UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)

For the transition period from                      to                     

NVR, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia		54-1394360
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS employer identification number)

11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500
Reston, Virginia		20190
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (703) 956-4000

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share		New York Stock Exchange
5% Senior Notes due 2010		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):

Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of NVR, Inc. on June 30, 2008, the last business day of NVR, Inc.’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $2,424,016,000.

As of February 19, 2009 there were 5,705,599 total shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement of NVR, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on or prior to April 30, 2009 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

 

 

INDEX

		Page
PART I
Item 1. Business			2
Item 1A. Risk Factors			6
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments			11
Item 2. Properties			11
Item 3. Legal Proceedings			12
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			12
Executive Officers of the Registrant			12
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants’ Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			13
Item 6. Selected Financial Data			15
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			16
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk			37
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			40
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure			40
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures			40
Item 9B. Other Information			40
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance			41
Item 11. Executive Compensation			41
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters			41
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			42
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services			42
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules			42

PART I

Item 1. Business.

General

     NVR, Inc. (“NVR”) was formed in 1980 as NVHomes, Inc. Our primary business is the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings. To fully serve customers of our homebuilding operations, we also operate a mortgage banking business. We conduct our homebuilding activities directly, except for Rymarc Homes, which is operated as a wholly owned subsidiary. Our mortgage banking operations are operated primarily through a wholly owned subsidiary, NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (“NVRM”). Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “NVR”, “we”, “us” or “our” include NVR and its consolidated subsidiaries.

     We are one of the largest homebuilders in the United States. While we operate in multiple locations in twelve states, primarily in the eastern part of the United States, approximately 34% of our home settlements in 2008 occurred in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD metropolitan areas, which accounted for 45% of our 2008 homebuilding revenues. Our homebuilding operations include the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings under four trade names: Ryan Homes, NVHomes, Fox Ridge Homes and Rymarc Homes. The Ryan Homes, Fox Ridge Homes, and Rymarc Homes products are marketed primarily to first-time homeowners and first-time move-up buyers. The Ryan Homes product is currently sold in twenty metropolitan areas located in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Ohio, New Jersey, Delaware and Kentucky. The Fox Ridge Homes product is sold solely in the Nashville, TN metropolitan area and the Rymarc Homes product is sold solely in the Columbia, SC metropolitan area. The NVHomes product is marketed primarily to move-up and upscale buyers and is sold in the Washington, D.C., Baltimore, MD, Philadelphia, PA and the Maryland Eastern Shore metropolitan areas. In 2008, our average price of a settled unit was approximately $338,000.

     We do not engage in land development. Instead, we acquire finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under fixed price purchase agreements (“purchase agreements”) that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the purchase agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage, typically ranging up to 10%, of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots.

     Our lot acquisition strategy avoids the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and land development. We may, at our option, choose for any reason and at any time not to perform under these purchase agreements by delivering notice of our intent not to acquire the finished lots under contract. Our sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under these purchase agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidating damage provision contained within the purchase agreements. We do not have any financial guarantees or completion obligations and we do not guarantee lot purchases on a specific performance basis under these purchase agreements. We generally seek to maintain control over a supply of lots believed to be suitable to meet our five-year business plan.

     On a very limited basis, we also obtain finished lots using joint venture limited liability corporations (“LLCs”). All LLCs are structured such that we are a non-controlling member and are at risk only for the amount we have invested. We are not a borrower, guarantor or obligor on any of the LLCs debt. We enter into a standard fixed price purchase agreement to purchase lots from these LLCs. At December 31, 2008, we had an aggregate investment totaling approximately $8 million in nine separate LLCs and we had recorded an impairment reserve equal to our total investment in these LLCs.

     In addition to building and selling homes, we provide a number of mortgage-related services through our mortgage banking operations. Through operations in each of our homebuilding markets, NVRM originates mortgage loans almost exclusively for our homebuyers. NVRM generates revenues primarily from origination fees, gains on sales of loans and title fees. NVRM sells all of the mortgage loans it closes into the secondary markets on a servicing released basis.

     Segment information for our homebuilding and mortgage banking businesses is included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

Current Business Environment

     Market conditions within the homebuilding industry continued to deteriorate throughout 2008. The slowdown, which began in the second half of 2005 has been driven by the economic recession which has led to continued declining consumer confidence, affordability issues and instability within the credit markets. As demand for new homes has slowed, the industry has been faced with higher levels of new and existing home inventories. Additionally, existing home inventories have been adversely affected by rising foreclosure rates in 2008. Each of these market factors has resulted in an extremely competitive sales environment and has forced us and our competitors to reduce prices and offer sales incentives. In turn, our home sales and profit margins have been negatively impacted when compared to prior years. We expect the current challenging market conditions to continue in 2009. For additional information and analysis of recent trends in our operations and financial condition, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

Homebuilding

     Products

     We offer single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings with many different basic home designs. These home designs have a variety of elevations and numerous other options. Our homes combine traditional or colonial exterior designs with contemporary interior designs and amenities, generally include two to four bedrooms, and range from approximately 1,000 to 7,300 square feet. During 2008, the prices at which we settled homes ranged from approximately $43,000 to $2,000,000 and averaged approximately $338,000. During 2007, our average price was approximately $373,000.

     Markets

     Our four reportable homebuilding segments operate in the following geographic regions:

Mid Atlantic:		Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia and Delaware
North East:		New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania
Mid East:		Kentucky, New York, Ohio and western Pennsylvania
South East:		North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee

     Further discussion of settlements, new orders and backlog activity by homebuilding reportable segment for each of the last three years can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

     Backlog

     Backlog totaled 3,164 units and approximately $1.0 billion at December 31, 2008 compared to backlog of 5,145 units and approximately $1.9 billion at December 31, 2007. Our cancellation rate was approximately 23% during 2008. During 2007 and 2006, our cancellation rates were approximately 21% and 19%, respectively. We can provide no assurance that our historical cancellation rate is indicative of the actual cancellation rate that may occur in 2009, and our cancellation rate could continue to increase. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A.

     Construction

     We utilize independent subcontractors under fixed price contracts to perform construction work on our homes. The subcontractors’ work is performed under the supervision of our employees who monitor quality control. We use several independent subcontractors in our various markets and we are not dependent on any single subcontractor or on a small number of subcontractors.

     Land Development

     We do not engage in land development. Instead, we purchase finished lots from various land developers under fixed price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage, typically ranging up to 10%, of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. We are not dependent on any single developer or on a small number of developers.

     Sales and Marketing

     Our preferred marketing method is for customers to visit a furnished model home featuring many built-in options and a landscaped lot. The garages of these model homes are usually converted into temporary sales centers where alternative facades and floor plans are displayed and designs for other models are available for review. Sales representatives are compensated predominantly on a commission basis.

     Regulation

     We and our subcontractors must comply with various federal, state and local zoning, building, environmental, advertising and consumer credit statutes, rules and regulations, as well as other regulations and requirements in connection with our construction and sales activities. All of these regulations have increased the cost to produce and market our products, and in some instances, have delayed our developers’ abilities to deliver us finished lots. Counties and cities in which we build homes have at times declared moratoriums on the issuance of building permits and imposed other restrictions in the areas in which sewage treatment facilities and other public facilities do not reach minimum standards. To date, restrictive zoning laws and the imposition of moratoriums have not had a material adverse effect on our construction activities. However, in certain markets in which we operate, we believe that our growth has been hampered by the longer time periods necessary for our developers to obtain the necessary governmental approvals.

     Competition and Market Factors

     The housing industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous homebuilders of varying size, ranging from local to national in scope, some of which have greater financial resources than we do. We also face competition from the home resale market. Our homebuilding operations compete primarily on the basis of price, location, design, quality, service and reputation. Historically we have been one of the market leaders in each of the markets where we build homes.

     The housing industry is cyclical and is affected by consumer confidence levels, prevailing economic conditions and interest rates. Other factors that affect the housing industry and the demand for new homes include the availability and the cost of land, labor and materials; changes in consumer preferences; demographic trends; and the availability of mortgage finance programs. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A.

     We are dependent upon building material suppliers for a continuous flow of raw materials. Whenever possible, we utilize standard products available from multiple sources. In the past, such raw materials have been generally available to us in adequate supply.

Mortgage Banking

     We provide a number of mortgage related services to our homebuilding customers through our mortgage banking operations. Our mortgage banking operations also include separate subsidiaries that broker title insurance and perform title searches in connection with mortgage loan closings for which they receive commissions and fees. Because NVRM originates mortgage loans almost exclusively for our homebuilding customers, NVRM is dependent on our homebuilding segment. In 2008, NVRM closed approximately 8,600 loans with an aggregate principal amount of approximately $2.4 billion as compared to 10,600 loans with an aggregate principal amount of approximately $3.2 billion in 2007.

     NVRM sells all of the mortgage loans it closes to investors in the secondary markets on a servicing released basis, typically within 30 days from the loan closing. NVRM is an approved seller/servicer for FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, VA and FHA mortgage loans.

     Competition and Market Factors

     NVRM’s main competition comes from national, regional, and local mortgage bankers, mortgage brokers, thrifts and banks in each of these markets. NVRM competes primarily on the basis of customer service, variety of products offered, interest rates offered, prices of ancillary services and relative financing availability and costs.

     Regulation

     NVRM is an approved seller/servicer of FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, FHA and VA mortgage loans, and is subject to all of those agencies’ rules and regulations. These rules and regulations restrict certain activities of NVRM. NVRM is currently eligible and expects to remain eligible to participate in such programs. In addition, NVRM is subject to regulation at the state and federal level with respect to specific origination, selling and servicing practices.

     Pipeline

     NVRM’s mortgage loans in process that have not closed (“Pipeline”) at December 31, 2008 and 2007, had an aggregate principal balance of $730 million and $1.2 billion, respectively. Our cancellation rate was approximately 49% in 2008. During 2007 and 2006, our loan cancellation rates were approximately 45% and 35%, respectively. We can provide no assurance that the prior year loan cancellation rate is indicative of the actual loan cancellation rate that may occur in 2009, and our loan cancellation rate could continue to increase. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A.

Employees

     At December 31, 2008, we employed 2,845 full-time persons, of whom 1,032 were officers and management personnel, 190 were technical and construction personnel, 645 were sales personnel, 426 were administrative personnel and 552 were engaged in various other service and labor activities. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our employee relations are good.

NYSE Certification

     We submitted our Annual CEO Certification to the New Your Stock Exchange on May 7, 2008. The certification was filed without qualification.

Available Information

     We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document we file at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room.

     Our principal Internet website can be found at http://www.nvrinc.com. We make available free of charge on or through our website, access to our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed, or furnished, to the SEC.

     Our website also includes a corporate governance section which contains our Corporate Governance Guidelines (which includes our Directors’ Independence Standards), Code of Ethics, Board of Directors’ Committee Charters for the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance, Nominating and Qualified Legal Compliance Committees, Policies and Procedures for the Consideration of Board of Director Candidates and Policies and Procedures on Security Holder Communications with the Board of Directors. Additionally, amendments to and waivers from a provision of the Code of Ethics that apply to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions will be disclosed on our website. On January 2, 2008, in connection with the transfer of the listing of our common stock to the New York Stock Exchange, we amended the Code of Ethics to include the following four topics that were not previously included in the Code of Ethics: (1) confidential, proprietary and inside information, (2) corporate opportunities, (3) competition and fair dealing, and (4) personal use or acquisition of company property and supplies. Previously, these topics were included in the NVR, Inc. Standards of Business Conduct, which are in addition to the Code of Ethics.

     In addition, you may request a copy of the foregoing filings (excluding exhibits), charters, guidelines and codes, and any waivers or amendments to such codes which are applicable to our executive officers, senior financial officers or directors, at no cost by writing to us at NVR, Inc., 11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20190, Attention: Investor Relations Department or by telephoning us at (703) 956-4000.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Forward-Looking Statements

     Some of the statements in this Form 10-K, as well as statements made by us in periodic press releases or other public communications, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Certain, but not necessarily all, of such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. All statements other than of historical facts are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements contained in this document include those regarding market trends, NVR’s financial position, business strategy, the outcome of pending litigation, projected plans and objectives of management for future operations. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results or performance of NVR to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such risk factors include, but are not limited to the following: general economic and business conditions (on both a national and regional level); interest rate changes; access to suitable financing by NVR and NVR’s customers; competition; the availability and cost of land and other raw materials used by NVR in its homebuilding operations; shortages of labor; weather related slow-downs; building moratoriums; governmental regulation; the ability of NVR to integrate any acquired business; fluctuation and volatility of stock and other financial markets; mortgage financing availability; and other factors over which NVR has little or no control.

RISK FACTORS

     Our business is affected by the risks generally incident to the residential construction business, including, but not limited to:

	•		the availability of mortgage financing;
	•		actual and expected direction of interest rates, which affect our costs, the availability of construction financing, and long-term financing for potential purchasers of homes;
	•		the availability of adequate land in desirable locations on favorable terms;
	•		unexpected changes in customer preferences; and
	•		changes in the national economy and in the local economies of the markets in which we have operations.

All of these risks are discussed in detail below.

The homebuilding industry is experiencing a significant downturn. The continuation of this downturn could adversely affect our business and our results of operations.

     The homebuilding industry has continued to experience a significant downturn as a result of declining consumer confidence driven by an economic recession, affordability issues and uncertainty as to the stability of home prices. Additionally, the tightening credit markets have made it more difficult for customers to obtain financing to purchase homes. As a result, we have experienced reduced demand for new homes. These market factors have also resulted in pricing pressures and in turn lower gross profit margins in most of our markets. A continued downturn in the homebuilding industry could result in a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

If the market value of our inventory or controlled lot position declines, our profit could decrease and we may incur losses.

     Inventory risk can be substantial for homebuilders. The market value of building lots and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions. In addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses in a poorly performing project or market. We must, in the ordinary course of our business, continuously seek and make acquisitions of lots for expansion into new markets as well as for replacement and expansion within our current markets, which is accomplished by us entering fixed price purchase agreements and paying forfeitable deposits under the purchase agreement to developers for the contractual right to acquire the lots. In the event of further adverse changes in economic or market conditions, we may cease further building activities in communities or restructure existing purchase agreements, resulting in forfeiture of some or all of any remaining land contract deposit paid to the developer. Either action may result in a loss which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

Because almost all of our customers require mortgage financing, the availability of suitable mortgage financing could impair the affordability of our homes, lower demand for our products, and limit our ability to fully deliver our backlog.

     Our business and earnings depend on the ability of our potential customers to obtain mortgages for the purchase of our homes. In addition, many of our potential customers must sell their existing homes in order to buy a home from us. The tightening of credit standards and the availability of suitable mortgage financing could prevent customers from buying our homes and could prevent buyers of our customers’ homes from obtaining mortgages they need to complete that purchase, both of which could result in our potential customers’ inability to buy a home from us. If our potential customers or the buyers of our customers’ current homes are not able to obtain suitable financing, the result could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

If our ability to sell mortgages to investors is impaired, we may be required to fund these commitments ourselves, or may not be able to originate loans at all.

     Our mortgage segment sells all of the loans it originates into the secondary market usually within 30 days from the date of closing, and has up to approximately $110 million available in a repurchase agreement to fund mortgage closings. In the event that disruptions to the secondary markets similar to those which occurred during 2007 and 2008 continue to tighten or eliminate the available liquidity within the secondary markets for mortgage loans, or the underwriting requirements by our secondary market investors continue to become more stringent, our ability to sell future mortgages could decline and we could be required, among other things, to fund our commitments to our buyers with our own financial resources, which is limited, or require our home buyers to find another source of financing. In addition, government-sponsored enterprises, principally FNMA and FHLMC, play a significant role in buying home mortgages and creating investment securities that they either sell to investors or hold in their portfolios. These organizations provide liquidity to the secondary mortgage market. The effects of the government takeover of FNMA and FHLMC are not yet certain and may restrict or curtail their activities and further disrupt the secondary markets. The result of such secondary market disruption could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

Interest rate movements, inflation and other economic factors can negatively impact our business.

     High rates of inflation generally affect the homebuilding industry adversely because of their adverse impact on interest rates. High interest rates not only increase the cost of borrowed funds to homebuilders but also have a significant effect on housing demand and on the affordability of permanent mortgage financing to prospective purchasers. We are also subject to potential volatility in the price of commodities that impact costs of materials used in our homebuilding business. Increases in prevailing interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

     Our financial results also are affected by the risks generally incident to our mortgage banking business, including interest rate levels, the impact of government regulation on mortgage loan originations and servicing and the need to issue forward commitments to fund and sell mortgage loans. Our homebuilding customers account for almost all of our mortgage banking business. The volume of our continuing homebuilding operations therefore affects our mortgage banking business.

     Our mortgage banking business also is affected by interest rate fluctuations. We also may experience marketing losses resulting from daily increases in interest rates to the extent we are unable to match interest rates and amounts on loans we have committed to originate with forward commitments from third parties to purchase such loans. Increases in interest rates may have a material adverse effect on our mortgage banking revenue, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

     Our operations may also be adversely affected by other economic factors within our markets such as negative changes in employment levels, job growth, and consumer confidence and availability of mortgage financing, one or all of which could result in reduced demand or price depression from current levels. Such negative trends could have a material adverse effect on homebuilding operations.

     These factors and thus, the homebuilding business, have at times in the past been cyclical in nature. Any downturn in the national economy or the local economies of the markets in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations. In particular, approximately 34% of our home settlements during 2008 occurred in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD metropolitan areas, which accounted for 45% of our homebuilding revenues in 2008. Thus, we are dependent to a significant extent on the economy and demand for housing in those areas.

Our inability to secure and control an adequate inventory of lots could adversely impact our operations.

     The results of our homebuilding operations are dependent upon our continuing ability to control an adequate number of homebuilding lots in desirable locations. There can be no assurance that an adequate supply of building lots will continue to be available to us on terms similar to those available in the past, or that we will not be required to devote a greater amount of capital to controlling building lots than we have historically. An insufficient supply of building lots in one or more of our markets, an inability of our developers to deliver finished lots in a timely fashion due to their inability to secure financing to fund development activities or for other reasons, or our inability to purchase or finance building lots on reasonable terms could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

Volatility in the credit and capital markets may impact our ability to access necessary financing.

     Our homebuilding operations are dependent in part on the availability and cost of working capital financing, and may be adversely affected by a shortage or an increase in the cost of such financing. If we require working capital greater than that provided by our operations and our credit facility, we may be required to seek to increase the amount available under the facility or to obtain alternative financing. No assurance can be given that additional or replacement financing will be available on terms that are favorable or acceptable. Moreover, issues involving liquidity and capital adequacy affecting our lenders could in turn affect our ability to fully access our available credit facilities. In addition, the credit and capital markets are experiencing significant volatility that is difficult to predict. If we are required to seek alternative financing to fund our working capital requirements, continued volatility in these markets may restrict our flexibility to access financing. If we are at any time unsuccessful in obtaining sufficient capital to fund our planned homebuilding expenditures, we may experience a substantial delay in the completion of any homes then under construction, or we may be unable to control or purchase finished building lots. Any delay could result in cost increases and could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

     Our mortgage banking operations are dependent on the availability, cost and other terms of mortgage financing facilities, and may be adversely affected by any shortage or increased cost of such financing. No assurance can be given that any additional or replacement financing will be available on terms that are favorable or acceptable. Our mortgage banking operations are also dependent upon the securitization market for mortgage-backed securities, and could be materially adversely affected by any fluctuation or downturn in such market.

Our current indebtedness may impact our future operations.

     Our existing indebtedness contains financial and other restrictive covenants and any future indebtedness may also contain covenants. These covenants include limitations on our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, pay cash dividends and make distributions, make loans and investments, enter into transactions with affiliates, effect certain asset sales, incur certain liens, merge or consolidate with any other person, or transfer all or substantially all of our properties and assets. Substantial losses by us or other action or inaction by us or our subsidiaries could result in the violation of one or more of these covenants which could result in decreased liquidity or a default on our indebtedness, thereby having a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

Government regulations and environmental matters could negatively affect our operations.

     We are subject to various local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, building design, construction and similar matters, including local regulations that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the number of homes that can eventually be built within the boundaries of a particular area. These regulations may further increase the cost to produce and market our products. In addition, we have from time to time been subject to, and may also be subject in the future to, periodic delays in our homebuilding projects due to building moratoriums in the areas in which we operate. Changes in regulations that restrict homebuilding activities in one or more of our principal markets could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

     We are also subject to a variety of local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the protection of health and the environment. We are subject to a variety of environmental conditions that can affect our business and our homebuilding projects. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given homebuilding site vary greatly according to the location and environmental condition of the site and the present and former uses of the site and adjoining properties. Environmental laws and conditions may result in delays, cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, or prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding activity in certain environmentally sensitive regions or areas, thereby adversely affecting our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

     We are an approved seller/servicer of FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, FHA and VA mortgage loans, and are subject to all of those agencies’ rules and regulations. Any significant impairment of our eligibility to sell/service these loans could have a material adverse impact on our mortgage operations. In addition, we are subject to regulation at the state and federal level with respect to specific origination, selling and servicing practices including the Real Estate Settlement and Protection Act. Adverse changes in governmental regulation may have a negative impact on our mortgage loan origination business.

We face competition in our housing and mortgage banking operations.

     The homebuilding industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous homebuilders of varying size, ranging from local to national in scope, some of whom have greater financial resources than we do. We face competition:

	•		for suitable and desirable lots at acceptable prices;
	•		from selling incentives offered by competing builders within and across developments; and
	•		from the existing home resale market.

     Our homebuilding operations compete primarily on the basis of price, location, design, quality, service and reputation.

     The mortgage banking industry is also competitive. Our main competition comes from national, regional and local mortgage bankers, thrifts, banks and mortgage brokers in each of these markets. Our mortgage banking operations compete primarily on the basis of customer service, variety of products offered, interest rates offered, prices of ancillary services and relative financing availability and costs.

     There can be no assurance that we will continue to compete successfully in our homebuilding or mortgage banking operations. An inability to effectively compete may have an adverse impact on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

A shortage of building materials or labor, or increases in materials or labor costs may adversely impact our operations.

     The homebuilding business has from time to time experienced building material and labor shortages, including shortages in insulation, drywall, certain carpentry work and concrete, as well as fluctuating lumber prices and supply. In addition, high employment levels and strong construction market conditions could restrict the labor force available to our subcontractors and us in one or more of our markets. Significant increases in costs resulting from these shortages, or delays in construction of homes, could have a material adverse effect upon our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

Product liability litigation and warranty claims may adversely impact our operations.

     Construction defect and home warranty claims are common and can represent a substantial risk for the homebuilding industry. The cost of insuring against construction defect and product liability claims, as well as the claims themselves, can be high. In addition, insurance companies limit coverage offered to protect against these claims. Further restrictions on coverage availability, or significant increases in premium costs or claims, could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

We are subject to litigation proceedings that could harm our business if an unfavorable ruling were to occur.

     From time to time, we may become involved in litigation and other legal proceedings relating to claims arising from our operations in the normal course of business. As described in, but not limited to, Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” of this 10-K, we are currently subject to certain legal proceedings. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings may occur. We cannot assure you that these or other litigation or legal proceedings will not materially affect our ability to conduct our business in the manner that we expect or otherwise adversely affect us should an unfavorable ruling occur.

Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of tax laws may negatively affect our operating results.

     The effects of possible changes in the tax laws or changes in their interpretation could have a material negative impact on our financial results.

Weather-related and other events beyond our control may adversely impact our operations.

     Extreme weather or other events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, forest fires, floods, terrorist attacks or war, may affect our markets, our operations and our profitability. These events may impact our physical facilities or those of our suppliers or subcontractors, causing us material increases in costs, or delays in construction of homes, which could have a material adverse effect upon our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

     Our corporate offices are located in Reston, Virginia, where we currently lease approximately 61,000 square feet of office space, of which approximately 9,800 square feet we have subleased to a third party. The current corporate office lease expires in April 2015.

     In connection with the operation of the homebuilding segment, we lease manufacturing facilities in the following six locations: Thurmont, Maryland; Burlington County, New Jersey; Farmington, New York; Kings Mountain, North Carolina; Darlington, Pennsylvania; and Portland, Tennessee. These facilities range in size from approximately 40,000 square feet to 400,000 square feet and combined total approximately 1,000,000 square feet of manufacturing space. Each of these leases contains various options for extensions of the lease and for the purchase of the facility. The Portland lease expires in 2009. The Thurmont and Farmington leases expire in 2014, and the Kings Mountain and Burlington County leases expire in 2023 and 2024, respectively. The Darlington lease expires in 2025. Due to the economic downturn and the related decline in our homebuilding activity, our current plant utilization has dropped to approximately 40% of total capacity.

     We also, in connection with both our homebuilding and mortgage banking businesses, lease office space in multiple locations for homebuilding divisional offices and mortgage banking and title services branches under leases expiring at various times through 2014, none of which are individually material to our business. We anticipate that, upon expiration of existing leases, we will be able to renew them or obtain comparable facilities on acceptable terms.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

     On July 18, 2007, former employees filed lawsuits against us in the Court of Common Pleas in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania and Hamilton County, Ohio, in the Superior Court in Durham County, North Carolina, and in the Circuit Court in Montgomery County, Maryland, and on July 19, 2007 in the Superior Court in New Jersey, alleging that we incorrectly classified our sales and marketing representatives as being exempt from overtime wages. These lawsuits are similar in nature to another lawsuit filed on October 29, 2004 by another former employee in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. The complaints seek injunctive relief, an award of unpaid wages, including fringe benefits, liquidated damages equal to the overtime wages allegedly due and not paid, attorney and other fees and interest, and where available, multiple damages. The suits were filed as purported class actions. However, none of the groups of employees that the lawsuits purport to represent have been certified as a class. The lawsuits filed in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland and New Jersey have been stayed pending further developments in the New York action.

     We believe that our compensation practices in regard to sales and marketing representatives are entirely lawful and in compliance with two letter rulings from the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued in January 2007. The two courts to most recently consider similar claims against other homebuilders have acknowledged the DOL’s position that sales and marketing representatives were properly classified as exempt from overtime wages and the only court to have directly addressed the exempt status of such employees concluded that the DOL’s position was valid. Accordingly, we have vigorously defended and intend to continue to vigorously defend these lawsuits. Because we are unable to determine the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome of this case, or the amount of damages, if any, we have not recorded any associated liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet.

     We are also involved in various other litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, and based on advice of legal counsel, this litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

     No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended December 31, 2008.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Name		Age		Positions
Dwight C. Schar		67		Chairman of the Board of NVR
Paul C. Saville		53		President and Chief Executive Officer of NVR
William J. Inman		61		President of NVRM
Dennis M. Seremet		53		Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of NVR
Robert W. Henley		42		Vice President and Controller of NVR

Dwight C. Schar relinquished the title of Executive Officer effective February 4, 2009, but will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Schar’s revised role continues the leadership transition that separated the roles of Chairman and CEO to strengthen the operating and governance structure of the Company. Mr. Schar has been Chairman of the Board since September 30, 1993. Mr. Schar also served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from September 30, 1993 through June 30, 2005.

Paul C. Saville was named President and Chief Executive Officer of NVR, effective July 1, 2005. Prior to July 1, 2005, Mr. Saville had served as Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of NVR since September 30, 1993 and Executive Vice President from January 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005.

William J. Inman has been President of NVRM since January 1992.

Dennis M. Seremet was named Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of NVR, effective July 1, 2005 and Senior Vice President effective December 14, 2007. Prior to July 1, 2005, Mr. Seremet had been Vice President and Controller of NVR since April 1, 1995.

Robert W. Henley was named Vice President and Controller of NVR effective July 1, 2005. From May 2000 to June 30, 2005, Mr. Henley was the Assistant Controller.

PART II

Item 5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

     Our shares of common stock are listed and principally traded on the New York Stock Exchange effective January 2, 2008. Prior to that date, our shares of common stock were listed and principally traded on the American Stock Exchange. The following table sets forth the high and low prices per share for our common stock for each fiscal quarter during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:

		HIGH				LOW
Prices per Share:
2008
Fourth Quarter		$	600.00			$	316.82
Third Quarter		$	639.80			$	452.00
Second Quarter		$	679.37			$	498.00
First Quarter		$	661.00			$	436.20
2007
Fourth Quarter		$	578.00			$	398.96
Third Quarter		$	728.45			$	442.20
Second Quarter		$	851.96			$	658.61
First Quarter		$	747.00			$	585.00

     As of the close of business on February 19, 2009, there were 401 shareholders of record.

     We have never paid a cash dividend on our shares of common stock. Our bank indebtedness contains certain restrictive covenants, which limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock. For additional information, see the discussion of the restrictive covenants in the Liquidity and Capital Resources discussion of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in Part II, Item 7 of the Form 10-K.

     We had one repurchase authorization outstanding during the quarter ended December 31, 2008. On July 31, 2007 (“July Authorization”), we publicly announced the Board of Directors’ approval for us to repurchase up to an aggregate of $300 million of our common stock in one or more open market and/or privately negotiated transactions. The July Authorization does not have an expiration date. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2008. We have $226.3 million available under the July Authorization as of December 31, 2008.

Stock Performance Graph

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL EQUITYHOLDER RETURN ON EQUITY

     The following chart graphs our performance in the form of cumulative total return to holders of our Common Stock since December 31, 2003 in comparison to the Dow/Home Construction Index and the Dow Jones Industrial Index for that same period. The Dow/Home Construction Index is comprised of NVR, Inc., Pulte Homes, Inc., Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Ryland Group, Inc., Centex Corp., KB Home, Champion Enterprises, Inc., Lennar Corp., DR Horton, Inc., MDC Holdings, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Standard Pacific Corp., Meritage Homes Corp. and Toll Brothers, Inc.

(a)

Assumes that $100 was invested in NVR stock and the indices on December 31, 2003.

Item 6.		Selected Financial Data. (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

     The following tables set forth selected consolidated financial data. The selected income statement and balance sheet data have been derived from our consolidated financial statements for each of the periods presented and is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008				2007				2006				2005				2004
Consolidated Income Statement Data:
Homebuilding data:
Revenues		$	3,638,702			$	5,048,187			$	6,036,236			$	5,177,743			$	4,247,503
Gross profit			457,692				821,128				1,334,971				1,439,713				1,091,217
Mortgage Banking data:
Mortgage banking fees			54,337				81,155				97,888				84,604				72,219
Interest income			3,955				4,900				7,704				5,014				4,249
Interest expense			754				681				2,805				1,759				1,088
Consolidated data:
Income from continuing operations (1)		$	100,892			$	333,955			$	587,412			$	697,559			$	523,204
Income from continuing operations per diluted share (2)		$	17.04			$	54.14			$	88.05			$	89.61			$	66.42

		December 31,
		2008				2007				2006				2005				2004
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Homebuilding inventory		$	400,570			$	688,854			$	733,616			$	793,975			$	588,540
Contract land deposits, net			29,073				188,528				402,170				517,241				362,990
Total assets			2,103,236				2,194,416				2,473,808				2,237,669				1,755,998
Notes and loans payable			210,389				286,283				356,632				463,141				213,803
Shareholders’ equity			1,373,789				1,129,375				1,152,074				677,162				834,995
Cash dividends per share			—				—				—				—				—

Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006

Overview

Business

     Our primary business is the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings. To fully serve customers of our homebuilding operations, we also operate a mortgage banking and title services business. We primarily conduct our operations in mature supply-constrained markets. Additionally, we generally grow our business through market share gains in our existing markets and by expanding into markets contiguous to our current active markets. Our four homebuilding reportable segments consist of the following regions:

Mid Atlantic:		Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia and Delaware
North East:		New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania
Mid East:		Kentucky, New York, Ohio and western Pennsylvania
South East:		North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee

     We believe we operate our business with a conservative operating strategy. We do not engage in land development and primarily construct homes on a pre-sold basis. This strategy allows us to maximize inventory turnover, which enables us to minimize market risk and to operate with less capital, thereby enhancing rates of return on equity and total capital. In addition, we focus on obtaining and maintaining a leading market position in each market we serve. This strategy allows us to gain valuable efficiencies and competitive advantages in our markets, which we believe contributes to minimizing the adverse effects of regional economic cycles and provides growth opportunities within these markets.

     Because we do not development land, our continued success is contingent upon our ability to control an adequate supply of finished lots on which to build, and on our developers’ ability to timely deliver finished lots to meet the sales demands of our customers. We acquire finished building lots at market prices from various land developers under purchase agreements. These purchase agreements require deposits, typically ranging up to 10% of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots, in the form of cash or letters of credit that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the purchase agreement. However, we believe that this lot acquisition strategy avoids the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and development. As of December 31, 2008, we controlled approximately 45,000 lots with deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately $178,000 and $5,000, respectively. Included in the number of controlled lots are approximately 17,000 lots for which we have recorded a contract land deposit impairment reserve of approximately $147,900 as of December 31, 2008. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for additional information regarding contract land deposits.

Overview of Current Business Environment

     The homebuilding environment in 2008 was characterized by high levels of existing and new homes available for sale, driven by slowed demand and record foreclosure rates. By the end of 2008, industry wide new home construction, as reported by the Commerce Department, had fallen to historically low levels. Homebuyer confidence continues to be negatively impacted by concerns regarding the current economic recession, higher levels of unemployment and a continuing decline in home values in each of the markets we serve. The sales of new and existing homes also continue to be adversely impacted by a more restrictive mortgage lending environment that has made it more difficult for our customers to obtain mortgage financing, as well as making it difficult to sell their current homes. Affordability also remains an issue despite falling home prices because of required higher downpayments to secure financing. Our markets have also been negatively impacted by homebuilders reducing prices in an effort to reduce new home inventories and competition from foreclosed properties. The combined effect of these market conditions has exerted substantial downward pressure on both new orders and selling prices.

     As a result of these deteriorating market conditions, new orders for 2008 were down 29% from the prior year and we experienced a continuation of the higher cancellation rates we experienced in 2007. Cancellation rates in 2008 were 23% as compared to 21% in 2007. In response, we increased incentives to homebuyers and reduced prices in many of our markets. These pricing pressures led to a 12% decrease in the average selling price for new orders in 2008 as compared to 2007. New orders and the average selling prices were down in each of our market segments, with the largest decline in new orders being experienced in our South East market segment which saw a decline in new orders of 45% year over year.

     Throughout 2008, we have continued to work with our developers to reduce lot prices to current market values and/or to defer scheduled lot purchases to coincide with our slower than expected sales pace. In communities where we are unsuccessful in negotiating necessary adjustments to the purchase agreements to meet current market prices, we may exit the community and forfeit our deposit under the applicable purchase agreement. In addition, we may also forfeit our deposit in a community we are not exiting in order to restructure a purchase agreement to current market prices. During 2008, we incurred contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $165,000 from actual or expected terminations, or from restructured purchase agreements where we forfeited, or determined we would forfeit, the deposit. In 2007, contract land deposit impairment charges totaled approximately $261,800. As noted above, as of December 31, 2008 we had a reserve of approximately $148,000 on outstanding contract land deposits related to approximately 17,000 lots. These lots are included in the total number of lots controlled mentioned above. The total number of lots controlled at December 31, 2008 is down 33% from approximately 67,600 lots at December 31, 2007 due to the termination of certain purchase agreements and a reduced pace of entering into new lot purchase agreements to coincide with our slower than expected sales pace.

     Consolidated revenues for 2008 decreased 28% to $3,693,039 from $5,129,342 in 2007. Net income for 2008 was $100,892, $17.04 per diluted share, compared to net income of $333,955, $54.14 per diluted share in 2007, a 70% decrease in net income and a 69% decrease in diluted earnings per share. Gross profit margins within our homebuilding business decreased to 12.6% in 2008 from 16.3% in 2007. Gross profit margins have been negatively impacted by the aforementioned lower selling prices and increased incentives and continue to trend lower. Additionally, gross profit margins were negatively impacted by the contract land deposit impairment charges in both 2008 and 2007 as discussed above.

     We expect to continue to experience downward pressure on sales and selling prices over at least the next several quarters in all of our market segments due to current market conditions and uncertainties surrounding the effectiveness of the Government’s stimulus package to slow the decline in home values, reduce foreclosure rates and boost consumer confidence. We in turn expect these sales and pricing pressures to continue to negatively impact gross profit margins in future periods. To offset these declining selling prices and customer affordability issues, we continue to aggressively work with our vendors to reduce material and labor costs incurred in the construction process, alter product offerings when appropriate and focus on reducing lot costs as discussed above. In addition, we continue to take aggressive action to lower overhead costs. Relative to our peak levels in 2006, we have reduced headcount by 53% and the number of homebuilding divisions we operate by 39%. We will continue to assess and adjust our staffing levels and organizational structure as conditions warrant.

Homebuilding Operations

     The following table summarizes the results of our consolidated homebuilding operations and certain operating activity for each of the last three years:

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008				2007				2006
Revenues		$	3,638,702			$	5,048,187			$	6,036,236
Cost of sales		$	3,181,010			$	4,227,059			$	4,701,265
Gross profit margin percentage			12.6	%			16.3	%			22.1	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		$	308,739			$	343,520			$	432,319
Settlements (units)			10,741				13,513				15,139
Average settlement price		$	338.4			$	373.2			$	398.2
New orders (units)			8,760				12,270				13,217
Average new order price		$	311.3			$	352.0			$	377.4
Backlog (units)			3,164				5,145				6,388
Average backlog price		$	316.9			$	371.3			$	412.4

Consolidated Homebuilding Revenues

     Homebuilding revenues for 2008 decreased 28% from 2007, primarily as a result of a 21% decrease in the number of homes settled and a 9% decrease in the average settlement price. The decrease in the number of units settled is primarily attributable to our beginning backlog units being approximately 19% lower entering 2008 as compared to the beginning backlog units entering 2007 and lower new orders year over year. Average settlement prices were impacted primarily by a 10% lower average price of homes in the beginning backlog entering 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007 and also by lower average sales prices for new orders in 2008 as compared to 2007.

     Homebuilding revenues for 2007 decreased 16% from 2006, primarily as a result of an 11% decrease in the number of homes settled and a 6% decrease in the average settlement price. These decreases were driven primarily by a 23% lower number of units in backlog and a 7% lower average price of units in backlog at the beginning of 2007 as compared to the beginning of 2006.

Consolidated Homebuilding New Orders

     New orders and the average sales price of new orders decreased 29% and 12%, respectively in 2008 as compared to 2007. Both the number of new orders and the average selling prices have been negatively impacted by the aforementioned challenging market conditions. New orders were also negatively impacted by a 16% decrease in the average number of active communities year over year to 427 in 2008 from 505 in 2007 and a reduction in traffic per community, year over year. As noted above, we expect to continue to experience downward pressure on sales and selling prices over at least the next several quarters in all of our market segments due to current market conditions.

     The number of new orders for 2007 and the average selling price of new orders each decreased 7% when compared to 2006. The challenging market conditions, which began to deteriorate in the second half of 2005, led to an increase in cancellation rates year over year to 21% in 2007 from 19% in 2006 and in turn negatively impacted new orders in 2007. Additionally, we noted a significant increase in the cancellation rates in the fourth quarter of 2007 to 32% from 20% in the fourth quarter of 2006. These increases in cancellation rates were driven by continued tightening of mortgage underwriting standards and financing availability which impacted not only our customers’ ability to secure financing for their new home purchase but also has impacted our customers’ ability to sell their existing homes leading to contract cancellations. Sales were also negatively impacted by a 14% reduction in the average number of active communities in 2007, down to 505 from 589 in 2006. The decrease in the average number of active communities was a result of the termination of certain purchase agreements and a reduced pace of entering into new lot option contracts due to uncertainties within the homebuilding market and its impact on the market value of land.

Consolidated Homebuilding Gross Profit

     Gross profit margins in 2008 declined to 12.6% compared to 16.3% in 2007 despite lower contract land deposit impairment charges in 2008 of approximately $165,000, or 454 basis points, compared to approximately $261,800, or 519 basis points in 2007. The decline in gross profit margins was primarily driven by continued pressure on selling prices as a result of the aforementioned challenging market conditions. As discussed above, we expect these challenging market conditions to continue for at least the next several quarters, exerting downward pressure on new orders, selling prices and in turn, also on our gross profit margins.

     Gross profit margins declined to 16.3% in 2007 from 22.1% in 2006. Gross profit margins were negatively impacted in 2007 by lower selling prices created by the aforementioned difficult market conditions. Additionally, gross profit margins were negatively impacted by the contract land deposit impairment charges in 2007 of $261,800, or 519 basis points, as compared to $173,800 in 2006, or 288 basis points.

Consolidated Homebuilding Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)

     SG&A expenses in 2008 decreased approximately $34,800, or 10%, from 2007, but increased as a percentage of revenue to 8.5% in 2008 from 6.8% in 2007. The decrease in SG&A expenses is attributable to a decrease in selling and marketing costs of approximately $31,000 related to the previously mentioned 16% reduction in the average number of active communities in 2008 compared to 2007. In addition, personnel costs decreased approximately $20,000 as a result of lower staffing levels and lower management incentive costs year over year. These declines were offset partially by an increase of approximately $24,600 in stock-based compensation expense in 2008 compared to 2007. This increase is attributable to the reversal of approximately $28,450 in SG&A classified stock-based compensation costs in the third quarter of 2007 related to approximately 400,000 outstanding stock options which were subject to a performance metric which we determined in 2007 would not be achieved. See note 9 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the performance based stock option grants.

     SG&A expenses in 2007 decreased approximately $88,800, or 21%, from 2006 and as a percentage of revenue, decreased to 6.8% in 2007 from 7.2% in 2006. The decrease in SG&A expenses is partially attributable to an approximate $36,300 decrease in personnel costs. This decrease resulted from a reduction in staffing levels to meet current and expected levels of sales activity and lower incentive compensation costs of approximately $9,200 year over year. In addition, SG&A costs were favorably impacted by a reduction of approximately $39,800 in stock-based compensation costs in 2007 as compared to 2006. As discussed above, during 2007 we determined that is was improbable that we would achieve the performance metric related to approximately 400,000 outstanding stock options. This determination resulted in the reversal of approximately $28,450 in SG&A related stock-based compensation. In addition, because it was expected that none of the outstanding stock options that were subject to the performance metric would vest, we did not record any additional compensation costs related to these options in the fourth quarter of 2007. SG&A costs were also favorably impacted by a reduction in marketing costs of approximately $10,000 in 2007 from 2006 due to the aforementioned 14% reduction in the average number of active communities in the current year.

Consolidated Homebuilding Backlog

     Backlog units and dollars were 3,164 and $1,002,795, respectively, as of December 31, 2008 compared to 5,145 and $1,910,504 as of December 31, 2007. The 39% decrease in backlog units is attributable to our beginning backlog units being approximately 19% lower entering 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. In addition, backlog units have been negatively impacted by the aforementioned 29% decline in new orders year over year. Backlog dollars were negatively impacted by the decrease in backlog units coupled with a 15% decrease in the average price of homes in ending backlog, resulting primarily from an 8% decrease in the average selling price for new orders over the six-month period ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.

     The net new order and settlement activity for 2007 resulted in a decrease in backlog units and dollars to 5,145 and $1,910,504, respectively, at December 31, 2007 compared to 6,388 units and $2,634,720, respectively, at December 31, 2006. The 27% decrease in backlog dollars was attributable to the 19% decrease in backlog units and an 11% decrease in the average price of new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006.

Consolidated Homebuilding — Other Charges

     We reassessed our goodwill and intangible asset balances for impairment in the fourth quarter of 2008, as a result of the continuing declines in new orders and backlog as discussed above and the continuing deterioration of the homebuilding environment in each of our markets spurred further in 2008 by the credit crisis in the latter part of 2008. As a result of this assessment, it was determined that the goodwill and intangible assets related to our Rymarc Homes and Fox Ridge Homes operations were fully impaired and we wrote-off a total of $11,686 related to such assets in 2008.

Reportable Homebuilding Segments

     Homebuilding profit before tax includes all revenues and income generated from the sale of homes, less the cost of homes sold, SG&A expenses, and a corporate capital allocation charge determined at the corporate headquarters. The corporate capital allocation charge eliminates in consolidation, is based on the segment’s average net assets employed, and is charged using a consistent methodology in the years presented. The corporate capital allocation charged to the operating segment allows the Chief Operating Decision Maker (as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”) to determine whether the operating segment’s results are providing the desired rate of return after covering our cost of capital. We record charges on contract land deposits when we determine that it is probable that recovery of the deposit is impaired. For segment reporting purposes, impairments on contract land deposits are generally charged to the operating segment upon the determination to terminate a lot purchase agreement with the developer, or to restructure a purchase agreement resulting in the forfeiture of the deposit. The following tables summarize certain homebuilding operating activity by reportable segment for each of the last three years:

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008				2007				2006
Mid Atlantic:
Revenues		$	2,161,764			$	3,099,053			$	3,825,960
Settlements (units)			5,240				6,634				7,491
Average settlement price		$	412.5			$	467.0			$	510.4
New Orders (units)			4,290				5,695				6,182
Average new order price		$	373.4			$	436.5			$	479.6
Backlog (units)			1,776				2,726				3,665
Average backlog price		$	371.3			$	447.2			$	499.7
Gross profit margin		$	294,708			$	547,757			$	979,362
Gross profit margin percentage			13.63	%			17.67	%			25.60	%
Segment profit		$	108,561			$	296,049			$	687,904
North East:
Revenues		$	347,142			$	433,631			$	657,338
Settlements (units)			1,086				1,247				1,682
Average settlement price		$	319.7			$	347.7			$	390.7
New Orders (units)			884				1,212				1,438
Average new order price		$	298.5			$	338.7			$	371.4
Backlog (units)			303				505				540
Average backlog price		$	288.8			$	338.8			$	359.6
Gross profit margin		$	46,608			$	57,860			$	120,531
Gross profit margin percentage			13.43	%			13.34	%			18.34	%
Segment profit		$	14,761			$	12,618			$	64,246
Mid East:
Revenues		$	659,649			$	860,139			$	965,626
Settlements (units)			2,762				3,321				3,571
Average settlement price		$	237.4			$	257.7			$	268.8
New Orders (units)			2,380				3,160				3,244
Average new order price		$	229.5			$	248.2			$	267.7
Backlog (units)			731				1,113				1,274
Average backlog price		$	223.9			$	245.4			$	270.6
Gross profit margin		$	104,762			$	155,738			$	160,494
Gross profit margin percentage			15.88	%			18.11	%			16.62	%
Segment profit		$	42,296			$	80,969			$	69,911
South East:
Revenues		$	470,147			$	655,364			$	587,312
Settlements (units)			1,653				2,311				2,395
Average settlement price		$	284.4			$	283.6			$	245.2
New Orders (units)			1,206				2,203				2,353
Average new order price		$	261.2			$	290.0			$	263.9
Backlog (units)			354				801				909
Average backlog price		$	260.5			$	308.6			$	290.7
Gross profit margin		$	60,173			$	144,254			$	129,127
Gross profit margin percentage			12.80	%			22.01	%			21.99	%
Segment profit		$	9,286			$	89,785			$	79,948

Mid Atlantic

2008 versus 2007

     The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $187,500, or 63%, decrease in segment profit in 2008 compared to 2007. Revenues for the Mid Atlantic segment, which represent approximately 59% of total homebuilding revenues for the year, decreased approximately $937,300, or 30%, for the year from the prior year period. This decrease is attributable to a 21% decrease in the number of units settled and a 12% decrease in the average settlement price. The decrease in units settled is attributable to a 26% lower backlog unit balance at the beginning of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 and to a 25% decline in new orders year over year. The decrease in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to an 11% lower average price of homes in the beginning backlog period over period and was also impacted by lower average selling prices of new orders in 2008 compared to 2007. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage fell to 13.6% in 2008 from 17.7% in 2007. Gross profit margins were adversely affected by the downward pressure on selling prices which resulted in the aforementioned 12% decrease in the average settlement price. Gross profit margins were also negatively impacted in each respective period by contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $81,800, or 379 basis points, in 2008 compared to approximately $153,600, or 496 basis points, in 2007.

     New orders in the Mid Atlantic segment for 2008 decreased 25% from 2007 and the segment’s average new order sales price decreased 15% year over year. New orders and the average selling price for new orders were down in each of our markets within the Mid Atlantic segment and have been negatively impacted by market conditions which remain challenging, as discussed in the Overview above. In addition, new orders were negatively impacted by a 15% decrease in the average number of active communities to 204 in 2008 from 242 in 2007 within the segment. Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 35% and 46%, respectively, year over year. The decrease in backlog units is attributable to the beginning backlog units being approximately 26% lower entering 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. In addition, backlog units have been negatively impacted by the aforementioned decline in new orders in 2008 compared to 2007. Backlog dollars were negatively impacted by the decrease in backlog units and a 17% decrease in the average price of homes in ending backlog.

2007 versus 2006

     The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $391,900, or 57%, decrease in segment profit year over year. Revenues decreased 19% as a result of an 11% decrease in the number of units settled and a 9% decrease in the average settlement price. The decrease in units settled is attributable to a 26% lower backlog unit balance at the beginning of the 2007 as compared to the beginning of 2006, offset partially by a higher backlog turnover rate year over year. The decrease in the average settlement price is attributable to an 8% lower average price of homes in beginning backlog year over year. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage declined in 2007 to 17.7% from 25.6% in 2006, negatively impacted by the 9% decrease in average settlement prices and current market conditions which resulted in the write-off of approximately $153,600 in contract land deposits in 2007 as compared to approximately $126,400 in impairment charges in 2006.

     Segment new orders were down 8% in 2007 from 2006 and the average selling price declined by 9%. New orders in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD sub-markets declined 12% and 6%, respectively. These declines were primarily the result of a competitive selling environment driven by a market which continued to deteriorate throughout 2007. As discussed above in the Overview section, the mortgage market turmoil in 2007 impacted the availability of jumbo mortgage products which represented approximately 39% of all mortgages closed in the Washington, D.C. sub-market within this segment. These market conditions put significant downward pressure on selling prices and contributed to higher levels of cancellations within these markets. Cancellation rates for the Mid Atlantic segment increased to 25% in 2007 from 23% in 2006, with the highest cancellation rates occurring in the Washington, D.C. sub-market where the cancellation rates increased to 31% in 2007 from 29% in 2006. Additionally, cancellation rates in the Washington, D.C. sub-market increased in the fourth quarter of 2007 to 46% as compared to 34% in the fourth quarter of 2006. The net new order and settlement activity for 2007 resulted in a 26% decrease in backlog units at December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006. Backlog dollars decreased 33% year over year due to the decrease in backlog units and additionally, to a 12% decrease in the average selling price for new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006.

North East

2008 versus 2007

     The North East segment had an approximate $2,100 increase in segment profit in 2008 compared to 2007, despite a decrease in revenues of approximately $86,500, or 20%, year over year. Revenues declined due to a 13% decrease in the number of units settled and an 8% decrease in the average settlement price year over year. The decrease in the number of units settled and the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a 7% lower beginning backlog balance and 6% lower average price of homes in beginning backlog entering 2008 as compared to 2007. In addition, the number of units settled has been negatively impacted by a decline in new orders year over year. Gross profit margins in the North East segment in 2008 remained relatively flat with the prior year at 13.4% compared to 13.3% in 2007. Contract land deposit impairment charges for the segment decreased to approximately $11,200, or 322 basis points, in 2008 compared to approximately $13,600, or 313 basis points, in 2007. The increase in segment profit is primarily attributable to the decrease in contract land deposit impairment charges, cost control measures and reduced sales and marketing costs due to a 22% reduction in the average number of active communities during 2008 compared to 2007.

     Segment new orders and the average new order sales price for 2008 decreased 27% and 12%, respectively, from 2007 as a result of market conditions which remain challenging, as discussed in the Overview above. In addition, new orders were negatively impacted by the aforementioned decrease in the average number of active communities within the North East segment. Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 40% and 49%, respectively, year over year. The decrease in backlog units is attributable to the aforementioned decline in new orders in 2008 compared to 2007, in addition to a 7% lower beginning backlog unit balance entering 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease in backlog dollars is due to the decrease in backlog units and to a 12% decrease in the average selling price for new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.

2007 versus 2006

     The North East segment had an approximate $51,600, or 80%, decrease in segment profit year over year. Revenues for the same period decreased 34%, or approximately $223,700, primarily as a result of a 26% decrease in the number of units settled and an 11% decrease in the average settlement price. The decrease in units settled is attributable to a 31% lower backlog unit balance at the beginning of the 2007 as compared to the beginning of 2006. The decrease in the average settlement price is attributable to an 11% lower average price of homes in beginning backlog year over year. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage decreased to 13.3% in 2007 from 18.3% in 2006. Segment gross profit margins were negatively impacted by the lower average settlement prices year over year and by contract land deposit write-offs totaling approximately $13,600 in 2007 as compared to approximately $10,000 in 2006.

     Segment new orders were down 16% year over year and the average selling price for new orders decreased 9%, as a result of pricing pressures in a difficult selling environment. New orders have also been negatively impacted by an increase in the cancellation rate in the segment to 19% in 2007 from 13% in 2006. The net new order and settlement activity for 2007 resulted in a 7% decrease in backlog units at December 31, 2007 as compared to December 31, 2006. Backlog dollars decreased 12% year over year due to the decrease in backlog units and to a 10% decrease in the average selling price for new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006.

Mid East

2008 versus 2007

     The Mid East segment had an approximate $38,700, or 48%, decrease in segment profit in 2008 compared to 2007. Revenues decreased approximately $200,500, or 23%, for 2008 from 2007 due to a 17% decrease in the number of units settled and an 8% decrease in the average settlement price period over period. The decrease in the number of units settled and the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a 13% lower beginning backlog balance and 9% lower average price of homes in beginning backlog period over period. In addition, the number of units settled has been negatively impacted by a decline in new orders year over year. Gross profit margins decreased to 15.9% in 2008 from 18.1% in 2007. Contract land deposit impairment charges in the segment were approximately $10,400, or 158 basis points, in 2008 compared to $10,800, or 126 basis points, in 2007. The decline in gross profit margins was primarily driven by continued pressure on selling prices as a result of the aforementioned challenging market conditions which resulted in an 8% decrease in the average settlement price year over year.

     Segment new orders and the average new order sales price for 2008, decreased 25% and 8%, respectively, from 2007. New orders were negatively impacted by market conditions which remain challenging, as discussed in the Overview above. In addition, new orders were negatively impacted by a 16% decrease in the average number of active communities within the Mid East segment year over year and by an increase in the cancellation rate in the segment to 18% in 2008 from 15% in 2007. Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 34% and 40%, respectively, year over year. The decrease in backlog units is attributable to the beginning backlog units being approximately 13% lower entering 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. In addition, backlog units have been negatively impacted by the aforementioned decline in new orders in 2008 compared to 2007. The decrease in backlog dollars is attributable to the decrease in backlog units and to a 9% decrease in the average selling price for new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.

2007 versus 2006

     The Mid East segment had an approximate $11,100, or 16%, increase in segment profit in 2007, despite a decrease in revenues for the segment of 11%, or approximately $105,500 from 2006. The decrease in revenues is attributable to a 7% decrease in units settled year over year and a 4% decrease in the average settlement price. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage increased to 18.1% in 2007 from 16.6% in 2006. The increase in gross profit margins year over year is attributable to an approximate $8,000 favorable variance in operating costs within the segment due primarily to lower personnel costs. Gross profit margins were negatively impacted in each year by the write-off of contract land deposits of approximately $10,800 and $10,000 in 2007 and 2006, respectively. Segment profit was also favorably impacted by an approximate $7,000 decrease in marketing costs due to a 22% reduction in the average number of active communities within the segment in 2007 as compared to 2006.

     Segment new orders were down 3% year over year and the average selling price for new orders decreased 7%. New orders were negatively impacted by the aforementioned decrease in the number of active communities and by deteriorating market conditions throughout 2007, which led to declining new orders in each successive quarter in 2007. The net new order and settlement activity resulted in a 13% decrease in backlog units at December 31, 2007 as compared to December 31, 2006. Backlog dollars were down 21% year over year due to the decrease in backlog units, coupled with a 9% decrease in the average price on new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006.

South East

2008 versus 2007

     The South East segment had an approximate $80,500, or 90%, decrease in segment profit in 2008 compared to 2007. Revenues decreased approximately $185,200, or 28%, in 2008 from 2007 due to a 29% decrease in the number of units settled period over period. The decrease in units settled is attributable to a 12% lower beginning backlog unit balance entering 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, and to a decline in new orders year over year. Gross profit margins decreased to 12.8% in 2008 from 22.0% in 2007. Gross profit margins were negatively impacted in 2008 by increased contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $20,100, or 427 basis points, in 2008 compared to approximately $4,800, or 73 basis points, in 2007. Gross profit margins were also negatively impacted by the use of increased sales incentives, and by higher average lot and operating costs per settled unit.

     Segment new orders and the average new order sales price decreased 45% and 10%, respectively, during 2008 compared to 2007. Market conditions within the South East segment continued to deteriorate throughout 2008. These worsening market conditions have resulted in lower sales absorption rates within our active communities and higher cancellation rates year over year. New orders were negatively impacted by a 10% decrease in the average number of active communities to 65 in 2008 from 73 in 2007 within the segment. Cancellation rates in the overall segment increased to 29% in 2008 from 20% in 2007. The 45% decrease in new orders for 2008, coupled with a 12% lower beginning backlog balance entering 2008 compared to 2007, resulted in a 56% decrease in backlog units as of December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007. The decrease in backlog units coupled with a decline of 16% in the average backlog price, has resulted in a 63% decline in backlog dollars year over year.

2007 versus 2006

     The South East segment had an approximate $9,800, or 12% increase in segment profit from 2006. Revenues for the segment increased approximately $68,100, or 12%, as a result of a 16% increase in the average settlement price, offset partially by a 4% decrease in the number of units settled. The increase in the average settlement price is attributable to a 20% higher average price of homes in beginning backlog for 2007 as compared to 2006. The higher value of homes in beginning backlog was attributable to favorable market conditions in the prior year which allowed us to increase sales prices, as well as a general shift in sales within the segment to a larger, higher priced product. The number of settlements is down primarily due to the 2007 beginning backlog being 4% lower than backlog at the beginning of 2006. Gross profit margin percentage for the segment in 2007 remained flat with 2006 at 22.0%.

     Segment new orders were down 6% year over year, while the average new order price for 2007 increased 10% from 2006. Although the South East segment was not as severely impacted by the adverse economic conditions experienced in our other reporting segments during the first half of 2007, continued tightening in the credit markets and declining consumer confidence contributed to increased downward pressure on selling prices and higher levels of cancellations within this segment. New orders were negatively impacted by a 37% decline in new orders in the fourth quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006, as market conditions grew more challenging within the South East segment. The cancellation rate in the fourth quarter of 2007 increased to 36% compared to 18% in the same period in 2006. In addition, the average selling price of new orders in the fourth quarter of 2007 was down 2% from the same period in 2006. The net new order and settlement activity for 2007 resulted in a 12% decrease in backlog units at December 31, 2007 as compared to December 31, 2006. Backlog dollars were down 6% at December 31, 2007 as compared the December 31, 2006 due to the lower backlog unit balance, offset partially by a 4% increase in the average sales price of new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006.

Homebuilding Segment Reconciliations to Consolidated Homebuilding Operations

     In addition to the corporate capital allocation and contract land deposit impairments discussed above, the other reconciling items between homebuilding segment profit and homebuilding consolidated profit before tax include unallocated corporate overhead (which includes all management incentive compensation), stock option compensation expense, goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges, consolidation adjustments and external corporate interest expense. Our overhead functions, such as accounting, treasury, human resources, land acquisition, etc., are centrally performed and the costs are not allocated to our operating segments. Consolidation adjustments consist of such items to convert the reportable segments’ results, which are predominantly maintained on a cash basis, to a full accrual basis for external financial statement presentation purposes, and are not allocated to our operating segments. Likewise, stock option compensation expense and goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges are not charged to the operating segments. External corporate interest expense is primarily comprised of interest charges on our outstanding senior notes and working capital line borrowings, and are not charged to the operating segments because the charges are included in the corporate capital allocation discussed above.

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008				2007				2006
Homebuilding Consolidated Gross Profit:
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic		$	294,708			$	547,757			$	979,362
Homebuilding North East			46,608				57,860				120,531
Homebuilding Mid East			104,762				155,738				160,494
Homebuilding South East			60,173				144,254				129,127
Consolidation adjustments and other (1)			(48,559	)			(84,481	)			(54,543	)
Consolidated homebuilding gross profit		$	457,692			$	821,128			$	1,334,971
Homebuilding Consolidated Profit Before Tax:
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic		$	108,561			$	296,049			$	687,904
Homebuilding North East			14,761				12,618				64,246
Homebuilding Mid East			42,296				80,969				69,911
Homebuilding South East			9,286				89,785				79,948
Reconciling items:
Contract land deposit impairments (2)			(41,134	)			(79,002	)			(27,717	)
Stock option expense (3)			(38,681	)			(13,542	)			(54,514	)
Corporate capital allocation (4)			108,509				152,363				184,908
Unallocated corporate overhead (5)			(63,181	)			(69,975	)			(86,363	)
Consolidation adjustments and other (6)			24,437				28,842				(3,340	)
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets (7)			(11,686	)			—				—
Corporate interest expense			(12,417	)			(12,531	)			(17,145	)
Reconciling items sub-total			(34,153	)			6,155				(4,171	)
Homebuilding consolidated profit before taxes		$	140,751			$	485,576			$	897,838

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008				2007				2006
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic		$	73,042			$	106,032			$	131,823
Homebuilding North East			10,081				14,669				19,533
Homebuilding Mid East			12,902				17,381				21,235
Homebuilding South East			12,484				14,281				12,317
Total		$	108,509			$	152,363			$	184,908

Mortgage Banking Segment

     We conduct our mortgage banking activity through NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (“NVRM”), a wholly owned subsidiary. NVRM focuses almost exclusively on serving the homebuilding segment’s customer base. Following is a table of financial and statistical data for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:

		2008				2007				2006
Loan closing volume:
Total principal		$	2,351,341			$	3,225,324			$	3,918,206
Loan volume mix:
Adjustable rate mortgages			5	%			17	%			37	%
Fixed-rate mortgages			95	%			83	%			63	%
Operating Profit:
Segment Profit		$	29,227			$	54,576			$	68,753
Stock option expense			(2,523	)			(647	)			(3,620	)
Mortgage banking income before tax		$	26,704			$	53,929			$	65,133
Capture rate:			85	%			85	%			86	%
Mortgage Banking Fees:
Net gain on sale of loans		$	38,921			$	60,128			$	72,700
Title services			14,581				20,304				24,081
Servicing fees			835				723				1,107
		$	54,337			$	81,155			$	97,888

2008 versus 2007

     Loan closing volume for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased 27% from 2007. The 2008 decrease was primarily attributable to a 19% decrease in the number of units closed and a 10% decrease in the average loan amount year over year. These decreases are attributable to the aforementioned decrease in the homebuilding segment’s number of units settled and average settlement prices in 2008 as compared to 2007.

     Segment profit for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased approximately $25,300 from 2007. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in mortgage banking fees attributable to the aforementioned decrease in closed loan volume and a reduction in fees charged to customers to assist our selling efforts in the homebuilding segment. The decrease to mortgage banking fees was partially offset by 31 basis point increase in fees received for servicing released premiums as a result of the product mix shift towards fixed rate mortgages, partly driven by an increase in the use of FHA fixed rate loan products, which generally carry a higher servicing released premium than other non-FHA loan products.

     The decrease to mortgage banking fees for the year ended December 31, 2008 was also partially offset by an approximate $900 increase in unrealized income from the fair value measurement of our locked loan commitments, forward mortgage-backed securities sales, and closed loans held for sale, which is included in mortgage banking fees. The fair value measurement was the result of the adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, “Written Loan commitments recorded at Fair Value through Earnings” (“SAB No. 109”) and FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement”, both of which the Company adopted on a prospective basis as of January 1, 2008. As a result of the adoption of SAB No. 109 and SFAS No. 157, the fair value measurement for locked loan commitments and closed loans held for sale now includes the assumed gain/loss on the expected resultant loan sale and the value of the servicing rights associated with the loan. This is in addition to the prior fair value measurement, which only considered the effects of interest rate movements between the date of the rate lock and either the loan closing date or the balance sheet date. Each of the aforementioned fair value calculations are classified as Level 2 observable inputs as defined in SFAS No. 157. The fair value measurement will be impacted in the future by the change in volume and product mix of our locked loan commitments.

     Stock option expense increased by approximately $1,900 for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to 2007. As noted below, this was due to a 2007 reversal of approximately $2,150 of pre-tax stock based compensation costs (see details below). There were no additional adjustments in 2008.

2007 versus 2006

     Loan closing volume for the year ended December 31, 2007 decreased 18% from 2006. The 2007 decrease was primarily attributable to a 13% decrease in the number of units closed and a 5% decrease in the average loan amount year over year. These decreases are attributable to the aforementioned decrease in the homebuilding segment’s number of units settled and average settlement prices in 2007 as compared to 2006. The number of units closed was also adversely impacted by a 1% decrease in NVR’s capture rate in 2007.

     Segment profit for the year ended December 31, 2007 decreased approximately $14,200 from 2006. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in mortgage banking fees attributable to the aforementioned decrease in closed loan volume and a reduction in fees charged to customers to assist our selling efforts in the homebuilding segment. The decrease to mortgage banking fees was partially offset by an approximate $5,400 decrease in costs during 2007 related to the contractual repayment of loan sale income to investors for loans that were paid in full within a set number of days following the sale of the loan and an increase in the percentage of fixed rate loans in the product mix. Traditionally, fixed rate mortgages have been more profitable than adjustable rate mortgages. In the second half of 2006, with the change in interest rates, the rate differential between fixed rate and adjustable rate mortgages narrowed. As a result, we saw a shift to these more profitable products, which remained favorable throughout 2007.

     As noted above, due to the continued earnings decline resulting from the deterioration in market conditions and our expectation that market conditions would not improve in the near term, the 2007 year-to-date NVRM results were impacted by the determination that it was improbable that we would achieve the performance metric related to certain outstanding stock options. This determination resulted in the reversal of approximately $2,150 of pre-tax stock-based compensation costs recognized in prior periods.

Mortgage Banking — Other

     NVRM is dependent on our homebuilding segment’s customers for business. As sales and selling prices of the homebuilding segment decline, NVRM’s operations are likewise adversely affected. In many cases, NVRM is reducing the fees charged to its borrowers in an effort to assist our selling efforts, and is likely to continue doing so in the foreseeable future, which will adversely impact the mortgage segment’s future results. In addition, NVRM’s operating results may be adversely affected in future periods due to the continued tightening and volatility of the credit markets.

     In November 2008, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) published a final rule amending its Real Estate Settlement and Protection Act (“RESPA”) regulations. The rule, among other things, revised the definition of “required use,” the result of which is the prohibition of homebuilding companies with affiliated mortgage companies from offering discounts to their customers if those customers use the affiliated mortgage company. This provision of the rule was originally scheduled to be effective January 16, 2009. However, in January 2009, HUD issued a final rule delaying the effective date until April 16, 2009 due to litigation surrounding the revised definition of “required use.” If the revised definition of “required use” is adopted by HUD as currently proposed, it could have a material impact on NVRM’s operations, including its financial results and its capture rate.

Seasonality

     Overall, we do not experience material seasonal fluctuations in sales, settlements or loan closings.

Effective Tax Rate

     Our consolidated effective tax rate in 2008, 2007 and 2006 was 39.75%, 38.1% and 39.0%, respectively. The higher effective tax rate in 2008 is primarily due to the reduction in tax exempt interest income and lower pre-tax income in 2008 as compared to 2007. In February 2009, Dwight C. Schar relinquished his Executive Officer role with the Company. As a result, a tax benefit will be generated in 2009 related to compensation expense recorded for certain outstanding option grants held by Mr. Schar that was previously considered to be a permanent non-deductible tax difference. This is expected to result in a decrease in the 2009 effective tax rate.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Pending Adoption

     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement, but deducted to arrive at income available to common shareholders. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its non controlling interests. SFAS No. 160 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) expands on the guidance of SFAS No. 141, extending its applicability to all transactions and other events in which an entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. It broadens the fair value measurement and recognition of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and interests transferred as a result of business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) expands on required disclosures to improve the statement users’ abilities to evaluate the nature and financial effects of business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for any acquisitions made on or after January 1, 2009.

     In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2 (“FSP No. 157-2”), “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of FSP No. 157-2 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

     In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. SFAS No. 161 enhances the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, regarding an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. We will conform our disclosures to the requirements of SFAS No. 161 upon adoption.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Lines of Credit and Notes Payable

     Our homebuilding segment generally provides for its working capital cash requirements using cash generated from operations, a short-term unsecured working capital revolving credit facility (the “Facility”) and the public debt and equity markets. The Facility provides for borrowings of up to $600,000, subject to certain borrowing base limitations. The Facility expires in December 2010 and outstanding amounts bear interest at either (i) the prime rate or (ii) London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus applicable margin as defined within the Facility.

Up to $150,000 of the Facility is currently available for issuance in the form of letters of credit, of which $13,421 was outstanding at December 31, 2008. The Facility contains various affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants include among others, certain limitations on transactions involving the creation of guarantees, sale of assets, acquisitions, mergers, investments and land purchases. Additional covenants include (i) a minimum adjusted consolidated tangible net worth requirement, (ii) a maximum leverage ratio requirement, and (iii) an interest coverage ratio requirement. These covenants restrict the amount that we would be able to pay in dividends each year. We are also subject to borrowing base restrictions if our senior debt rating falls below investment grade. At December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Facility and we have maintained our investment grade rating on our senior debt. Additionally, at December 31, 2008, there were no borrowing base limitations reducing the amount available to us for borrowings and we had no direct borrowings outstanding under the Facility.

     NVR’s mortgage banking segment provides for its mortgage origination and other operating activities using cash generated from operations as well as a revolving mortgage repurchase facility. On August 5, 2008, NVRM entered into a Master Repurchase Agreement with U.S. Bank National Association, as Agent and representative of itself as a Buyer, and the other Buyers (the “Repurchase Agreement”). The Repurchase Agreement replaced NVRM’s warehouse credit facility which was set to expire on August 21, 2008. The Repurchase Agreement provides for loan purchases up to $110,000, subject to certain sub-limits. In addition, the Repurchase Agreement provides for an accordion feature under which NVRM may request that the aggregate commitments under the Repurchase Agreement be increased to an amount up to $150,000. The Repurchase Agreement is used to fund NVRM’s mortgage origination activities, under which $44,539 was outstanding at December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2008, the borrowing base limitation reduced the amount available to us for borrowing to approximately $67,000. The Repurchase Agreement expires on August 4, 2009. Advances under the Repurchase Agreement carry a Pricing Rate, based on the Libor Rate plus the Libor Margin, or at NVRM’s option, the Balance Funded Rate, as these terms are defined in the Repurchase Agreement. The weighted-average Pricing Rate for amounts outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement was 2.9% during 2008. The average Pricing Rate for amounts outstanding at December 31, 2008 was 1.9%. The Repurchase Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants include among others, certain limitations on transactions involving acquisitions, mergers, the incurrence of debt, sale of assets and creation of liens upon any of its Mortgage Notes. Additional covenants include (i) a tangible net worth requirement, (ii) a minimum liquidity requirement, all of which we were compliant with at December 31, 2008.

     On June 17, 2003, we completed an offering, at par, for $200,000 of 5% Senior Notes due 2010 (the “Notes”) under a shelf registration statement filed in 1998 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Notes mature on June 15, 2010 and bear interest at 5%, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15, commencing on December 15, 2003. The Notes are general unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness and indebtedness under our working capital credit facility. The Notes are senior in right of payment to any future subordinated indebtedness that we may incur. We may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at any time upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days notice at a redemption price equal to the greater of (a) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, or (b) the discounted present value of the remaining scheduled payments of the Notes to be redeemed, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest. The indenture governing the Notes contains certain covenants which, among other items, restricts our ability to (i) create, incur, assume or guarantee any secured debt, (ii) enter into sale and leaseback transactions, and (iii) merge with or into other companies or sell all or substantially all of our assets. At December 31, 2008 we were in compliance with all covenants under the Notes. On December 22, 2008, we repurchased $36,680 of the Notes on the open market at 99.25% of par, resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $251.

     On September 8, 2008, we filed a shelf registration statement (the “2008 Shelf Registration”) with the SEC to register for future offer and sale, an unlimited amount of debt securities, common shares, preferred shares, depositary shares representing preferred shares and warrants. We expect to use the proceeds received from future offerings issued under the 2008 Shelf Registration for general corporate purposes. This discussion of NVR’s shelf registration capacity does not constitute an offer of any securities for sale.

Equity Repurchases

     In addition to funding growth in our homebuilding and mortgage banking operations, we historically have used a substantial portion of our excess liquidity to repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock in open market and privately negotiated transactions. This ongoing repurchase activity is conducted pursuant to publicly announced Board authorizations, and is typically executed in accordance with the safe-harbor provisions of Rule 10(b)-18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, the Board resolutions authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock specifically prohibit us from purchasing shares from our officers, directors, Profit Sharing/401K Plan Trust or Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust. The repurchase program assists us in accomplishing our primary objective, creating increases in shareholder value. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during 2008.

Cash Flows

     For the year ended December 31, 2008, our operating activities provided cash of $462,361. Cash was provided primarily by homebuilding operations and a reduction in our homebuilding inventories of approximately $288,000 due to a reduction in the number of homes under construction at the end of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. Cash was also provided by an approximate $34,000 decrease in mortgage loans held for sale. Operating cash flow for the current year was reduced by a decrease in our customer deposits of approximately $66,000. The presentation of operating cash flows was also reduced by approximately $50,000, which is the amount of the excess tax benefit realized from the exercise of stock options during the period and credited directly to additional paid in capital. As required by SFAS 123R, which we adopted effective January 1, 2006, excess tax benefits credited directly to additional-paid-in capital resulting from stock-based compensation must be presented as an operating cash outflow and a financing cash inflow.

     Net cash used for investing activities was $5,498 for the year ended December 31, 2008, and was used primarily for property and equipment purchases.

     Net cash provided by financing activities was $26,571 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Financing cash flow was favorably impacted by approximately $52,000 of proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the realization of approximately $50,000 in excess income tax benefits from the exercise of stock options, which pursuant to SFAS 123R, must be reported as a financing cash inflow. We reduced net borrowings under the mortgage warehouse facility by approximately $39,000 and we repurchased approximately $36,700 of our 5% Senior Notes due 2010 at a cost of approximately $36,400.

     At December 31, 2008, the homebuilding segment had restricted cash of $4,539, which relates to customer deposits on certain home sales.

     We believe that cash generated from operations and borrowings available under our credit facilities will be sufficient to satisfy near and long term cash requirements for working capital and debt service in both our homebuilding and mortgage banking operations.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Lot Acquisition Strategy

     We do not engage in land development. Instead, we acquire finished building lots at market prices from various land developers under fixed price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage, typically ranging up to 10%, of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots.

     We believe that our lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and land development. We may, at our option, choose for any reason and at any time not to perform under these purchase agreements by delivering notice of our intent not to acquire the finished lots under contract. Our sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under these purchase agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidating damage provision contained within the purchase agreements. We do not have any financial guarantees or completion obligations and we do not guarantee lot purchases on a specific performance basis under these purchase agreements.

     At December 31, 2008, we controlled approximately 45,000 lots with an aggregate purchase price of approximately $4,100,000, by making or committing to make deposits of approximately $201,000 in the form of cash and letters of credit. Our entire risk of loss pertaining to the aggregate $4,100,000 contractual commitment resulting from our non-performance under the contracts is limited to the $183,000 deposit paid, plus the additional $18,000 deposits referred to below. Of the $201,000 deposit total, approximately $178,000 in cash and approximately $5,000 in letters of credit have been issued as of December 31, 2008 and subsequent to December 31, 2008, we will pay $18,000 in additional deposits assuming that contractual development milestones are met by the developers (see Contractual Obligations section below). As of December 31, 2008, we had recorded an impairment valuation allowance of approximately $148,000 related to the cash deposits currently outstanding. Please refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for a further discussion of the contract land deposits and Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of our lot acquisition strategy in relation to our accounting under FIN 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”.

Bonds and Letters of Credit

     We enter into bond or letter of credit arrangements with local municipalities, government agencies, or land developers to collateralize our obligations under various contracts. We had $30,403 of contingent obligations under such agreements as of December 31, 2008 (inclusive of the $5,000 of lot acquisition deposits in the form of letters of credit discussed above). We believe we will fulfill our obligations under the related contracts and do not anticipate any material losses under these bonds or letters of credit.

Mortgage Commitments and Forward Sales

     In the normal course of business, our mortgage banking segment enters into contractual commitments to extend credit to buyers of single-family homes with fixed expiration dates. The commitments become effective when the borrowers “lock-in” a specified interest rate within time frames established by NVR. All mortgagors are evaluated for credit worthiness prior to the extension of the commitment. Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the time of the “lock-in” of rates by the borrower and the sale date of the loan to a broker/dealer. To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, we enter into optional or mandatory delivery forward sale contracts to sell whole loans and mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers. The forward sale contracts lock in an interest rate and price for the sale of loans similar to the specific rate lock commitments. NVR does not engage in speculative or trading derivative activities. Both the rate lock commitments to borrowers and the forward sale contracts to broker/dealers are undesignated derivatives, and, accordingly, are marked to fair value through earnings. At December 31, 2008, there were contractual commitments to extend credit to borrowers aggregating approximately $109,000, and open forward delivery sale contracts aggregating approximately $159,000. Please refer to Note 11 in the consolidated financial statements included herein for a description of our fair value accounting calculation under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, “Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings”.

Contractual Obligations

     Our fixed, non-cancelable obligations as of December 31, 2008, were as follows:

		Payments due by period
						Less than				1-3				3-5				More than
		Total				1 year				years				years				5 years
Debt (a)		$	220,108			$	52,705			$	167,403			$	—			$	—
Capital leases (b)			3,939				637				1,289				1,288				725
Operating leases (c)			69,289				22,478				26,924				14,486				5,401
Purchase obligations (d)			18,000					*				*				*				*
Executive officer employment contracts (e)			5,035				3,330				1,705				—				—
Other long-term liabilities (f)			24,322				23,386				936				—				—
Total		$	340,693			$	102,536			$	198,257			$	15,774			$	6,126

Critical Accounting Policies

     General

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We continually evaluate the estimates we use to prepare the consolidated financial statements, and update those estimates as necessary. In general, our estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and other various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates made by management.

     Variable Interest Entities

     Revised Financial Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46R”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities", requires the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity to consolidate that entity in its financial statements. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the party that absorbs a majority of the variable interest entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual, or other financial interests in the entity. Expected losses are the expected negative variability in the fair value of an entity’s net assets exclusive of its variable interests, and expected residual returns are the expected positive variability in the fair value of an entity’s net assets, exclusive of its variable interests.

     Forward contracts, such as the fixed price purchase agreements utilized by us to acquire finished lot inventory, are deemed to be variable interests under FIN 46R. Therefore, the development entities with which we enter fixed price purchase agreements are examined under FIN 46R for possible consolidation by us, including certain joint venture limited liability corporations (“LLC’s”) utilized by us to acquire finished lots on a limited basis. We have developed a methodology to determine whether we, or, conversely, the owner(s) of the applicable development entity, are the primary beneficiary of a development entity. The methodology used to evaluate our primary beneficiary status requires substantial management judgment and estimates. These judgments and estimates involve assigning probabilities to various estimated cash flow possibilities relative to the development entity’s expected profits and losses and the cash flows associated with changes in the fair value of finished lots under contract. Although we believe that our accounting policy is designed to properly assess our primary beneficiary status relative to our involvement with the development entities from which we acquire finished lots, changes to the probabilities and the cash flow possibilities used in our evaluation could produce widely different conclusions regarding whether we are or are not a development entity’s primary beneficiary, possibly resulting in additional, or fewer, development entities being consolidated on our financial statements. See Note 3 to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

     Homebuilding Inventory

     The carrying value of inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost of lots and completed and uncompleted housing units represent the accumulated actual cost of the units. Field construction supervisors’ salaries and related direct overhead expenses are included in inventory costs. Interest costs are not capitalized into inventory. Upon settlement, the cost of the unit is expensed on a specific identification basis. Cost of manufacturing materials is determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Recoverability and impairment, if any, is primarily evaluated by analyzing sales of comparable assets. We believe that our accounting policy is designed to properly assess the carrying value of homebuilding inventory.

     Contract Land Deposits

     We purchase finished lots under fixed price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the contract. The deposits are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. We maintain an allowance for losses on contract land deposits that we believe is sufficient to provide for losses in the existing contract land deposit portfolio. The allowance reflects our judgment of the present loss exposure at the end of the reporting period, considering market and economic conditions, sales absorption and profitability within specific communities and terms of the various contracts. Although we consider the allowance for losses on contract land deposits reflected on the December 31, 2008 balance sheet to be adequate (see Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements), there can be no assurance that this allowance will prove to be adequate over time to cover losses due to unanticipated adverse changes in the economy or other events adversely affecting specific markets or the homebuilding industry.

     Intangible Assets

     Reorganization value in excess of identifiable assets (“excess reorganization value”), goodwill, and indefinite life intangible assets are not subject to amortization under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). Rather, excess reorganization value, goodwill, and other intangible assets are subject to an impairment assessment on an annual basis or more frequently if changes in events or circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred. We completed our annual assessment of impairment during the first quarter of 2008 and noted no impairment of our goodwill, indefinite life intangible asset or excess reorganization value at that time. However, due to the continued deterioration of the homebuilding market throughout 2008 and the significant impact on the homebuilding market of the credit crisis in the fourth quarter of 2008, we reassessed goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets for impairment in the fourth quarter of 2008. The assessment for goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets is based on the comparison of the net asset value to the fair value of the business unit to which goodwill and/or indefinite life intangible assets have been allocated. The fair value of the business unit is determined based on estimates made by management as to the discounted future cash flows of the respective business unit. As a result of the assessment, we determined that both the goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets related to our Rymarc Homes and Fox Ridge Homes acquisitions were fully impaired. These balances were written off in their entirety as of December 31, 2008. These conclusions are based on management’s judgment, considering such factors as our history of operating success, our brand names, the positions held in all of the markets in which we operate and our expected future cash flows. However, changes in strategy or continued adverse changes in market conditions could impact this judgment and require an impairment loss to be recognized if the amount that the carrying value of excess reorganization value exceeds the fair value.

     Warranty/Product Liability Accruals

     Warranty and product liability accruals are established to provide for estimated future costs as a result of construction and product defects, product recalls and litigation incidental to our business. Liability estimates are determined based on our judgment considering such factors as historical experience, the likely current cost of corrective action, manufacturers’ and subcontractors’ participation in sharing the cost of corrective action, consultations with third party experts such as engineers, and evaluations by our General Counsel and outside counsel retained to handle specific product liability cases. Although we consider the warranty and product liability accrual reflected on the December 31, 2008 balance sheet (see Note 10 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements) to be adequate, there can be no assurance that this accrual will prove to be adequate over time to cover losses due to increased costs for material and labor, the inability or refusal of manufacturers or subcontractors to financially participate in corrective action, unanticipated adverse legal settlements, or other unanticipated changes to the assumptions used to estimate the warranty and product liability accrual.

     Stock Option Expense

     SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R”), requires us to recognize within our income statement compensation costs related to our stock based compensation plans. The costs recognized are based on the grant date fair value. Compensation cost for option grants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award (from the date of grant through the period of the last separately vesting portion of the grant).

     We calculate the fair value of our non-publicly traded, employee stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. While the Black-Scholes model is a widely accepted method to calculate the fair value of options, its results are dependent on input variables, two of which, expected term and expected volatility, are significantly dependent on management’s judgment. We have concluded that our historical exercise experience is the best estimate of future exercise patterns to determine an option’s expected term. To estimate expected volatility, we analyze the historical volatility of our common stock. Changes in management’s judgment of the expected term and the expected volatility could have a material effect on the grant-date fair value calculated and expensed within the income statement. In addition, we are required to estimate future option forfeitures when considering the amount of stock-based compensation costs to record. We have concluded that our historical forfeiture rate is the best measure to estimate future forfeitures of granted stock options. However, there can be no assurance that our future forfeiture rate will not be materially higher or lower than our historical forfeiture rate, which would affect the aggregate cumulative compensation expense recognized.

     Although we believe that the compensation costs recognized during the year ended December 31, 2008 are representative of the cumulative ratable amortization of the grant-date fair value of unvested options outstanding and expected to be exercised, changes to the estimated input values such as expected term and expected volatility could produce widely different fair values. See Notes 1 and 9 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information on our adoption of SFAS No. 123R.

Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices and Economic Conditions

     See Risk Factors included in Item 1A herein.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

     Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our market risk arises from interest rate risk inherent in our financial instruments. Interest rate risk results from the possibility that changes in interest rates will cause unfavorable changes in net income or in the value of interest rate-sensitive assets, liabilities and commitments. Lower interest rates tend to increase demand for mortgage loans for home purchasers, while higher interest rates make it more difficult for potential borrowers to purchase residential properties and to qualify for mortgage loans. We have no market rate sensitive instruments held for speculative or trading purposes.

     Our mortgage banking segment is exposed to interest rate risk as it relates to its lending activities. The mortgage banking segment originates mortgage loans, which are either sold through optional or mandatory forward delivery contracts into the secondary markets. All of the mortgage banking segment’s loan portfolio is held for sale and subject to forward sale commitments. NVRM also sells all of its mortgage servicing rights on a servicing released basis.

     Our homebuilding segment generates operating liquidity and acquires capital assets through fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. The homebuilding segment’s primary debt is a variable-rate working capital revolving credit facility that currently provides for unsecured borrowings up to $600,000, subject to certain borrowing base limitations. The Facility expires in December 2010 and outstanding amounts bear interest at either (i) the prime rate or (ii) LIBOR plus applicable margin as defined within the Facility. There were no borrowings under the Facility during 2008.

     NVRM generates operating liquidity primarily through the mortgage repurchase agreement, which had a borrowing limit of $110,000 at December 31, 2008. The mortgage repurchase agreement is used to fund NVRM’s mortgage origination activities. The Pricing Rate under the mortgage repurchase agreement is either: (i) LIBOR plus 1.55%, or (ii) LIBOR plus 0.20% depending on whether NVRM provides compensating balances. The weighted-average Pricing Rate for amounts outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement was 2.9% during 2008. The average Pricing Rate for amounts outstanding at December 31, 2008 was 1.9%.

     The following table represents the contractual balances of our on-balance sheet financial instruments at the expected maturity dates, as well as the fair values of those on-balance sheet financial instruments at December 31, 2008. The expected maturity categories take into consideration the actual and anticipated amortization of principal and do not take into consideration the reinvestment of cash or the refinancing of existing indebtedness. Because we sell all of the mortgage loans we originate into the secondary markets, we have made the assumption that the portfolio of mortgage loans held for sale will mature in the first year. Consequently, outstanding warehouse borrowings are also assumed to mature in the first year.

Maturities (000’s)

																														Fair
		2009				2010				2011				2012				2013				Thereafter				Total				Value
Mortgage banking segment
Interest rate sensitive assets:
Mortgage loans held for sale		$	71,118				—				—				—				—				—			$	71,118			$	72,488
Average interest rate			5.6	%			—				—				—				—				—				5.6	%
Interest rate sensitive liabilities:
Variable rate repurchase agreement		$	44,539				—				—				—				—				—			$	44,539			$	44,539
Average interest rate (a)			1.9	%			—				—				—				—				—				1.9	%
Other:
Forward trades of mortgage-backed securities (b)		$	(1,743	)			—				—				—				—				—			$	(1,743	)		$	(1,743	)
Forward loan commitments (b)			1,279				—				—				—				—				—				1,279				1,279
Homebuilding segment
Interest rate sensitive assets:
Interest-bearing deposits		$	1,114,701				—				—				—				—				—			$	1,114,701			$	1,114,701
Average interest rate			0.6	%			—				—				—				—				—				0.6	%
Interest rate sensitive liabilities:
Fixed rate obligations (c)		$	127			$	163,673			$	402			$	456			$	520			$	672			$	165,850			$	164,467
Average interest rate			5.1	%			5.2	%			13.1	%			13.2	%			13.3	%			13.3	%			5.2	%

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

     The financial statements listed in Item 15 are filed as part of this report and are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

     None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

     Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2008 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

     There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation referred to above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008. Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which is included herein.

Item 9B. Other Information.

     None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.

     Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2009. Reference is also made regarding our executive officers to “Executive Officers of the Registrant” following Item 4 of Part I of this report.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

     Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2009.

Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

     Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2009.

     Equity Compensation Plan Information

     The table below sets forth information as of the end of our 2008 fiscal year for (i) all equity compensation plans approved by our shareholders and (ii) all equity compensation plans not approved by our shareholders:

Number of securities

remaining available for

Number of securities

future issuance under

to be issued upon

Weighted-average

equity compensation

exercise of

exercise price of

plans (excluding

outstanding options,

outstanding options,

securities reflected in

Plan category

warrants and rights

warrants and rights

the first column)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

152,779

$

358.53

58,707

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

1,264,245

$

288.90

118,588

Total

1,417,024

$

296.41

177,295

     Equity compensation plans approved by our shareholders include the NVR, Inc. Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan; the NVR, Inc. 1998 Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan; and the 1998 Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan. The only equity compensation plan that was not approved by our shareholders is the NVR, Inc. 2000 Broadly-Based Stock Option Plan. See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of each of our equity compensation plans.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

     Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2009.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

     Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2009.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

     The following documents are filed as part of this report:

1.		Financial Statements NVR, Inc. — Consolidated Financial Statements Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Statements of Income Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2.		Exhibits

Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of NVR, Inc. (“NVR”). Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed May 4, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2		Bylaws, as amended, of NVR, Inc. Filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.1		Indenture dated as of April 14, 1998 between NVR, as issuer and the Bank of New York as trustee. Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to NVR’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 23, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.2		Form of Note (included in Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1).
4.3		Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 17, 2003, between NVR and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as successor to The Bank of New York, as trustee. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to NVR’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 17, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.4		Form of Note (included in Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.3).

Exhibit
Number		Description
10.1*		Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dwight C. Schar dated July 1, 2005. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.2*		Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Paul C. Saville dated July 1, 2005. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.3*		Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dennis M. Seremet dated July 1, 2005. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.4*		Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and William J. Inman dated July 1, 2005. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.5*		Profit Sharing Plan of NVR, Inc. and Affiliated Companies. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-29241) filed June 13, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.6*		Employee Stock Ownership Plan of NVR, Inc. Incorporated by reference to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1994.
10.7*		NVR, Inc. 1998 Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 4 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-79951) filed June 4, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.8*		NVR, Inc. 1998 Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 4 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-79949) filed June 4, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.9*		The Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the 1998 Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.10*		NVR, Inc. Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-04975) filed May 31, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.11*		NVR, Inc. 2000 Broadly-Based Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-56732) filed March 8, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.12*		NVR, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.13		Credit Agreement dated as of December 7, 2005 among NVR, Inc. and the lenders party hereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent, SunTrust Bank and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Documentation Agents, AmSouth Bank, Comerica Bank, Calyon New York Branch and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., as Managing Agents, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Sole Book Runner. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed December 12, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.14*		Description of the Board of Directors’ compensation arrangement. Filed as Exhibit 10.27 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.15*		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dwight C. Schar dated December 21, 2006. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed December 22, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit
Number		Description
10.16		Fifteenth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of August 24, 2006 between NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Guaranty Bank, Comerica Bank, National City Bank and Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed August 24, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.17		Commitment and Acceptance dated March 27, 2006 increasing the commitment under NVR, Inc.’s existing revolving credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders that are parties thereto, dated December 7, 2005 by $45 million to an aggregate commitment of $445 million. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed March 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.18		Commitment and Acceptance dated August 16, 2006 increasing the commitment under NVR, Inc.’s existing revolving credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders that are parties thereto, dated December 7, 2005 by $155 million to an aggregate commitment of $600 million. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed August 17, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.19*		Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dwight C. Schar dated November 6, 2007. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed November 7, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.20*		The Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the NVR, Inc. 2000 Broadly Based Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed January 3, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.21*		The Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the 1998 Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.34 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.22		Repurchase Agreement dated August 5, 2008 among NVR Finance and U.S. Bank National Association, as Agent, and other lenders party thereto. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.23*		Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dwight C. Schar dated November 6, 2008. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed November 6, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.24*		Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dwight C. Schar dated January 1, 2009. Filed herewith.
10.25*		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Paul C. Saville dated January 1, 2009. Filed herewith.
10.26*		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and William J. Inman dated January 1, 2009. Filed herewith.
10.27*		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dennis M. Seremet dated July 30, 2008. Filed herewith.
10.28*		Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dennis M. Seremet dated January 1, 2009. Filed herewith.
10.29*		Summary of 2009 Named Executive Officer annual incentive compensation plan. Filed herewith.
21		NVR, Inc. Subsidiaries. Filed herewith.
23		Consent of KPMG LLP (Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm). Filed herewith.

Exhibit
Number		Description
31.1		Certification of NVR’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). Filed herewith.
31.2		Certification of NVR’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). Filed herewith.
32		Certification of NVR’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

NVR, Inc.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature		Title		Date
/s/ Dwight C. Schar		Chairman
Dwight C. Schar				February 25, 2009
/s/ C. E. Andrews		Director
C. E. Andrews				February 25, 2009
/s/ C. Scott Bartlett, Jr.		Director
C. Scott Bartlett, Jr.				February 25, 2009
/s/ Robert C. Butler		Director
Robert C. Butler				February 25, 2009
/s/ Timothy M. Donahue		Director
Timothy M. Donahue				February 25, 2009
/s/ Alfred E. Festa		Director
Alfred E. Festa				February 25, 2009
/s/ Manuel H. Johnson		Director
Manuel H. Johnson				February 25, 2009
/s/ William A. Moran		Director
William A. Moran				February 25, 2009
/s/ David A. Preiser		Director
David A. Preiser				February 25, 2009
/s/ W. Grady Rosier		Director
W. Grady Rosier				February 25, 2009

Signature		Title		Date
/s/ John M. Toups		Director
John M. Toups				February 25, 2009
/s/ Paul W. Whetsell		Director
Paul W. Whetsell				February 25, 2009
/s/ Paul C. Saville		Principal Executive Officer
Paul C. Saville				February 25, 2009
/s/ Dennis M. Seremet		Principal Financial Officer
Dennis M. Seremet				February 25, 2009
/s/ Robert W. Henley		Principal Accounting Officer
Robert W. Henley				February 25, 2009

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
NVR, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NVR, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), NVR, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 25, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
February 25, 2009

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
NVR, Inc.:

We have audited NVR, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). NVR, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, NVR, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of NVR, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and our report dated February 25, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
February 25, 2009

NVR, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

		December 31,
		2008				2007
ASSETS
Homebuilding:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	1,146,426			$	660,709
Receivables			11,594				10,855
Inventory:
Lots and housing units, covered under sales agreements with customers			335,238				573,895
Unsold lots and housing units			57,639				105,838
Manufacturing materials and other			7,693				9,121
			400,570				688,854
Contract land deposits, net			29,073				188,528
Assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R			114,930				180,206
Property, plant and equipment, net			25,658				32,911
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets, net			41,580				41,580
Goodwill and indefinite life intangibles, net			—				11,686
Definite life intangibles, net			—				96
Deferred tax assets, net			223,393				211,808
Other assets			19,233				40,653
			2,012,457				2,067,886
Mortgage Banking:
Cash and cash equivalents			1,217				3,500
Mortgage loans held for sale, net			72,488				107,338
Property and equipment, net			759				881
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets, net			7,347				7,347
Other assets			8,968				7,464
			90,779				126,530
Total assets		$	2,103,236			$	2,194,416

(Continued)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

NVR, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

		December 31,
		2008				2007
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Homebuilding:
Accounts payable		$	137,285			$	219,048
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			194,869				251,475
Liabilities related to assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R			109,439				164,369
Customer deposits			59,623				125,315
Other term debt			2,530				2,820
Senior notes			163,320				200,000
			667,066				963,027
Mortgage Banking:
Accounts payable and other liabilities			17,842				18,551
Notes payable			44,539				83,463
			62,381				102,014
Total liabilities			729,447				1,065,041
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 20,561,187 and 20,592,640 shares issued for December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively			206				206
Additional paid-in-capital			722,265				663,631
Deferred compensation trust- 514,470 and 516,085 shares of NVR, Inc. common stock as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively			(74,978	)			(75,636	)
Deferred compensation liability			74,978				75,636
Retained earnings			3,630,887				3,529,995
Less treasury stock at cost — 15,028,335 and 15,455,086 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively			(2,979,569	)			(3,064,457	)
Total shareholders’ equity			1,373,789				1,129,375
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	2,103,236			$	2,194,416

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

NVR, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data)

		Year Ended				Year Ended				Year Ended
		December 31, 2008				December 31, 2007				December 31, 2006
Homebuilding:
Revenues		$	3,638,702			$	5,048,187			$	6,036,236
Other income			16,386				21,118				13,609
Cost of sales			(3,181,010	)			(4,227,059	)			(4,701,265	)
Selling, general and administrative			(308,739	)			(343,520	)			(432,319	)
Operating income			165,339				498,726				916,261
Interest expense			(12,902	)			(13,150	)			(18,423	)
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment			(11,686	)			—				—
Homebuilding income			140,751				485,576				897,838
Mortgage Banking:
Mortgage banking fees			54,337				81,155				97,888
Interest income			3,955				4,900				7,704
Other income			745				1,060				1,334
General and administrative			(31,579	)			(32,505	)			(38,988	)
Interest expense			(754	)			(681	)			(2,805	)
Mortgage banking income			26,704				53,929				65,133
Income before taxes			167,455				539,505				962,971
Income tax expense			(66,563	)			(205,550	)			(375,559	)
Net income		$	100,892			$	333,955			$	587,412
Basic earnings per share		$	18.76			$	61.61			$	104.08
Diluted earnings per share		$	17.04			$	54.14			$	88.05
Basic weighted average shares outstanding			5,379				5,420				5,644
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding			5,920				6,168				6,672