the second quarter of
2009 decreased 7% compared to the same period in 2008. New orders increased despite a decrease
in the average number of active communities to 356 in the second quarter of 2009 compared to 435
in the second quarter of 2008. The increase in new orders was driven by several factors
including increased sales to first-time homebuyers as a result of the federal tax credit,
favorable mortgage interest rates during the current quarter and a decrease in the cancellation
rate to 14% in the second quarter of 2009 from 19% in the same period of 2008. New orders in
future periods may be negatively impacted as we reach the November 30, 2009 settlement deadline
to qualify for the federal tax credit. The average selling price for new orders continues to
be impacted by the aforementioned challenging market conditions which continued to put downward
pressure on selling prices.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses for the second quarter of 2009 decreased
by approximately $35,200, and as a percentage of revenue decreased to 8.9% from 9.6% in the second
quarter of
23
2008. The decrease in SG&A expenses is primarily attributable to an approximate $16,200
decrease in
personnel costs as a result of the decrease in headcount period over period. In addition,
selling and marketing costs were lower by approximately $11,100 due primarily to the previously
mentioned 18% reduction in the average number of active communities in the second quarter of 2009
compared to the second quarter of 2008.
Consolidated Homebuilding Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Homebuilding revenues decreased 36% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
same period in 2008 due to a 27% decrease in the number of units settled and a 13% decrease in the
average settlement price. The decrease in the number of units settled is primarily attributable to
our beginning backlog units being approximately 39% lower entering 2009 as compared to the backlog
unit balance entering 2008. Average settlement prices were negatively impacted primarily by a 15%
lower average price of homes in the beginning backlog entering 2009 compared to the same period in
2008.
Gross profit margins in the first six months of 2009 remained relatively flat compared to
gross profit margins for the first six months of 2008 despite a favorable variance in contract land
deposit impairment charges period over period. For the first six months of 2009, we recognized the
recovery of approximately $4,700, or 41 basis points, of contract land deposits previously
determined to be uncollectible. In the comparative period for 2008, we recognized a contract land
deposit impairment charge of approximately $12,400, or 69 basis points. We expect gross profit
margins to continue to be negatively impacted by the aforementioned challenging market conditions
and resulting downward pressure on selling prices for at least the next several quarters.
New orders for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by 5% compared to the same period
in 2008 and the average sales price of new orders decreased 9% over the same respective periods.
New order units and prices have been negatively impacted by the aforementioned challenging market
conditions. In addition, new order units have been negatively impacted by a 19% reduction in the
average number of active communities period over period to 357 in 2009 from 439 in 2008. As
previously discussed in the second quarter discussion of new orders, we believe that the federal
tax credit for first-time homebuyers has had a favorable impact on new orders during the current
year. In addition, new orders have been favorably impacted by a decrease in the cancellation rate
in the first six months of 2009 to 14% from 20% during the same period of 2008.
SG&A expenses for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 decreased approximately $59,700
compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in SG&A expenses is primarily attributable to a
$31,400 decrease in personnel costs as a result of the decrease in headcount period over period.
In addition, selling and marketing costs decreased approximately $21,000 in 2009 as compared to
2008 due to the previously mentioned 19% decrease in the average number of active communities year
over year.
Backlog units and dollars were 4,497 and $1,332,056, respectively, as of June 30, 2009
compared to 5,331 and $1,820,482 as of June 30, 2008. The decrease in backlog units is primarily
attributable to our beginning backlog units being approximately 39% lower at the beginning of 2009
as compared to the beginning of 2008, offset partially by the net new order and settlement activity
for the first six months of 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. Backlog dollars were
negatively impacted by the decrease in backlog units coupled with a 13% decrease in the average
price of homes in ending backlog, resulting primarily from a 9% decrease in the average selling
price for new orders over the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in
2008.
Backlog, which represents homes sold but not yet settled with the customer, may be impacted by
customer cancellations for various reasons that are beyond our control, such as failure to obtain
mortgage financing, inability to sell an existing home, job loss, or a variety of other reasons.
In any period, a portion of the cancellations that we experience are related to new sales that
occurred during the same period, and a portion are related to sales that occurred in prior periods
and therefore appeared in the opening backlog for the current period. Expressed as the total of
all cancellations during the period as a percentage of gross sales
24
during the period, our
cancellation rate was approximately 14% and 20% in the first six months of 2009 and
2008, respectively, and 15% in the first quarter of 2009. During 2008, approximately 10% of a
reporting quarters opening backlog cancelled during the fiscal quarter. We can provide no
assurance that our historical cancellation rates are indicative of the actual cancellation rate
that may occur in 2009. See Risk Factors in Item 1A of this Report.
Reportable Segments
Homebuilding profit before tax includes all revenues and income generated from the sale
of homes, less the cost of homes sold, selling, general and administrative expenses, and a
corporate capital allocation charge determined at the corporate headquarters. The corporate
capital allocation charge eliminates in consolidation, is based on the segments average net
assets employed, and is charged using a consistent methodology in the periods presented. The
corporate capital allocation charged to the operating segment allows the Chief Operating
Decision Maker, as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosure
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, to determine whether the operating
segments results are providing the desired rate of return after covering our cost of capital.
We record charges on contract land deposits when we determine that it is probable that
recovery of the deposit is impaired. For segment reporting purposes, impairments on contract
land deposits are charged to the operating segment upon the determination to terminate a
finished lot purchase agreement with the developer or to restructure a lot purchase agreement
resulting in the forfeiture of the deposit. Due to the current homebuilding industry
downturn, we are evaluating our entire net contract land deposit portfolio for impairment each
quarter. For additional information regarding our contract land deposit impairment analysis,
see the Critical Accounting Policies section within this Management Discussion and Analysis.
For presentation purposes below, the contract land deposit reserve at June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, has been allocated to the reportable segments to show contract land deposits on
a net basis. The net contract land deposit balances below also includes $5,445 and $7,701 at
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, of letters of credit issued as deposits in lieu of cash.
The following table summarizes certain homebuilding operating activity by segment for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Mid Atlantic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
379,361 |
|
|
$ |
559,865 |
|
|
$ |
721,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,086,257 |
|
Settlements (units) |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
2,585 |
|
Average settlement price |
|
$ |
358.9 |
|
|
$ |
416.4 |
|
|
$ |
363.3 |
|
|
$ |
420.1 |
|
New orders (units) |
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
2,633 |
|
Average new order price |
|
$ |
353.5 |
|
|
$ |
378.2 |
|
|
$ |
345.8 |
|
|
$ |
380.7 |
|
Backlog (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
|
2,774 |
|
Average backlog price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
350.1 |
|
|
$ |
409.4 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
$ |
76,378 |
|
|
$ |
93,117 |
|
|
$ |
137,324 |
|
|
$ |
183,248 |
|
Gross profit margin percentage |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
Segment profit |
|
$ |
46,978 |
|
|
$ |
44,720 |
|
|
$ |
78,885 |
|
|
$ |
86,727 |
|
New order cancellation rate |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
271,581 |
|
|
$ |
338,652 |
|
Unsold lots and housing units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,020 |
|
|
$ |
40,621 |
|
Unsold Inventory Impairments |
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
$ |
1,097 |
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,013 |
|
|
$ |
131,626 |
|
Total lots controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,813 |
|
|
|
32,133 |
|
Total lots reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,846 |
|
|
|
9,121 |
|
Contract land deposit impairments |
|
$ |
2,241 |
|
|
$ |
12,742 |
|
|
$ |
3,306 |
|
|
$ |
18,773 |
|
Average active communities |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North East: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
57,143 |
|
|
$ |
98,811 |
|
|
$ |
110,518 |
|
|
$ |
184,779 |
|
Settlements (units) |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
Average settlement price |
|
$ |
290.1 |
|
|
$ |
325.0 |
|
|
$ |
290.1 |
|
|
$ |
336.6 |
|
New orders (units) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
Average new order price |
|
$ |
278.4 |
|
|
$ |
298.1 |
|
|
$ |
281.8 |
|
|
$ |
303.1 |
|
Backlog (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
Average backlog price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
279.9 |
|
|
$ |
302.3 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
$ |
10,673 |
|
|
$ |
13,727 |
|
|
$ |
19,112 |
|
|
$ |
28,958 |
|
Gross profit margin percentage |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
Segment profit |
|
$ |
5,096 |
|
|
$ |
5,154 |
|
|
$ |
8,323 |
|
|
$ |
11,841 |
|
New order cancellation rate |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,252 |
|
|
$ |
46,220 |
|
Unsold lots and housing units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,812 |
|
|
$ |
6,371 |
|
Unsold Inventory Impairments |
|
$ |
509 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
|
$ |
9,773 |
|
Total lots controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,238 |
|
|
|
5,427 |
|
Total lots reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
1,574 |
|
Contract land deposit impairments |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
3,169 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
Average active communities |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Mid East: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
113,982 |
|
|
$ |
154,769 |
|
|
$ |
206,092 |
|
|
$ |
304,929 |
|
Settlements (units) |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
Average settlement price |
|
$ |
212.1 |
|
|
$ |
240.3 |
|
|
$ |
216.0 |
|
|
$ |
241.5 |
|
New orders (units) |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
Average new order price |
|
$ |
215.7 |
|
|
$ |
231.1 |
|
|
$ |
213.2 |
|
|
$ |
235.5 |
|
Backlog (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
Average backlog price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
217.3 |
|
|
$ |
238.3 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
$ |
19,528 |
|
|
$ |
25,760 |
|
|
$ |
34,806 |
|
|
$ |
51,527 |
|
Gross profit margin percentage |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
Segment profit |
|
$ |
8,049 |
|
|
$ |
9,208 |
|
|
$ |
12,744 |
|
|
$ |
19,471 |
|
New order cancellation rate |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
69,375 |
|
|
$ |
82,372 |
|
Unsold lots and housing units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,672 |
|
|
$ |
13,292 |
|
Unsold Inventory Impairments |
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,996 |
|
|
$ |
15,242 |
|
Total lots controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,284 |
|
|
|
13,694 |
|
Total lots reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
Contract land deposit impairments |
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
1,871 |
|
|
$ |
1,822 |
|
|
$ |
1,819 |
|
Average active communities |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South East: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
62,002 |
|
|
$ |
127,588 |
|
|
$ |
123,091 |
|
|
$ |
234,937 |
|
Settlements (units) |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
Average settlement price |
|
$ |
237.6 |
|
|
$ |
275.6 |
|
|
$ |
241.8 |
|
|
$ |
284.8 |
|
New orders (units) |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
Average new order price |
|
$ |
230.3 |
|
|
$ |
270.5 |
|
|
$ |
227.2 |
|
|
$ |
271.9 |
|
Backlog (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
Average backlog price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
237.2 |
|
|
$ |
296.2 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
$ |
10,862 |
|
|
$ |
21,388 |
|
|
$ |
20,325 |
|
|
$ |
42,447 |
|
Gross profit margin percentage |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
Segment profit |
|
$ |
3,952 |
|
|
$ |
7,941 |
|
|
$ |
6,475 |
|
|
$ |
16,642 |
|
New order cancellation rate |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,889 |
|
|
$ |
68,707 |
|
Unsold lots and housing units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,159 |
|
|
$ |
7,442 |
|
Unsold Inventory Impairments |
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Contract land deposits, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
$ |
16,537 |
|
Total lots controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,977 |
|
|
|
9,200 |
|
Total lots reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,255 |
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
Contract land deposit impairments |
|
$ |
504 |
|
|
$ |
4,114 |
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
3,919 |
|
Average active communities |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
27
Mid Atlantic
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $2,200 increase in segment profit in the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues decreased approximately
$180,500, or 32%, for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from the prior year quarter due
primarily to a 21% decrease in the number of units settled and a 14% decrease in the average
settlement price. The decrease in units settled is attributable to a 26% lower backlog unit
balance entering the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, offset partially
by a higher backlog turnover rate period over period. The Mid Atlantic segments gross profit
margin percentage for the second quarter of 2009 increased to 20.1% from 16.6% in the same period
in 2008. Gross profit margins were favorably impacted primarily by lower contract land deposit
impairment charges in the 2009 quarter of $2,241, or 59 basis points, compared to $12,742, or 228
basis points, in the second quarter of 2008.
Segment new orders for the second quarter of 2009 increased 6% from the same period in 2008.
The segments average sales price of new orders decreased 7% in the quarter compared to the second
quarter of 2008. New orders increased despite an 18% decrease in the average number of active
communities in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in
new orders was driven in part by the federal tax credit for first-time homebuyers, as well as by
favorable mortgage interest rates during the quarter. New orders were also favorably impacted by
lower cancellations rates in the second quarter of 2009, decreasing to 14% compared to 19% in the
same period in 2008. New order sale prices continue to be negatively impacted by current market
conditions which remain challenging due to high levels of new and existing home inventory for sale,
low consumer confidence and a tighter lending environment.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $7,800 decrease in segment profit in the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues decreased approximately
$365,100, or 34%, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from the prior year period on a 23%
decrease in the number of units settled and a 14% decrease in the average settlement price. The
decrease in units settled is attributable to a 35% lower backlog unit balance at the beginning of
2009 as compared to the same period in 2008, offset partially by a higher backlog turnover rate
period over period. The decrease in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a
17% lower average price of homes in the beginning backlog period over period. The segments gross
profit margin percentage increased to 19.0% in 2009 from 16.9% in 2008. Gross profit margins were
favorably impacted primarily by lower contract land deposit impairment charges in the 2009 period
of $3,306, or 46 basis points, compared to $18,773, or 173 basis points, in 2008. In addition,
2009 gross profit margins as well as segment profit were favorably impacted by cost control
measures taken in prior quarters, reducing material and land costs, as well as personnel costs.
Segment new orders for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 were flat with new orders in
the prior year period, while the segments average sales price of new orders decreased 9% period
over period. New orders remained flat despite a decrease in the average number of active
communities period over period. As discussed above, we believe that the federal tax credit for
first-time homebuyers has had a favorable impact on new orders in the current year period, as
first-time homebuyers make up a higher percentage of our total sales in the segment period over
period. In addition, new orders were favorably impacted by a decrease in the cancellation rate in
the first six months of 2009 to 15% from 22% during the same period of 2008.
Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 13% and 26%, respectively. The decrease in
backlog units is attributable to the beginning backlog units being approximately 35% lower at the
beginning of 2009 as compared to the beginning of 2008, offset partially by the net new order and
settlement activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009. Backlog dollars were negatively
impacted by the decrease in backlog units and a 14% decrease in the average price of homes in
ending backlog, due primarily to the aforementioned
28
9% decrease in the average selling price for
new orders over the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
North East
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The North East segments profit for the three months ended June 30, 2009 remained flat as
compared to the same period in 2008, despite a decrease in revenues of approximately $41,700 or
42%. Revenues declined as a result of a 35% decrease in the number of units settled and an 11%
decrease in the average settlement price. The decrease in units settled is primarily attributable
to a 34% lower backlog unit balance entering the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period
in 2008. The decrease in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a 10% lower
average price of homes in our beginning backlog balance period over period. Gross profit margins
increased to 18.7% in 2009 from 13.9% in 2008. Gross profit margins were favorably impacted
primarily by lower contract land deposit impairment charges in the 2009 quarter of $60, or 10 basis
points, compared to $3,169, or 321 basis points, in the second quarter of 2008.
Segment new orders increased 3% in the current quarter compared to the prior year quarter,
while the average new order sales price for the second quarter of 2009 decreased 7% from the same
period in 2008. The average new order selling prices continue to be negatively impacted by the
challenging market conditions and continued pricing pressures in each market within this segment.
New orders have been favorably impacted by a decrease in the cancellation rate in the segment to
13% in the second quarter of 2009 from 18% in the second quarter of 2008.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The North East segment had an approximate $3,500 decrease in segment profit in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues decreased approximately
$74,300, or 40%, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 from the prior year period. Revenues
declined due to a 31% decrease in the number of units settled and a 14% decrease in the average
settlement price period over period. The decrease in the number of units settled and the average
settlement price is primarily attributable to a 40% lower beginning backlog balance entering 2009
as compared to 2008 and 15% lower average price of homes in beginning backlog period over period.
Gross profit margins increased to 17.3% in the first six months of 2009 from 15.7% in the same
period 2008. The increase in gross margins is attributable primarily to lower contract land
deposit impairment charges in the 2009 period of $69, or 6 basis points, compared to the 2008
period of $3,339, or 181 basis points.
Segment new orders and the average new order sales price for the six-month period ended June
30, 2009, decreased 8% and 7%, respectively, from the same period in 2008. New orders in the
current year have been negatively impacted by the continuation of the challenging market conditions
and by a 10% reduction in the average number of active communities within the North East segment
period over period. New orders have been favorably impacted by a decrease in the cancellation rate
to 14% in current year from 18% in the first six months of 2008.
Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 15% and 22%, respectively. The decrease in
backlog units is attributable to the beginning backlog units being approximately 40% lower entering
2009 as compared to the beginning of 2008, offset partially by the net new order and settlement
activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009. Backlog dollars were negatively impacted by
the decrease in backlog units and a 7% decrease in the average price of homes in ending backlog,
due primarily to the aforementioned 7%
decrease in the average selling price for new orders over the six-month period ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
29
Mid East
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The Mid East segment had an approximate $1,200 decrease in segment profit quarter over
quarter. Revenues decreased approximately $40,800, or 26%, due to a 17% decrease in the number of
units settled and a 12% decrease in the average settlement price. The decrease in units settled is
attributable to a 16% lower backlog unit balance entering the second quarter of 2009 compared to
the same period in 2008. The decrease in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to
an 11% lower average price of homes in beginning backlog quarter over quarter. Gross profit
margins increased to 17.1% in the second quarter of 2009 from 16.6% in the same period of 2008,
primarily due to cost control measures taken in prior quarters, reducing material and land costs,
as well as personnel costs.
Segment new orders increased 3% during the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period
in 2008, while the average sales price decreased 7% quarter over quarter. New orders increased
despite a 17% decrease in the average number of active communities in the second quarter of 2009
compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in new orders was driven in part by the
federal tax credit for first-time homebuyers, as well as, by favorable mortgage interest rates
during the quarter. New order average sale prices continue to be negatively impacted by current
market conditions which continue to negatively impact pricing in each market within this segment.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The Mid East segment had an approximate $6,700 decrease in segment profit in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues decreased approximately
$98,800, or 32%, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from the prior year period due to a 25%
decrease in the number of units settled and a 11% decrease in the average settlement price period
over period. The decrease in the number of units settled and the average settlement price is
primarily attributable to a 34% lower beginning backlog balance and 9% lower average price of homes
in beginning backlog period over period, respectively. Gross profit margins were flat period over
period, as cost reduction measures initiated in prior periods offset the 11% decrease in the
average settlement price period over period.
Segment new orders for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 were flat compared to the same
period in 2008, while the average new order sales price decreased 9% year over year. As discussed
above in the second quarter discussion, new orders were favorably impacted by the federal tax
credit for first-time homebuyers, as well as favorable mortgage rates during the period. In
addition, cancellation rates in the Mid-East segment remained constant at 14% year over year. New
order average sale prices continue to be negatively impacted by current market conditions, which
continue to negatively impact pricing in each market within this segment.
Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 5% and 14%, respectively, year over year.
The decrease in backlog units is attributable to the beginning backlog units being approximately
34% lower entering 2009 as compared to the beginning of 2008, offset partially by the net new order
and settlement activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009. Backlog dollars were
negatively impacted by the decrease in backlog units and a 9% decrease in the average price of
homes in ending backlog, due primarily to the aforementioned 9% decrease in the average selling
price for new orders over the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in
2008.
South East
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The South East segment had an approximate $4,000 decrease in segment profit quarter over
quarter. Revenues decreased approximately $65,600, or 51%, due to a 44% decrease in the number of
homes settled
30
and a 14% decrease in the average settlement price. The decrease in units settled is
attributable to a 55% lower unit backlog entering the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008, offset partially by a higher backlog turnover rate quarter over quarter. The
decrease in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a 18% lower average price of
units in backlog entering the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Gross
profit margins increased to 17.5% in the second quarter of 2009 from 16.8% in the same period in
2008. Gross profit margins were favorably impacted by lower contract land deposit charges of $504,
or 81 basis points, in the second quarter of 2009 compared to $4,114, or 322 basis points in the
second quarter of 2008.
Segment new orders and the average new order sales price during the second quarter of 2009
decreased 13% and 15%, respectively, from the same period in 2008. The decrease in new orders is
attributable to the continuing challenging market conditions within each of our markets in the
South East segment. In addition, new orders were negatively impacted by a 29% decrease in the
average number of active communities quarter over quarter. New orders for the current quarter were
favorably impacted by a decrease in the cancellation rate to 14% from 28% in the same period of
2008.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The South East segment had an approximate $10,200 decrease in segment profit in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues decreased approximately
$111,800, or 48%, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from the prior year period due to a 38%
decrease in the number of units settled and a 15% decrease in the average settlement price period
over period. The decrease in units settled is attributable to a 56% lower beginning backlog unit
balance entering 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, offset partially by a higher backlog
turnover rate period over period. The decrease in the average settlement price is primarily
attributable to a 16% lower average price of units in backlog entering 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008. Gross profit margins decreased to 16.5% in the first six months of 2009 from 18.1%
in the same period of 2008 primarily as a result of the 15% decrease in the average settlement
price period over period. This decrease was partially offset by lower contract land deposit
charges of $520, or 42 basis points, in 2009 compared to $3,919, or 167 basis points in 2008.
Segment new orders and the average new order sales price decreased 25% and 16%, respectively,
during the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. New orders
have been negatively impacted by a 28% decrease in the number of active communities period over
period. In addition, the challenging market conditions in the South East segment have continued to
negatively impact both new orders and new order sales prices. New orders were favorably impacted
by a decrease in cancellation rates to 14% in 2009 from 26% in 2008.
Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 43% and 54%, respectively, period over
period. The decrease in backlog units is attributable to the beginning backlog units being
approximately 56% lower entering 2009 as compared to the beginning of 2008, offset partially by the
net new order and settlement activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009. Backlog
dollars were negatively impacted by the decrease in backlog units and a 20% decrease in the average
price of homes in ending backlog, due primarily to the aforementioned 16% decrease in the average
selling price for new orders over the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008.
Homebuilding Segment Reconciliations to Consolidated Homebuilding Operations
In addition to the corporate capital allocation and contract land deposit impairments
discussed above, the other reconciling items between homebuilding segment profit and
homebuilding consolidated
profit before tax include unallocated corporate overhead, consolidation adjustments, stock
option compensation expense and external corporate interest. NVRs overhead functions, such
as accounting, treasury, human resources, etc., are centrally performed and the costs are not
allocated to the Companys operating segments. Consolidation adjustments consist of such
items to convert the reportable segments results, which are predominantly maintained on a
cash basis, to a full accrual basis for external financial
31
statement presentation purposes,
and are not allocated to the Companys operating segments. Likewise, stock option
compensation expenses are not charged to the operating segments. External corporate interest
expense is primarily comprised of interest charges on the Companys outstanding 5% Senior
Notes due 2010 and working capital line borrowings, and are not charged to the operating
segments because the charges are included in the corporate capital allocation discussed above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Homebuilding Consolidated Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
76,378 |
|
|
$ |
93,117 |
|
|
$ |
137,324 |
|
|
$ |
183,248 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
10,673 |
|
|
|
13,727 |
|
|
|
19,112 |
|
|
|
28,958 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
19,528 |
|
|
|
25,760 |
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
51,527 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
10,862 |
|
|
|
21,388 |
|
|
|
20,325 |
|
|
|
42,447 |
|
Consolidation adjustments and other |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
14,672 |
|
|
|
(7,620 |
) |
|
|
5,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment gross profit |
|
$ |
118,248 |
|
|
$ |
168,664 |
|
|
$ |
203,947 |
|
|
$ |
311,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Homebuilding Consolidated Profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
46,978 |
|
|
$ |
44,720 |
|
|
$ |
78,885 |
|
|
$ |
86,727 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
5,096 |
|
|
|
5,154 |
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
11,841 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
8,049 |
|
|
|
9,208 |
|
|
|
12,744 |
|
|
|
19,471 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
3,952 |
|
|
|
7,941 |
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
16,642 |
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract land deposit impairments
(1) |
|
|
8,908 |
|
|
|
16,076 |
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
|
|
15,439 |
|
Stock option expense (2) |
|
|
(10,932 |
) |
|
|
(11,397 |
) |
|
|
(21,998 |
) |
|
|
(17,313 |
) |
Corporate capital allocation (3) |
|
|
15,699 |
|
|
|
28,237 |
|
|
|
30,395 |
|
|
|
56,204 |
|
Unallocated corporate overhead (4) |
|
|
(9,262 |
) |
|
|
(22,469 |
) |
|
|
(24,331 |
) |
|
|
(46,154 |
) |
Consolidation adjustments and
other (5) |
|
|
(3,244 |
) |
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
|
(7,270 |
) |
|
|
4,567 |
|
Corporate interest expense |
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
|
(3,115 |
) |
|
|
(5,042 |
) |
|
|
(6,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items sub-total |
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
|
|
12,239 |
|
|
|
(17,785 |
) |
|
|
6,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding consolidated
profit before taxes |
|
$ |
62,872 |
|
|
$ |
79,262 |
|
|
$ |
88,642 |
|
|
$ |
141,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This item represents changes to the contract land deposit impairment reserve, which is
not allocated to the reportable segments. During each of the second quarters of 2009 and
2008, unallocated reserves decreased as a result of charging previously reserved land
impairments to the operating segments, and to certain recoveries of deposits previously
determined to be impaired. |
|
(2) |
|
During the first quarter of 2008, the Company adjusted the estimated forfeiture rate
used in the calculation of stock option expense. This resulted in the one-time reversal of
approximately $4,800 of stock option expense in the first quarter of 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
This item represents the elimination of the corporate capital allocation charge
included in the respective homebuilding reportable segments. The decreases in the
corporate capital allocation charge are due to the lower
segment asset balances during the respective periods due to the decreases in operating
activity period over period. The corporate capital allocation charge is based on the
segments monthly average asset balance, and is as follows for the periods presented: |
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic |
|
$ |
10,436 |
|
|
$ |
18,956 |
|
|
$ |
20,010 |
|
|
$ |
37,710 |
|
Homebuilding North East |
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
3,261 |
|
|
|
5,449 |
|
Homebuilding Mid East |
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
3,257 |
|
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
6,558 |
|
Homebuilding South East |
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
3,358 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,699 |
|
|
$ |
28,237 |
|
|
$ |
30,395 |
|
|
$ |
56,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The decrease in unallocated corporate overhead is primarily driven by a reduction in
management incentive costs and reduced personnel and other overhead costs as part of our
focus to size our organization to meet current activity levels. |
|
(5) |
|
The decrease in consolidation adjustments and other is primarily due to a decrease in
interest income earned related to lower interest rates in 2009 as compared to 2008. |
Mortgage Banking Segment
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
We conduct our mortgage banking activity through NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (NVRM), a wholly
owned subsidiary. NVRM focuses exclusively on serving the homebuilding segments customer base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Loan closing volume: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal |
|
$ |
487,618 |
|
|
$ |
593,867 |
|
|
$ |
914,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,117,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan volume mix: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable rate mortgages |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate mortgages |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
$ |
7,659 |
|
|
$ |
7,857 |
|
|
$ |
13,209 |
|
|
$ |
19,517 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking income
before tax |
|
$ |
6,957 |
|
|
$ |
7,155 |
|
|
$ |
11,805 |
|
|
$ |
18,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of loans |
|
$ |
9,776 |
|
|
$ |
10,804 |
|
|
$ |
17,340 |
|
|
$ |
25,175 |
|
Title services |
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
5,694 |
|
|
|
7,216 |
|
Servicing |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,943 |
|
|
$ |
14,690 |
|
|
$ |
23,213 |
|
|
$ |
32,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan closing volume for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased 18% from the same
period in 2008. The 2009 decrease is primarily attributable to a 13% decrease in the number of
units closed and a 6% decrease in the average loan amount. Loan closing volume for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 decreased 18% from the same period in 2008. This decrease is primarily
attributable to a 13% decrease in the number of units closed and a 6% decrease in the average loan
amount. The unit decreases for the three and six months ending June 30, 2009 primarily reflect the
aforementioned decreases in the number of homes that our
homebuilding segment settled during the same periods in 2008. The unit decreases for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 were partially offset by an 8 percentage point
increase in the number of loans closed by NVRM for our homebuyers who obtain a mortgage to purchase
the home (Capture Rate). The Capture Rate for the three month period ended June 30, 2009
increased to 92%, compared to 84% for same
33
period in 2008 and the Capture Rate for the six month
period ended June 30, 2009 increased to 91%, compared to 83% for the same period in 2008. The
decrease in the average loan amounts for both the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2009
are primarily attributable to the previously mentioned decrease in the homebuilding segments
average selling price.
Segment profit for the three months ended June 30, 2009, decreased approximately $200 from the
same period for 2008. The decrease is primarily due to a net decrease in mortgage banking fees
attributable to the previously mentioned decrease in closing volume, which was partially offset by
an increase in secondary marketing fees from the same period in 2008. Segment profit for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 was favorably impacted by an approximate $1,900 decrease in general and
administrative expenses. This decrease was primarily attributable to a $1,600 decrease in salary
and other personnel costs due to a 27% reduction in staffing from the same period for 2008.
Segment profit for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased approximately $6,300 from the
same period for 2008. The decrease is primarily due to a net decrease in mortgage banking fees
attributable to the previously mentioned decrease in closing volume and an approximate $6,500
decrease in unrealized income from the fair value measurements of our locked loan commitments,
forward mortgage-backed securities sales, and closed loans held for sale, which is included in
mortgage banking fees (see details below). The decrease in mortgage banking fees due to the
decrease in closing volume was partially offset by an increase in secondary marketing fees from the
same period in 2008. Segment profit for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was favorably impacted
by an approximate $4,100 decrease in general and administrative expenses. This decrease was
primarily attributable to an approximate $3,900 decrease in salary and other personnel costs due to
a 30% reduction in staffing from the same period for 2008.
The aforementioned $6,500 decrease in unrealized income from the fair value measurement for
the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily due to
the January 1, 2008 adoption of Staff Accounting Bulleting 109, Written Loan commitments recorded
at Fair Value through Earnings (SAB No. 109) and FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurement, which resulted in a net increase of approximately $8,000
in unrealized income for the six month period ended June 30, 2008. As a result of the adoption of
SAB No. 109 and SFAS No. 157, the fair value measurement for locked loan commitments and closed
loans held for sale now includes the assumed gain/loss on the expected resultant loan sale and the
value of the servicing rights associated with the loan. This is in addition to the prior fair
value measurement, which only considered the effects of interest rate movements between the date of
the rate lock and either the loan closing date or the balance sheet date. The resulting $8,000
unrealized gain for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 from the fair value measurement is
primarily attributable to the inclusion of the value of the servicing rights in the fair value
measurement as required by SAB No. 109 and was further increased due to the principal volume of our
locked loan pipeline increasing as a result of a 180 day extended lock program offered to
homebuyers that was instituted during the six month period ended June 30, 2008 and was discontinued
during the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The approximate $1,400 in unrealized income from the
fair value measurement for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 is primarily the result of an
increase in the principal volume of the locked loan commitments and closed loans held for sale as
of June 30, 2009 compared to the fair value measurement for the period ended December 31, 2008.
The fair value calculations are classified as Level 2 observable inputs as defined in SFAS No. 157
(refer to Note 11, Fair Value Derivative Instruments, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information).
NVRM is dependent on our homebuilding segments customers for business. As new orders and
selling prices of the homebuilding segment decline, NVRMs operations will also be adversely
affected. In addition, the mortgage segments operating results may be adversely affected in
future periods due to the continued tightening and volatility of the credit markets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We fund our operations from cash flows provided by our operating activities, a short-term
credit facility and the public debt and equity markets. In the six month period ended June 30,
2009, net cash
34
used for operating activities was $22,393. Cash was provided by homebuilding
operations, which was offset primarily by a $60,000 increase in our homebuilding inventory, as
a result of an increase in sold units under construction at June 30, 2009 compared to December
31, 2008. The presentation of operating cash flows was also reduced by $46,447, which is the
amount of the excess tax benefit realized from the exercise of stock options during the year
and credited directly to additional paid in capital.
Net cash used for investing activities was $658,369 for the period ended June 30, 2009,
which primarily resulted from the net purchase of $658,362 of marketable securities throughout
the period. The marketable securities are classified as held-to-maturity securities and mature
within one year. The following security types are included in the marketable securities balance
at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Marketable Securities: |
|
|
|
|
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
309,018 |
|
Corporate debt securities issued under the FDIC
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program |
|
|
349,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Marketable Securities |
|
$ |
658,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities was $116,387 for the period ended June 30,
2009. Stock option exercise activity during the period ending June 30, 2009 provided $45,550 in
exercise proceeds, and we realized an excess income tax benefit of $46,447, which pursuant to
SFAS No. 123R, must be reported as a financing cash inflow. We also increased borrowings under
the mortgage Repurchase Agreement by approximately $52,000 based on current borrowing needs.
Cash was used during the period ended June 30, 2009 to repurchase $27,950 of our outstanding 5%
Senior Notes, at par.
In addition to our homebuilding operating activities, we also utilize a short-term
unsecured working capital revolving credit facility (the Facility) to provide for working
capital cash requirements. The Facility provides for borrowings up to $600,000, subject to
certain borrowing base limitations. The Facility expires in December 2010 and outstanding
amounts bear interest at either (i) the prime rate or (ii) the London Interbank Offering Rate
(LIBOR) plus applicable margin as defined within the Facility. Up to $150,000 of the Facility
is currently available for issuance in the form of letters of credit, of which $14,320 was
outstanding at June 30, 2009. There were no direct borrowings outstanding under the Facility as
of June 30, 2009 and there were no borrowing base limitations reducing the amount available to
us for borrowings.
Our mortgage banking segment provides for its mortgage origination and other operating
activities using cash generated from operations as well as a revolving mortgage repurchase
facility. On August 5, 2008, NVRM entered into a Master Repurchase Agreement with U.S. Bank
National Association, as Agent and representative of itself as a Buyer, and the other Buyers (the
Repurchase Agreement). The Repurchase Agreement replaced NVRMs warehouse credit facility. The
Repurchase Agreement provides for loan purchases up to $110,000, subject to certain sublimits. In
addition, the Repurchase Agreement provides for an accordion feature under which NVRM may request
that the aggregate commitments under the Repurchase Agreement be increased to an amount up to
$150,000. The Repurchase Agreement is used to fund NVRMs mortgage origination activities, under
which $97,021 was outstanding at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, there were no borrowing base
limitations reducing the amount available to NVRM for borrowings. The Repurchase Agreement expires
on August 4, 2009. Advances under the Repurchase Agreement carry a Pricing Rate based on the Libor
Rate plus the Libor Margin, or at NVRMs option, the Balance Funded Rate, as these terms are
defined in the Repurchase Agreement. The average Pricing Rate on outstanding balances at June 30,
2009 was 1.9%. The Repurchase Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants. The
negative covenants include among others, certain limitations on transactions involving
acquisitions, mergers, the incurrence of debt, sale of assets and creation of liens upon any of its
Mortgage Notes. Additional
covenants include (i) a tangible net worth requirement, (ii) a minimum tangible net worth ratio,
(iii) a minimum net income requirement, and (iv) a minimum liquidity requirement, all of which we
were compliant
35
with at June 30, 2009. We expect that we will be able to renew the Repurchase
Agreement at current market terms prior to its expiration.
During the three month period ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased $27,950 of our outstanding
5% Senior Notes due June 15, 2010 (Notes) on the open market at par, reducing the Notes balance
to $135,370.
In addition to funding growth in our homebuilding and mortgage operations, we
historically have used a substantial portion of our excess liquidity to repurchase outstanding
shares of our common stock in the open market and in privately negotiated transactions. This
ongoing repurchase activity is conducted pursuant to publicly announced Board authorizations,
and is typically executed in accordance with the safe harbor provisions of Rule 10b-18 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, the Board resolutions
authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock specifically prohibit us from
purchasing shares from our officers, directors, Profit Sharing/401K Plan Trust or Employee
Stock Ownership Plan Trust. We believe the repurchase program assists us in accomplishing our
primary objective, increasing shareholder value. To date we have not repurchased any shares
of our common stock during 2009. We expect to continue to repurchase shares of our common
stock from time to time subject to market conditions and available excess liquidity. See Part
II, Item 2 for further discussion.
We believe that internally generated cash and borrowings available under credit facilities
will be sufficient to satisfy near and long term cash requirements for working capital in both our
homebuilding and mortgage banking operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. We continually evaluate the estimates we use to prepare
the consolidated financial statements, and update those estimates as necessary. In general, our
estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and
other various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances.
Actual results could differ materially from those estimates made by management.
Variable Interest Entities
Revised Financial Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46R), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, requires the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity to consolidate that
entity in its financial statements. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is
the party that absorbs a majority of the variable interest entitys expected losses, receives a
majority of the entitys expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership,
contractual, or other financial interests in the entity. Expected losses are the expected
negative variability in the fair value of an entitys net assets exclusive of its variable
interests, and expected residual returns are the expected positive variability in the fair
value of an entitys net assets, exclusive of its variable interests.
Forward contracts, such as the fixed price purchase agreements utilized by us to acquire
finished lot inventory, are deemed to be variable interests under FIN 46R. Therefore, the
development entities with which we enter fixed price purchase agreements are examined under FIN 46R
for possible consolidation by us, including certain joint venture limited liability corporations
(LLCs) utilized by us to acquire finished lots on
a limited basis. We have developed a methodology to determine whether we, or, conversely, the
owner(s) of the applicable development entity, are the primary beneficiary of a development entity.
The methodology used
36
to evaluate our primary beneficiary status requires substantial management
judgment and estimates. These judgments and estimates involve assigning probabilities to various
estimated cash flow possibilities relative to the development entitys expected profits and losses
and the cash flows associated with changes in the fair value of finished lots under contract.
Although we believe that our accounting policy is designed to properly assess our primary
beneficiary status relative to our involvement with the development entities from which we acquire
finished lots, changes to the probabilities and the cash flow possibilities used in our evaluation
could produce widely different conclusions regarding whether we are or are not a development
entitys primary beneficiary, possibly resulting in additional, or fewer, development entities
being consolidated on our financial statements. See note 2 to the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements for further information.
Homebuilding Inventory
The carrying value of inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost of
lots and completed and uncompleted housing units represent the accumulated actual cost of the
units. Field construction supervisors salaries and related direct overhead expenses are
included in inventory costs. Interest costs are not capitalized into inventory. Upon
settlement, the cost of the unit is expensed on a specific identification basis. Cost of
manufacturing materials is determined on a first-in, first-out basis.
Sold inventory is evaluated for impairment based on the contractual selling price compared
to the total estimated cost to construct. Unsold inventory is evaluated for impairment by
analyzing recent comparable sales prices within the applicable community compared to the costs
incurred to date plus the expected costs to complete. Any calculated impairments are recorded
immediately.
Contract Land Deposits
We purchase finished lots under fixed price purchase agreements that require deposits that
may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the contract. The deposits are in the form of
cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage of the aggregate
purchase price of the finished lots.
We maintain an allowance for losses on contract land deposits that reflects our judgment of
the present loss exposure in the existing contract land deposit portfolio at the end of the
reporting period. To analyze contract land deposit impairments, we utilize a SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, loss contingency analysis that is conducted each quarter. In
addition to considering market and economic conditions, we assess contract land deposit impairments
on a community-by-community basis pursuant to the purchase contract terms, analyzing, as
applicable, current sales absorption levels, recent sales gross profit, the dollar differential
between the contractual purchase price and the current market price for lots, a developers
financial stability, a developers financial ability or willingness to reduce lot prices to current
market prices, and the contracts default status by either us or the developer along with an
analysis of the expected outcome of any such default.
Our analysis is focused on whether we can sell houses profitably in a particular community in
the current market with which we are faced. Because we dont own the finished lots on which we had
placed a contract land deposit, if the above analysis leads to a determination that we cant sell
homes profitably at the current contractual lot price, we then determine whether we will elect to
default under the contract, forfeit our deposit and terminate the contract, or whether we will
attempt to restructure the lot purchase contract, which may require us to forfeit the deposit to
obtain contract concessions from a developer. We also assess whether an impairment is present due
to collectibility issues resulting from a developers non-performance because of financial or other
conditions.
Although we consider the allowance for losses on contract land deposits reflected on the
June 30, 2009 balance sheet to be adequate (see note 3 to the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements), there can be no assurance that this allowance will prove to
be adequate over time to cover
losses due to unanticipated adverse changes in the economy or other events adversely
affecting specific markets or the homebuilding industry.
37
Intangible Assets
Reorganization value in excess of identifiable assets (excess reorganization value) is an
indefinite life intangible asset that was created upon our emergence from bankruptcy on September
30, 1993. Based on the allocation of our reorganization value in conformity with the procedures
specified by Statement of Position 90-7, Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under
the Bankruptcy Code, issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the portion
of the our reorganization value which was not attributed to specific tangible or intangible assets
has been reported as excess reorganization value, which is treated similarly to goodwill. Excess
reorganization value is not subject to amortization pursuant to SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. Rather, excess reorganization value is subject to an impairment assessment on
an annual basis or more frequently if changes in events or circumstances indicate that impairment
may have occurred. Because excess reorganization value was based on the reorganization value of
our entire enterprise upon bankruptcy emergence, the impairment assessment is conducted on an
enterprise basis based on the comparison of our total equity compared to the market value of our
outstanding publicly-traded common stock. We do not believe that excess reorganization value is
impaired at this time. However, changes in strategy or continued adverse changes in market
conditions could impact this judgment and require an impairment loss to be recognized if our book
value, including excess reorganization value, exceeds the fair value.
Warranty/Product Liability Accruals
Warranty and product liability accruals are established to provide for estimated future costs
as a result of construction and product defects, product recalls and litigation incidental to our
business. Liability estimates are determined based on our judgment considering such factors as
historical experience, the likely current cost of corrective action, manufacturers and
subcontractors participation in sharing the cost of corrective action, consultations with third
party experts such as engineers, and evaluations by our General Counsel and outside counsel
retained to handle specific product liability cases. Although we consider the warranty and product
liability accrual reflected on the June 30, 2009 balance sheet (see Note 9 to the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements) to be adequate, there can be no assurance that this
accrual will prove to be adequate over time to cover losses due to increased costs for material and
labor, the inability or refusal of manufacturers or subcontractors to financially participate in
corrective action, unanticipated adverse legal settlements, or other unanticipated changes to the
assumptions used to estimate the warranty and product liability accrual.
Stock Option Expense
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), requires us to recognize within our
income statement compensation costs related to our stock based compensation plans. The costs
recognized are based on the grant date fair value. Compensation cost for option grants is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award
(from the date of grant through the period of the last separately vesting portion of the
grant).
We calculate the fair value of our non-publicly traded, employee stock options using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. While the Black-Scholes model is a widely accepted method
to calculate the fair value of options, its results are dependent on input variables, two of
which, expected term and expected volatility, are significantly dependent on managements
judgment. We have concluded that our historical exercise experience is the best estimate of
future exercise patterns to determine an options expected term. To estimate expected
volatility, we analyze the historical volatility of our common stock. Changes in managements
judgment of the expected term and the expected volatility could have a material effect on the
grant-date fair value calculated and expensed within the income statement. In addition, we are
required to estimate future option forfeitures when considering the amount of stock-based
compensation costs to record. We have concluded that our historical forfeiture rate is
the best measure to estimate future forfeitures of granted stock options. However, there can
be no assurance that our future
38
forfeiture rate will not be materially higher or lower than our
historical forfeiture rate, which would affect the aggregate cumulative compensation expense
recognized.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in our market risks during the six months
ended June 30, 2009. For additional information regarding market risk, see our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design
and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have been no
changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the
evaluation referred to above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business is affected by the risks generally incident to the residential
construction business, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
the availability of mortgage financing; |
|
|
|
|
actual and expected direction of interest rates, which affect our
costs, the availability of construction financing, and long-term financing for
potential purchasers of homes; |
|
|
|
|
the availability of adequate land in desirable locations on favorable
terms; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in customer preferences; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in the national economy and in the local economies of the markets
in which we have operations. |
All of these risks are discussed in detail below.
The homebuilding industry is experiencing a significant downturn. The continuation of this
downturn could adversely affect our business and our results of operations.
The homebuilding industry has continued to experience a significant downturn as a result
of declining consumer confidence driven by an economic recession, affordability issues and
uncertainty as to the stability of home prices. Additionally, the tightening credit markets
have made it more difficult for customers to obtain financing to purchase homes. As a result,
we have experienced reduced demand for new homes, and we continue to experience an elevated
rate of sales contract cancellations. Our cancellation rate was approximately 23%, 21% and 19%
during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our cancellation rate was14% during the six months
ended June 30, 2009, which approximates our long-term normalized historical cancellation rate;
however, that rate may not be indicative of the full year
cancellation rate that we will experience for 2009. These ongoing market factors have also
resulted in pricing pressures and in turn lower gross profit margins in most of our markets. A
continued downturn in
39
the homebuilding industry could result in a material adverse effect on
our sales, resulting in fewer gross sales and/or higher cancellation rates, profitability,
stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
If the market value of our inventory or controlled lot position declines, our profit could decrease
and we may incur losses.
Inventory risk can be substantial for homebuilders. The market value of building lots and
housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions. In
addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses in a poorly
performing project or market. We must, in the ordinary course of our business, continuously
seek and make acquisitions of lots for expansion into new markets as well as for replacement
and expansion within our current markets, which is accomplished by us entering fixed price
purchase agreements and paying forfeitable deposits under the purchase agreement to developers
for the contractual right to acquire the lots. In the event of further adverse changes in
economic or market conditions, we may cease further building activities in communities or
restructure existing purchase agreements, resulting in forfeiture of some or all of any
remaining land contract deposit paid to the developer. Either action may result in a loss
which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability, stock performance, ability to
service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
Because almost all of our customers require mortgage financing, the availability of suitable
mortgage financing could impair the affordability of our homes, lower demand for our products, and
limit our ability to fully deliver our backlog.
Our business and earnings depend on the ability of our potential customers to obtain
mortgages for the purchase of our homes. In addition, many of our potential customers must
sell their existing homes in order to buy a home from us. The tightening of credit standards
and the availability of suitable mortgage financing could prevent customers from buying our
homes and could prevent buyers of our customers homes from obtaining mortgages they need to
complete that purchase, both of which could result in our potential customers inability to buy
a home from us. If our potential customers or the buyers of our customers current homes are
not able to obtain suitable financing, the result could have a material adverse effect on our
sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future
cash flows.
If our ability to sell mortgages to investors is impaired, we may be required to fund these
commitments ourselves, or may not be able to originate loans at all.
Our mortgage segment sells all of the loans it originates into the secondary market
usually within 30 days from the date of closing, and has up to approximately $110 million
available in a repurchase agreement to fund mortgage closings. In the event that disruptions to
the secondary markets similar to those which occurred during 2007 and 2008 continue to tighten
or eliminate the available liquidity within the secondary markets for mortgage loans, or the
underwriting requirements by our secondary market investors continue to become more stringent,
our ability to sell future mortgages could decline and we could be required, among other
things, to fund our commitments to our buyers with our own financial resources, which is
limited, or require our home buyers to find another source of financing. In addition,
government-sponsored enterprises, principally FNMA and FHLMC, play a significant role in buying
home mortgages and creating investment securities that they either sell to investors or hold in
their portfolios. These organizations provide liquidity to the secondary mortgage market. The
effects of the government takeover of FNMA and FHLMC are not yet certain and may restrict or
curtail their activities and further disrupt the secondary markets. The result of such
secondary market disruption could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability,
stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
40
Interest rate movements, inflation and other economic factors can negatively impact our business.
High rates of inflation generally affect the homebuilding industry adversely because of
their adverse impact on interest rates. High interest rates not only increase the cost of
borrowed funds to homebuilders but also have a significant effect on housing demand and on the
affordability of permanent mortgage financing to prospective purchasers. We are also subject
to potential volatility in the price of commodities that impact costs of materials used in our
homebuilding business. Increases in prevailing interest rates could have a material adverse
effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations
and future cash flows.
Our financial results also are affected by the risks generally incident to our mortgage
banking business, including interest rate levels, the impact of government regulation on
mortgage loan originations and servicing and the need to issue forward commitments to fund and
sell mortgage loans. Our homebuilding customers account for almost all of our mortgage banking
business. The volume of our continuing homebuilding operations therefore affects our mortgage
banking business.
Our mortgage banking business also is affected by interest rate fluctuations. We also may
experience marketing losses resulting from daily increases in interest rates to the extent we
are unable to match interest rates and amounts on loans we have committed to originate with
forward commitments from third parties to purchase such loans. Increases in interest rates may
have a material adverse effect on our mortgage banking revenue, profitability, stock
performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
Our operations may also be adversely affected by other economic factors within our markets
such as negative changes in employment levels, job growth, and consumer confidence and availability
of mortgage financing, one or all of which could result in reduced demand or price depression from
current levels. Such negative trends could have a material adverse effect on homebuilding
operations.
These factors and thus, the homebuilding business, have at times in the past been cyclical
in nature. Any downturn in the national economy or the local economies of the markets in which
we operate could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance
and ability to service our debt obligations. In particular, approximately 38% of our home
settlements during 2009 occurred in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD metropolitan areas,
which accounted for 48% of our homebuilding revenues in 2009. Thus, we are dependent to a
significant extent on the economy and demand for housing in those areas.
Our inability to secure and control an adequate inventory of lots could adversely impact our
operations.
The results of our homebuilding operations are dependent upon our continuing ability to
control an adequate number of homebuilding lots in desirable locations. There can be no
assurance that an adequate supply of building lots will continue to be available to us on terms
similar to those available in the past, or that we will not be required to devote a greater
amount of capital to controlling building lots than we have historically. An insufficient
supply of building lots in one or more of our markets, an inability of our developers to
deliver finished lots in a timely fashion due to their inability to secure financing to fund
development activities or for other reasons, or our inability to purchase or finance building
lots on reasonable terms could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability,
stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
Volatility in the credit and capital markets may impact our ability to access necessary
financing.
Our homebuilding operations are dependent in part on the availability and cost of working
capital financing, and may be adversely affected by a shortage or an increase in the cost of
such financing. If we
require working capital greater than that provided by our operations and our credit facility,
we may be required to seek to increase the amount available under the facility or to obtain
alternative financing. No
41
assurance can be given that additional or replacement financing will
be available on terms that are favorable or acceptable. Moreover, issues involving liquidity
and capital adequacy affecting our lenders could in turn affect our ability to fully access our
available credit facilities. In addition, the credit and capital markets are experiencing
significant volatility that is difficult to predict. If we are required to seek alternative
financing to fund our working capital requirements, continued volatility in these markets may
restrict our flexibility to access financing. If we are at any time unsuccessful in obtaining
sufficient capital to fund our planned homebuilding expenditures, we may experience a
substantial delay in the completion of any homes then under construction, or we may be unable
to control or purchase finished building lots. Any delay could result in cost increases and
could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to
service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
Our mortgage banking operations are dependent on the availability, cost and other terms of
mortgage financing facilities, and may be adversely affected by any shortage or increased cost
of such financing. No assurance can be given that any additional or replacement financing will
be available on terms that are favorable or acceptable. Our mortgage banking operations are
also dependent upon the securitization market for mortgage-backed securities, and could be
materially adversely affected by any fluctuation or downturn in such market.
Our current indebtedness may impact our future operations.
Our existing indebtedness contains financial and other restrictive covenants and any
future indebtedness may also contain covenants. These covenants include limitations on our
ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, pay cash
dividends and make distributions, make loans and investments, enter into transactions with
affiliates, effect certain asset sales, incur certain liens, merge or consolidate with any
other person, or transfer all or substantially all of our properties and assets. Substantial
losses by us or other action or inaction by us or our subsidiaries could result in the
violation of one or more of these covenants which could result in decreased liquidity or a
default on our indebtedness, thereby having a material adverse effect on our sales,
profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash
flows.
Government regulations and environmental matters could negatively affect our operations.
We are subject to various local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and
regulations concerning zoning, building design, construction and similar matters, including
local regulations that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the
number of homes that can eventually be built within the boundaries of a particular area. These
regulations may further increase the cost to produce and market our products. In addition, we
have from time to time been subject to, and may also be subject in the future to, periodic
delays in our homebuilding projects due to building moratoriums in the areas in which we
operate. Changes in regulations that restrict homebuilding activities in one or more of our
principal markets could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock
performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
We are also subject to a variety of local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules
and regulations concerning the protection of health and the environment. We are subject to a
variety of environmental conditions that can affect our business and our homebuilding projects.
The particular environmental laws that apply to any given homebuilding site vary greatly
according to the location and environmental condition of the site and the present and former
uses of the site and adjoining properties. Environmental laws and conditions may result in
delays, cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, or prohibit or severely
restrict homebuilding activity in certain environmentally sensitive regions or areas, thereby
adversely affecting our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt
obligations and future cash flows.
We are an approved seller/servicer of FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, FHA and VA mortgage loans, and
are subject to all of those agencies rules and regulations. Any significant impairment of our
eligibility to
42
sell/service these loans could have a material adverse impact on our mortgage
operations. In addition, we are subject to regulation at the state and federal level with
respect to specific origination, selling and servicing practices including the Real Estate
Settlement and Protection Act. Adverse changes in governmental regulation may have a negative
impact on our mortgage loan origination business.
We face competition in our housing and mortgage banking operations.
The homebuilding industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous homebuilders of
varying size, ranging from local to national in scope, some of whom have greater financial
resources than we do. We face competition:
|
|
|
for suitable and desirable lots at acceptable prices; |
|
|
|
|
from selling incentives offered by competing builders within and
across developments; and |
|
|
|
|
from the existing home resale market. |
Our homebuilding operations compete primarily on the basis of price, location, design,
quality, service and reputation.
The mortgage banking industry is also competitive. Our main competition comes from
national, regional and local mortgage bankers, thrifts, banks and mortgage brokers in each of
these markets. Our mortgage banking operations compete primarily on the basis of customer
service, variety of products offered, interest rates offered, prices of ancillary services and
relative financing availability and costs.
There can be no assurance that we will continue to compete successfully in our homebuilding or
mortgage banking operations. An inability to effectively compete may have an adverse impact on our
sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash
flows.
A shortage of building materials or labor, or increases in materials or labor costs may adversely
impact our operations.
The homebuilding business has from time to time experienced building material and labor
shortages, including shortages in insulation, drywall, certain carpentry work and concrete, as
well as fluctuating lumber prices and supply. In addition, high employment levels and strong
construction market conditions could restrict the labor force available to our subcontractors
and us in one or more of our markets. Significant increases in costs resulting from these
shortages, or delays in construction of homes, could have a material adverse effect upon our
sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future
cash flows.
Product liability litigation and warranty claims may adversely impact our operations.
Construction defect and home warranty claims are common and can represent a substantial
risk for the homebuilding industry. The cost of insuring against construction defect and
product liability claims, as well as the claims themselves, can be high. In addition,
insurance companies limit coverage offered to protect against these claims. Further
restrictions on coverage availability, or significant increases in premium costs or claims,
could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We are subject to litigation proceedings that could harm our business if an unfavorable ruling were
to occur.
From time to time, we may become involved in litigation and other legal proceedings relating
to claims arising from our operations in the normal course of business. As described in Part I,
Item 3, Legal Proceedings of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008, we are
currently subject to certain legal proceedings. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties,
and unfavorable rulings may occur. We cannot assure you that these or other litigation or legal
proceedings will not materially
43
affect our ability to conduct our business in the manner that we
expect or otherwise adversely affect us should an unfavorable ruling occur.
Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of tax laws may negatively affect our operating results.
The effects of possible changes in the tax laws or changes in their interpretation could
have a material negative impact on our financial results.
Certain of our net deferred tax assets could be substantially limited if we experience an ownership
change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.
Certain of our net deferred tax assets give rise to built-in losses (BILs). Our ability to
utilize BILs and to offset our future taxable income and/or to recover previously paid taxes would
be limited if we were to undergo an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code, which we refer to as the Code. In general, an ownership change occurs
whenever the percentage of the stock of a corporation owned by 5-percent shareholders (within the
meaning of Section 382 of the Code) increases by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest
percentage of the stock of such corporation owned by such 5-percent shareholders at any time over
the preceding three years.
An ownership change under Section 382 of the Code would establish an annual limitation on the
amount of BILs we could utilize to offset our taxable income in any single taxable year to an
amount equal to (i) the product of a specified rate, which is published by the U.S. Treasury, and
the aggregate value of our outstanding stock plus (ii) the amount of unutilized limitation from
prior years. The application of these limitations might prevent full utilization of the deferred
tax assets attributable to our BILs. We do not believe we have experienced an ownership change as
defined by Section 382 and, therefore, we do not believe the BILs are subject to any Section 382
limitation. However, whether a change in ownership occurs in the future is largely outside of our
control, and there can be no assurance that such a change will not occur.
Weather-related and other events beyond our control may adversely impact our operations.
Extreme weather or other events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, forest
fires, floods, terrorist attacks or war, may affect our markets, our operations and our
profitability. These events may impact our physical facilities or those of our suppliers or
subcontractors, causing us material increases in costs, or delays in construction of homes,
which could have a material adverse effect upon our sales, profitability, stock performance,
ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
We had one repurchase authorization outstanding during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. On
July 31, 2007 (July Authorization), we publicly announced the board of directors approval for
us to repurchase up to an aggregate of $300 million of our common stock in one or more open
market and/or privately negotiated transactions. The July Authorization does not have an
expiration date. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the second quarter
of 2009. We have $226.3 million available under the July Authorization as of June 30, 2009.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 5, 2009. There were 5,709,599 shares of
NVR, Inc. common stock eligible to vote at the 2009 Annual Meeting. The following are the matters
voted upon at the Annual Meeting and the results of the votes on such matters:
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
1. |
|
Election of
three directors to
serve
three-year terms: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy M. Donahue |
|
|
5,153,800 |
|
|
|
55,773 |
|
|
|
166,916 |
|
|
|
William A. Moran |
|
|
4,705,065 |
|
|
|
507,284 |
|
|
|
164,140 |
|
|
|
Alfred E. Festa |
|
|
5,156,678 |
|
|
|
51,951 |
|
|
|
167,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
2. |
|
Election of one director to serve
a two-year term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Grady Rosier |
|
|
5,143,423 |
|
|
|
65,210 |
|
|
|
167,856 |
|
C. E. Andrews, Robert C. Butler, Manuel H. Johnson, David A. Preiser, Dwight C. Schar, John M.
Toups and Paul W. Whetsell continued as directors after the Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
3. |
|
Ratification of appointment of
KPMG LLP as independent registered
public accountants for NVR for 2009 |
|
|
5,187,676 |
|
|
|
24,544 |
|
|
|
164,269 |
|
The shareholder proponent who had submitted a proposal to require our named executive
officers to hold 75% of their equity compensation until at least two years following termination
of employment submitted a letter to us dated April 29, 2009 withdrawing the proposal and did not
appear at the Annual Meeting to present the proposal for a shareholder vote. Had the proposal
been presented at the Annual Meeting, management held proxies to vote 3,435,721 shares, or
approximately 70% of the shares voting on the proposal by proxy, against the shareholder
proposal.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
(a) |
|
Exhibits: |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32 |
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
45
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 29, 2009 |
|
NVR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Dennis M. Seremet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis M. Seremet |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer |
|
|
46
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of NVRs Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
50 |
|
47
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS
I, Paul C. Saville, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of NVR, Inc.; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 29, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Paul C. Saville
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul C. Saville |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
48
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS
I, Dennis M. Seremet, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of NVR, Inc.; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 29, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Dennis M. Seremet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis M. Seremet |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer |
|
|
49
exv32
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NVR, Inc. for the period ended June 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned officers of NVR, Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|
1. |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
2. |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NVR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 29, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Paul C. Saville
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul C. Saville |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Dennis M. Seremet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis M. Seremet |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer |
|
|
50