UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)

For the transition period from                      to                     

NVR, Inc.

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia		54-1394360
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS employer identification number)

11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500
Reston, Virginia 20190
(703) 956-4000

 

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share		American Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as described in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ 

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of NVR, Inc. on June 30, 2006, the last business day of the NVR Inc.’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $2.4 billion.

As of February 16, 2007 there were 5,677,792 total shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement of NVR, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on or prior to April 30, 2007 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

 

 

INDEX

				Page
PART I
Item 1.		Business			2
Item 1A.		Risk Factors			6
Item 1B.		Unresolved Staff Comments			9
Item 2.		Properties			10
Item 3.		Legal Proceedings			10
Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			10
		Executive Officers of the Registrant			11
PART II
Item 5.		Market for Registrants’ Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			11
Item 6.		Selected Financial Data			14
Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			15
Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk			32
Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			34
Item 9.		Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure			34
Item 9A.		Controls and Procedures			34
Item 9B.		Other Information			34
PART III
Item 10.		Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance			35
Item 11.		Executive Compensation			35
Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters			35
Item 13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			36
Item 14.		Principal Accountant Fees and Services			36
PART IV
Item 15.		Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules			36

PART I

Item 1.		Business.

General

     NVR, Inc. (“NVR”) was formed in 1980 as NVHomes, Inc. NVR’s primary business is the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings. To fully serve our homebuilding customers, we also operate a mortgage banking business. NVR conducts its homebuilding activities directly, except for Rymarc Homes, which is operated as a wholly owned subsidiary, and its mortgage banking operations, which is operated primarily through a wholly owned subsidiary, NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (“NVRM”). Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “NVR”, “we”, “us” or “our” include NVR and its consolidated subsidiaries.

     We are one of the largest homebuilders in the United States. While we operate in multiple locations in thirteen states, primarily in the eastern part of the United States, approximately 37% of our home settlements in 2006 occurred in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD metropolitan areas, which accounted for 52% of our 2006 homebuilding revenues. Our homebuilding operations include the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings under four trade names: Ryan Homes, NVHomes, Fox Ridge Homes and Rymarc Homes. The Ryan Homes, Fox Ridge Homes, and Rymarc Homes products are marketed primarily to first-time homeowners and first-time move-up buyers. The Ryan Homes product is currently sold in twenty-one metropolitan areas located in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Ohio, New Jersey, Delaware, Michigan and Kentucky. The Fox Ridge Homes product is sold solely in the Nashville, TN metropolitan area and the Rymarc Homes product is sold solely in the Columbia, South Carolina market. The NVHomes product is marketed primarily to move-up and upscale buyers and is sold in the Washington, D.C., Baltimore, MD, Philadelphia, PA and the Maryland Eastern Shore metropolitan areas. In 2006, our average price of a unit settled was approximately $398,000.

     We do not engage in the land development business. Instead, we acquire finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under fixed price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage, typically ranging up to 10%, of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots.

     Our lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and land development. We may, at our option, choose for any reason and at any time not to perform under these purchase agreements by delivering notice of our intent not to acquire the finished lots under contract. Our sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under these purchase agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidating damage provision contained within the purchase agreements. We do not have any financial guarantees or completion obligations and we do not guarantee specific performance under these purchase agreements. We generally seek to maintain control over a supply of lots believed to be suitable to meet our five-year business plan.

     On a very limited basis, we also obtain finished lots using joint venture limited liability corporations (“LLC’s”). All LLC’s are structured such that we are a non-controlling member and are at risk only for the amount we have invested. We are not a borrower, guarantor or obligor on any of the LLC’s debt. We enter into a standard fixed price purchase agreement to purchase lots from these LLC’s. At December 31, 2006, we had an aggregate investment in twelve separate LLC’s totaling approximately $14 million, which controlled approximately 800 lots.

     In addition to building and selling homes, we provide a number of mortgage-related services through our mortgage banking operations. Through operations in each of our homebuilding markets, NVRM originates mortgage loans almost exclusively for our homebuyers. NVRM generates revenues

primarily from origination fees, gains on sales of loans and title fees. NVRM sells all of the mortgage loans it closes into the secondary markets on a servicing released basis.

     Segment information for our homebuilding and mortgage banking businesses is included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

Homebuilding

     Products

     We offer single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings with many different basic home designs. These home designs have a variety of elevations and numerous other options. Our homes combine traditional or colonial exterior designs with contemporary interior designs and amenities, generally include two to four bedrooms, and range from approximately 1,000 to 7,300 square feet. During 2006, the prices of our homes ranged from approximately $90,000 to $2,600,000 and averaged approximately $398,000.

     Markets

     Our four reportable homebuilding segments operate in the following geographic regions:

Mid Atlantic:		Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia and Delaware
North East:		Eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Mid East:		Kentucky, Michigan, New York, Ohio and western Pennsylvania
South East:		North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee

     Further discussion of settlements, new orders and backlog activity by homebuilding reportable segment for each of the last three years can be found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (see Item 7 of this report).

     Backlog

     Backlog totaled 6,388 units and approximately $2.6 billion at December 31, 2006 compared to backlog of 8,310 units and approximately $3.7 billion at December 31, 2005. Our cancellation rate was approximately 19% during 2006. During 2005 and 2004, our cancellation rates were approximately 12% and 11%, respectively. We can provide no assurance that our historical cancellation rate is indicative of the actual cancellation rate that may occur in 2007. See Risk Factors in Item 1A.

     Construction

     We utilize independent subcontractors under fixed price contracts to perform construction work on our homes. The subcontractors’ work is performed under the supervision of our employees who monitor quality control. We use many independent subcontractors in our various markets and we are not dependent on any single subcontractor or on a small number of subcontractors.

     Land Development

     We are not in the land development business. We purchase finished lots from various land developers under fixed price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage, typically ranging up to 10%, of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. We are not dependent on any single developer or on a small number of developers.

     Sales and Marketing

     Our preferred marketing method is for customers to visit a furnished model home featuring many built-in options and a landscaped lot. The garages of these model homes are usually converted into temporary sales centers where alternative facades and floor plans are displayed and designs for other models are available for review. Sales representatives are compensated predominantly on a commission basis.

     Regulation

     We and our subcontractors must comply with various federal, state and local zoning, building, environmental, advertising and consumer credit statutes, rules and regulations, as well as other regulations and requirements in connection with our construction and sales activities. All of these regulations have increased the cost to produce and market our products, and in some instances, have delayed our developers’ abilities to deliver us finished lots. Counties and cities in which we build homes have at times declared moratoriums on the issuance of building permits and imposed other restrictions in the areas in which sewage treatment facilities and other public facilities do not reach minimum standards. To date, restrictive zoning laws and the imposition of moratoriums have not had a material adverse effect on our construction activities. However, in certain markets in which we operate, we believe that our growth has been hampered by the longer time periods necessary for our developers to obtain the necessary governmental approvals.

     Competition and Market Factors

     The housing industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous homebuilders of varying size, ranging from local to national in scope, some of which have greater financial resources than we do. We also face competition from the home resale market. Our homebuilding operations compete primarily on the basis of price, location, design, quality, service and reputation. We historically have been one of the market leaders in each of the markets where we build homes.

     The housing industry is cyclical and is affected by consumer confidence levels, prevailing economic conditions and interest rates. Other factors that affect the housing industry and the demand for new homes include the availability and the cost of land, labor and materials; changes in consumer preferences; demographic trends; and the availability of mortgage finance programs. See Risk Factors in Item 1A.

     We are dependent upon building material suppliers for a continuous flow of raw materials. Whenever possible, we utilize standard products available from multiple sources. In the past, such raw materials have been generally available to us in adequate supply.

Mortgage Banking

     We provide a number of mortgage related services to our homebuilding customers through our mortgage banking operations. Our mortgage banking operations also include separate subsidiaries that broker title insurance and perform title searches in connection with mortgage loan closings for which they receive commissions and fees. Because NVRM originates mortgage loans almost exclusively for our homebuilding customers, NVRM is dependent on our homebuilding segment. In 2006, NVRM closed approximately 12,200 loans with an aggregate principal amount of approximately $3.9 billion.

     NVRM sells all of the mortgage loans it closes to investors in the secondary markets on a servicing released basis, typically within 30 days from the loan closing. NVRM is an approved seller/servicer for FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, VA and FHA mortgage loans.

     Competition and Market Factors

     NVRM’s main competition comes from national, regional, and local mortgage bankers, mortgage brokers, thrifts and banks in each of these markets. NVRM competes primarily on the basis of customer service, variety of products offered, interest rates offered, prices of ancillary services and relative financing availability and costs.

     Regulation

     NVRM is an approved seller/servicer of FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, FHA and VA mortgage loans, and is subject to all of those agencies’ rules and regulations. These rules and regulations restrict certain activities of NVRM. NVRM is currently eligible and expects to remain eligible to participate in such programs. In addition, NVRM is subject to regulation at the state and federal level with respect to specific origination, selling and servicing practices.

     Pipeline

     NVRM’s mortgage loans in process that have not closed (“Pipeline”) at December 31, 2006 and 2005, had an aggregate principal balance of $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively. Our cancellation rate was approximately 35% in 2006. During 2005 and 2004, our cancellation rates were approximately 27% and 24%, respectively. We can provide no assurance that the prior year cancellation rate is indicative of the actual cancellation rate that may occur in 2007. See Risk Factors in Item 1A.

Employees

     At December 31, 2006, we employed 4,548 full-time persons, of whom 1,770 were officers and management personnel, 290 were technical and construction personnel, 1,041 were sales personnel, 642 were administrative personnel and 805 were engaged in various other service and labor activities. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our employee relations are good.

Available Information

     We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document we file at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room.

     Our principal Internet website can be found at http://www.nvrinc.com. We make available free of charge on or through our website, access to our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed, or furnished, to the SEC.

     Our website also includes a corporate governance section which contains the our Corporate Governance Guidelines (which includes our Directors’ Independence Standards), Code of Ethics, Board of Directors’ Committee Charters for the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance, Nominating and Qualified Legal Compliance Committees, Policies and Procedures for the Consideration of Board of Director Candidates and Policies and Procedures on Securityholder Communications with the Board of Directors. Additionally, amendments to and waivers from a provision of the Code of Ethics that apply to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions will be disclosed on our website (of which there were none in 2006).

     In addition, you may request a copy of the foregoing filings (excluding exhibits), charters, guidelines and codes, and any waivers or amendments to such codes which are applicable to our executive officers, senior financial officers or directors, at no cost by writing to us at NVR, Inc., 11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20190, Attention: Investor Relations Department or by telephoning us at (703) 956-4000.

Item 1A.		Risk Factors.

Forward-Looking Statements

     Some of the statements in this Form 10-K, as well as statements made by NVR, Inc. (“NVR”) in periodic press releases or other public communications, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Certain, but not necessarily all, of such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. All statements other than of historical facts are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements contained in this document include those regarding market trends, NVR’s financial position, business strategy, projected plans and objectives of management for future operations. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results or performance of NVR to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such risk factors include, but are not limited to the following: general economic and business conditions (on both a national and regional level); interest rate changes; access to suitable financing; competition; the availability and cost of land and other raw materials used by NVR in its homebuilding operations; shortages of labor; weather related slow-downs; building moratoriums; governmental regulation; the ability of NVR to integrate any acquired business; fluctuation and volatility of stock and other financial markets; and other factors over which NVR has little or no control.

RISK FACTORS

     Our business is affected by the risks generally incident to the residential construction business, including, but not limited to:

	•		actual and expected direction of interest rates, which affect our costs, the availability of construction financing, and long-term financing for potential purchasers of homes;
	•		the availability of adequate land in desirable locations on favorable terms;
	•		unexpected changes in customer preferences; and
	•		changes in the national economy and in the local economies of the markets in which we have operations.

Interest rate movements, inflation and other economic factors can negatively impact our business.

     High rates of inflation generally affect the homebuilding industry adversely because of their adverse impact on interest rates. High interest rates not only increase the cost of borrowed funds to homebuilders but also have a significant effect on housing demand and on the affordability of permanent mortgage financing to prospective purchasers. We are also subject to potential volatility in the price of commodities that impact costs of materials used in our homebuilding business. Increases in prevailing interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

     Our financial results also are affected by the risks generally incident to our mortgage banking business, including interest rate levels, the impact of government regulation on mortgage loan originations and servicing and the need to issue forward commitments to fund and sell mortgage loans. Our homebuilding customers accounted for almost all of our mortgage banking business in 2006. The volume of our continuing

homebuilding operations therefore affects our mortgage banking business.

     Our operations may also be adversely affected by other economic factors within our markets such as negative changes in employment levels, job growth, and consumer confidence, one or all of which could result in reduced demand or price depression from current levels. Such negative trends could have a material adverse effect on homebuilding operations.

     Our mortgage banking business also is affected by interest rate fluctuations. We also may experience marketing losses resulting from daily increases in interest rates to the extent we are unable to match interest rates and amounts on loans we have committed to originate with forward commitments from third parties to purchase such loans. Increases in interest rates may have a material adverse effect on our mortgage banking revenue, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

     These factors and thus, the homebuilding business, have at times in the past been cyclical in nature. Any downturn in the national economy or the local economies of the markets in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations. In particular, approximately 37% of our home settlements during 2006 occurred in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD metropolitan areas, which accounted for 52% of our 2006 homebuilding revenues. Thus, we are dependent to a significant extent on the economy and demand for housing in those areas.

Our inability to secure and control an adequate inventory of lots could adversely impact our operations.

     The results of our homebuilding operations are dependent upon our continuing ability to control an adequate number of homebuilding lots in desirable locations. There can be no assurance that an adequate supply of building lots will continue to be available to us on terms similar to those available in the past, or that we will not be required to devote a greater amount of capital to controlling building lots than we have historically. An insufficient supply of building lots in one or more of our markets, an inability of our developers to deliver finished lots in a timely fashion, or our inability to purchase or finance building lots on reasonable terms could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

If the market value of our inventory declines, our profit could decrease.

     Inventory risk can be substantial for homebuilders. The market value of building lots and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions. In addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses in a poorly performing project or market. We must, in the ordinary course of our business, continuously seek and make acquisitions of lots for expansion into new markets as well as for replacement and expansion within our current markets. In the event of significant changes in economic or market conditions, we may dispose of certain subdivision inventories on a bulk or other basis which may result in a loss which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

Our current indebtedness may impact our future operations and our ability to access necessary financing.

     Our homebuilding operations are dependent in part on the availability and cost of working capital financing, and may be adversely affected by a shortage or an increase in the cost of such financing. If we require working capital greater than that provided by our operations and our credit facility, we may be required to seek to increase the amount available under the facility or to obtain alternative financing. No assurance can be given that additional or replacement financing will be available on terms that are favorable or acceptable. If we are at any time unsuccessful in obtaining sufficient capital to fund our planned homebuilding expenditures, we may experience a substantial delay in the completion of any homes then under construction. Any delay could result in cost increases and could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

     Our existing indebtedness contains financial and other restrictive covenants and any future indebtedness may also contain covenants. These covenants include limitations on our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, pay cash dividends and make distributions, make loans and investments, enter into transactions with affiliates, effect certain asset sales, incur certain liens, merge or consolidate with any other person, or transfer all or substantially all of our properties and assets. Substantial losses by us or other action or inaction by us or our subsidiaries could result in the violation of one or more of these covenants which could result in decreased liquidity or a default on our indebtedness, thereby having a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

     Our mortgage banking operations are dependent on the availability, cost and other terms of mortgage warehouse financing, and may be adversely affected by any shortage or increased cost of such financing. No assurance can be given that any additional or replacement financing will be available on terms that are favorable or acceptable. Our mortgage banking operations are also dependent upon the securitization market for mortgage-backed securities, and could be materially adversely affected by any fluctuation or downturn in such market.

Government regulations and environmental matters could negatively affect our operations.

     We are subject to various local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, building design, construction and similar matters, including local regulations that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the number of homes that can eventually be built within the boundaries of a particular area. We have from time to time been subject to, and may also be subject in the future to, periodic delays in our homebuilding projects due to building moratoriums in the areas in which we operate. Changes in regulations that restrict homebuilding activities in one or more of our principal markets could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

     We are also subject to a variety of local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the protection of health and the environment. We are subject to a variety of environmental conditions that can affect our business and our homebuilding projects. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given homebuilding site vary greatly according to the location and environmental condition of the site and the present and former uses of the site and adjoining properties. Environmental laws and conditions may result in delays, cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, or prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding activity in certain environmentally sensitive regions or areas, thereby adversely affecting our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

     We are an approved seller/servicer of FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, FHA and VA mortgage loans, and are subject to all of those agencies’ rules and regulations. Any significant impairment of our eligibility to sell/service these loans could have a material adverse impact on our mortgage operations. In addition, we are subject to regulation at the state and federal level with respect to specific origination, selling and servicing practices. Adverse changes in governmental regulation may have a negative impact on our mortgage loan origination business.

We face competition in our housing and mortgage banking operations.

     The homebuilding industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous homebuilders of varying size, ranging from local to national in scope, some of whom have greater financial resources than we do. We face competition:

	•		for suitable and desirable lots at acceptable prices;
	•		from selling incentives offered by competing builders within and across developments; and
	•		from the existing home resale market.

     Our homebuilding operations compete primarily on the basis of price, location, design, quality, service and reputation. Historically we have been one of the leading homebuilders in each of the markets where we operate.

     The mortgage banking industry is also competitive. Our main competition comes from national, regional and local mortgage bankers, thrifts, banks and mortgage brokers in each of these markets. Our mortgage banking operations compete primarily on the basis of customer service, variety of products offered, interest rates offered, prices of ancillary services and relative financing availability and costs.

     There can be no assurance that we will continue to compete successfully in our homebuilding or mortgage banking operations. An inability to effectively compete may have an adverse impact on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

A shortage of building materials or labor may adversely impact our operations.

     The homebuilding business has from time to time experienced building material and labor shortages, including shortages in insulation, drywall, certain carpentry work and concrete, as well as fluctuating lumber prices and supply. In addition, high employment levels and strong construction market conditions could restrict the labor force available to our subcontractors and us in one or more of our markets. Significant increases in costs resulting from these shortages, or delays in construction of homes, could have a material adverse effect upon our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

Product liability litigation and warranty claims may adversely impact our operations.

     Construction defect and home warranty claims are common and can represent a substantial risk for the homebuilding industry. The cost of insuring against construction defect and product liability claims, as well as the claims themselves, can be high. In addition, insurance companies limit coverage offered to protect against these claims. Further restrictions on coverage available, or significant increases in premium costs or claims could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of tax laws may negatively affect our operating results.

     We believe that our recorded tax balances are adequate. However, it is not possible to predict the effects of possible changes in the tax laws or changes in their interpretation and whether they could have a material negative impact on our operating results.

Weather-related and other events beyond our control may adversely impact our operations.

     Extreme weather or other events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, forest fires, floods, terrorist attacks or war, may affect our markets, our operations and our profitability. These events may impact our physical facilities or those of our suppliers or subcontractors, causing us material increases in costs, or delays in construction of homes, which could have a material adverse effect upon our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

Item 1B.		Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.		Properties.

     Our corporate offices are located in Reston, Virginia, where we currently lease approximately 61,000 square feet of office space. The current corporate office lease expires in April 2015.

     In connection with the operation of the homebuilding segment, we lease manufacturing facilities in the following six locations: Thurmont, Maryland; Burlington County, New Jersey; Farmington, New York; Kings Mountain, North Carolina; Darlington, Pennsylvania; and Portland, Tennessee. These facilities range in size from approximately 40,000 square feet to 400,000 square feet and combined total approximately 1,000,000 square feet of manufacturing space. All of our manufacturing facilities are leased. Each of these leases contains various options for extensions of the lease and for the purchase of the facility. The Portland lease expires in 2009. The Thurmont and Farmington leases expire in 2014, and the Kings Mountain and Burlington County leases expire in 2023 and 2024, respectively. The Darlington lease expires in 2025.

     We also lease office space in multiple locations for homebuilding divisional offices and mortgage banking and title services branches under leases expiring at various times through 2012, none of which are individually material to our business. We anticipate that, upon expiration of existing leases, we will be able to renew them or obtain comparable facilities on acceptable terms.

Item 3.		Legal Proceedings. (in thousands)

     We are involved in various claims and litigation arising principally in the ordinary course of business. At this time, we are not involved in any legal proceedings that we believe are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

     In 2006 and 2005, we received requests for information pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Clean Water Act (the “Act”) from Regions 3 and 4 of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”). The requests sought information regarding our storm water management discharge practices in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia during the homebuilding construction process. We have either provided the EPA with information in response to each of its requests, or are working with the EPA to provide the requested information. Additionally, in 2005, the EPA notified us of alleged storm water management violations under the Act at a homebuilding site in Pennsylvania, and that we may potentially be subject to administrative fines of up to $157 for the alleged violations. We have completed our building activity at the homebuilding site alleged to be in violation. We cannot predict the outcome of the EPA’s review of our storm water management practices. Further, it is not known at this time whether the EPA will seek to take legal action or impose penalties in connection with the alleged violation at the construction site in Pennsylvania.

Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

     No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended December 31, 2006.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Name		Age				Positions
Dwight C. Schar			65			Chairman of the Board of NVR
William J. Inman			59			President of NVRM
Paul C. Saville			51			President and Chief Executive Officer of NVR
Dennis M. Seremet			51			Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of NVR
Robert W. Henley			40			Vice President and Controller of NVR

Dwight C. Schar has been Chairman of the Board since September 30, 1993. Mr. Schar also served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from September 30, 1993 through June 30, 2005.

William J. Inman has been President of NVRM since January 1992.

Paul C. Saville was named President and Chief Executive Officer of NVR, effective July 1, 2005. Prior to July 1, 2005, Mr. Saville had served as Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of NVR since September 30, 1993 and Executive Vice President from January 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005.

Dennis M. Seremet was named Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of NVR, effective July 1, 2005. Prior to July 1, 2005, Mr. Seremet had been Vice President and Controller of NVR since April 1, 1995, and was named Senior Vice President on January 1, 2005.

Robert W. Henley was named Vice President and Controller of NVR effective July 1, 2005. Prior to July 1, 2005, Mr. Henley served as Manager of SEC Reporting from 1995 through 2000. In 2000, Mr. Henley was appointed to the position of Assistant Controller.

PART II

Item 5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

     Our shares of common stock are listed and principally traded on the American Stock Exchange. The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices per share for our common stock for each fiscal quarter during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:

		HIGH				LOW
Prices per Share:
2006:
First Quarter		$	822.88			$	706.50
Second Quarter		$	842.98			$	486.00
Third Quarter		$	586.00			$	394.00
Fourth Quarter		$	672.00			$	517.00
2005:
First Quarter		$	808.00			$	709.00
Second Quarter		$	810.00			$	712.50
Third Quarter		$	938.00			$	799.50
Fourth Quarter		$	886.00			$	660.00

     As of the close of business on February 16, 2007, there were 425 shareholders of record.

     We have never paid a cash dividend on our shares of common stock. Our bank indebtedness

contains certain restrictive covenants, which limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock. See further discussion of the restrictive covenants in the Liquidity section of Part II, Item 7 of the Form 10-K.

     We had one repurchase authorization outstanding during the quarter ended December 31, 2006. On June 23, 2006 (the “June Authorization”), we publicly announced the Board of Directors’ approval for us to purchase up to an aggregate of $300 million of our common stock in one or more open market and/or privately negotiated transactions under the authorization. The June Authorization does not have an expiration date. The following table provides information regarding common stock repurchases for the quarter ended December 31, 2006:

														Maximum Number (or
														Approximate Dollar
										Total Number of				Value) of Shares
										Shares Purchased as				That May Yet Be
										Part of Publicly				Purchased Under the
		Total Number of				Average Price Paid				Announced Plans or				Plans or Programs
Period		Shares Purchased				per Share				Programs				(in thousands)
October 1—31, 2006			134,100			$	542.32				134,100			$	164,805
November 1—30, 2006			58,100			$	534.46				58,100			$	133,753
December 1—31, 2006			—			$	—				—			$	133,753

Stock Performance Graph

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL EQUITYHOLDER RETURN ON EQUITY

     The following chart graphs our performance in the form of cumulative total return to holders of our Common Stock since December 31, 2001 in comparison to the Dow/Home Construction Index and the Dow Jones Industrial Index for that same period. The Dow/Home Construction Index includes NVR, Inc., Pulte Homes, Inc., Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Ryland Group, Inc., Centex Corp., KB Home, Champion Enterprises, Inc., Lennar Corp., DR Horton, Inc., MDC Holdings, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Standard Pacific Corp., Meritage Homes Corp., WCI Communities, Inc. and Toll Brothers, Inc.

(a) Assumes that $100 was invested in NVR stock and the indices on December 31, 2001.

Item 6.		Selected Financial Data. (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

     The following tables set forth selected consolidated financial data. The selected income statement and balance sheet data have been extracted from our consolidated financial statements for each of the periods presented and is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

		Year Ended December 31,
		2006				2005				2004				2003				2002
Consolidated Income Statement Data:
Homebuilding data:
Revenues		$	6,036,236			$	5,177,743			$	4,247,503			$	3,600,917			$	3,060,671
Gross profit			1,334,971				1,439,713				1,091,217				889,056				725,302
Mortgage Banking data:
Mortgage banking fees			97,888				84,604				72,219				76,647				65,454
Interest income			7,704				5,014				4,249				5,198				6,184
Interest expense			2,805				1,759				1,088				1,293				1,870
Consolidated data:
Income from continuing operations (1)		$	587,412			$	697,559			$	523,204			$	419,791			$	331,470
Income from continuing operations per diluted share (2)		$	88.05			$	89.61			$	66.42			$	48.39			$	36.05

		December 31,
		2006				2005				2004				2003				2002
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Homebuilding inventory		$	733,616			$	793,975			$	588,540			$	523,773			$	436,674
Contract land deposits, net			402,170				517,241				362,990				268,463				217,960
Total assets			2,473,808				2,237,669				1,755,998				1,347,136				1,169,019
Notes and loans payable			356,632				463,141				213,803				257,859				259,160
Shareholders’ equity			1,152,074				677,162				834,995				494,868				403,245
Cash dividends per share			—				—				—				—				—

Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004

Overview

Business

     Our primary business is the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings. To fully serve our homebuilding customers, we also operate a mortgage banking and title services business. We primarily conduct our operations in mature supply-constrained markets. Additionally, we generally grow our business through market share gains in our existing markets and by expanding into markets contiguous to our current active markets. Our four homebuilding reportable segments consist of the following regions:

Mid Atlantic:		Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia and Delaware
North East:		Eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Mid East:		Kentucky, Michigan, New York, Ohio and western Pennsylvania
South East:		North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee

     We believe we operate our business with a conservative operating strategy. We do not engage in land development and primarily construct homes on a pre-sold basis. This strategy allows us to maximize inventory turnover, which enables us to minimize market risk and to operate with less capital, thereby enhancing rates of return on equity and total capital. In addition, we focus on obtaining and maintaining a leading market position in each market we serve. This strategy allows us to gain valuable efficiencies and competitive advantages in our markets, which we believe contributes to minimizing the adverse effects of regional economic cycles and provides growth opportunities within these markets.

     Because we are not active in the land development business, our continued success is contingent upon our ability to control an adequate supply of finished lots on which to build, and on our developers’ ability to timely deliver finished lots to meet the sales demands of our customers. Timely delivery of lots by our developers can be influenced by many factors, such as the developer’s execution of improvements, weather-related impacts, and the length of time necessary to obtain governmental approval of projects.

     We acquire finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under fixed price purchase agreements (“purchase agreements”). These purchase agreements require deposits in the form of cash or letters of credit that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the purchase agreement. However, we believe that this lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and development. As of December 31, 2006, we controlled approximately 88,500 lots with deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately $484,000 and $14,000, respectively. We also controlled approximately 800 lots through investments in joint venture limited liability corporations.

     Consolidated revenues for 2006 increased 17% from 2005 driven primarily by our homebuilding business producing 10% higher settlement volume and a 6% higher average settlement price per unit in 2006. Consolidated net income and diluted earnings per share decreased 16% and 2%, respectively, in 2006 from 2005. Net income and diluted earnings per share were negatively impacted by pre-tax contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $174,000 in 2006.

Current Environment

     The home sales environment in 2006 was characterized by an increase in the number of existing and new homes available for sale and declining homebuyer confidence. As a result of these market conditions, new orders for 2006 were down 10% from the prior year and we experienced an increase in our cancellation rate to 19% in 2006 from 12% in 2005. Cancellation rates were the highest in our Washington, D.C. region,

where they increased to 29% for the year ended 2006 from 14% in 2005, and for the fourth quarter increased to 34% in 2006 from 18% in the fourth quarter of 2005. Additionally, prevailing market conditions exerted downward pressure on selling prices, and in response, we increased incentives to homebuyers and reduced prices in many of our markets. These pricing pressures led to a 7% decrease in the average selling price for new orders in 2006 as compared to 2005. Average selling prices for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006 were down 10% from the same period in 2005. We are actively involved in implementing steps to address the currently challenging homebuilding market. In certain communities, we are seeking concessions from our developers to reduce lot purchase prices to current market values and/or to defer scheduled lot purchases. In communities where we are unsuccessful in negotiating necessary concessions, we may exit the community and forfeit our deposit. During 2006, we incurred contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $174,000 from such actual or expected terminations. In 2005, contract land deposit impairment charges totaled approximately $12,600. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information regarding contract land deposits.

     Homebuilding gross profit margins have been negatively impacted by the aforementioned lower selling prices and contract land deposit impairment charges in 2006, reducing gross profit margins to 22.1% in 2006 from 27.8% in 2005. We expect that the reduction in average selling prices experienced in 2006 and the continuing uncertainty in many of the markets in which we operate may further negatively impact gross profit margins in future periods.

     During 2006 we reduced our staffing levels by approximately 16% to size our organization to meet the current expected level of sales activity, and we consolidated certain of our homebuilding profit centers. We will continue to assess our staffing levels and organizational structure as conditions warrant.

Homebuilding Operations

     The following table summarizes the results of our consolidated homebuilding operations and certain operating activity for each of the last three years:

		Year Ended December 31,
		2006				2005				2004
Revenues		$	6,036,236			$	5,177,743			$	4,247,503
Cost of sales		$	4,701,265			$	3,738,030			$	3,156,286
Gross profit margin percentage			22.1	%			27.8	%			25.7	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		$	432,319			$	345,525			$	260,795
Settlements (units)			15,139				13,787				12,749
Average settlement price		$	398.2			$	374.9			$	332.2
New orders (units)			13,217				14,653				13,231
Average new order price		$	377.4			$	404.6			$	364.1
Backlog (units)			6,388				8,310				7,372
Average backlog price		$	412.4			$	442.0			$	394.2

Consolidated Homebuilding Revenues

     Homebuilding revenues for 2006 increased 17% from 2005, primarily as a result of a 10% increase in the number of homes settled and a 6% increase in the average settlement price. Each of these increases was driven by a higher backlog at the beginning of 2006 as compared to the beginning of 2005. Beginning backlog units and dollars were 13% and 26% higher, respectively year over year. Additionally, these increases in settlements were experienced year over year in each of our markets.

     Homebuilding revenues for 2005 increased 22% from 2004, primarily as a result of a 13% increase in the average settlement price and an 8% increase in the number of homes settled. Each of these increases was driven by a higher backlog, both in dollars and units, at the beginning of 2005 as compared to the beginning of 2004 due to the company’s overall growth and our ability to raise prices year over year during

a period of strong housing demand. We experienced increased home settlements year over year in each of our regions except Baltimore where settlements declined slightly from the prior year. Settlements in the Baltimore region were negatively affected by development delays throughout the first three quarters of 2005. The Baltimore region was able to resolve several of these development delays in the fourth quarter, and settlements for this region increased 24% in the fourth quarter of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

Consolidated Homebuilding New Orders

     The number of new orders for 2006 decreased 10% from 2005, and the value of new orders for 2006 decreased 16% to $4,988,137 from $5,928,815 in 2005. The decrease in new orders is attributable to lower sales absorption per community resulting from a more competitive sales environment in 2006 as compared to 2005. The average number of communities open during 2006 exceeded the number open during 2005 by 13%, while the average number of communities open during the fourth quarter of 2006 of 551 was down 6% from the same period in 2005. The decrease in the number of active communities in the fourth quarter is attributable to our ongoing review of our lot option deposit contracts, as discussed above, and the subsequent exiting from certain communities which were no longer profitable. In certain communities, we are seeking concessions from our developers to reduce lot purchase prices to current market values and/or to defer scheduled lot purchases. In communities where we are unsuccessful in negotiating necessary concessions, we may exit the community and forfeit our deposit.

     The number of new orders for 2005 increased 11% from 2004, and the value of new orders for 2005 increased 23% to $5,928,815 from $4,817,780 in 2004. The increase in the number of new orders was primarily attributable to an overall increase in the average number of active communities to 522 in 2005 as compared to 450 in 2004. Strong new order growth was experienced in each of our regions except the Washington, D.C. region, which remained relatively flat with the prior year. Sales in the Washington, D.C. region were negatively impacted by lower sales absorption during the second half of the year as compared to the same period in 2004 as a result of generally weaker market conditions within the region. The 23% increase in the value of new orders was attributable to both the aforementioned increase in the number of new orders and sustained housing demand year over year, which provided us the opportunity to raise selling prices, resulting in an 11% increase in the average selling price in 2005 as compared to 2004.

Consolidated Homebuilding Gross Profit

     Homebuilding gross profit margins declined to 22.1% in 2006 from 27.8% in 2005. Gross profit margins were negatively impacted by the aforementioned lower selling prices, contract land deposit impairment charges in 2006, and higher lot and certain commodity costs, excluding lumber. During 2006, we incurred contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $174,000. These impairments lowered gross profit margins by 288 basis points. In 2005, contract land deposit impairment charges totaled approximately $12,600. The contract land deposit write-downs in the fourth quarter of 2006 totaled approximately $60,000, compared to $4,900 during the same period in 2005, contributing to the decline in the fourth quarter gross profit margins to 19.0% in 2006 from 27.6% in the fourth quarter of 2005. We expect that due to the reduction in average selling prices experienced in 2006 and the continuing uncertainty in many of the markets in which we operate, gross profit margins may be further negatively impacted in future periods.

     The increase in gross profit margins of 210 basis points in 2005 from 2004 was primarily attributable to an increase in average settlement prices year over year. These increases were partially offset by higher land and certain commodity prices in 2005 as compared to 2004. Many of the end product building supplies used in our construction operations were impacted by higher, more volatile energy and petroleum costs, including: OSB sheathing; siding material; PVC piping, paint; asphalt; shingles; cement; gypsum; steel; glass and insulation.

Consolidated Homebuilding Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)

     SG&A expense increased $86,794, or 25%, year over year and as a percentage of revenue increased to 7.2% in 2006 from 6.7% in 2005. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily attributable to the implementation of SFAS 123R in 2006, as a result of which, we recognized approximately $53,000 in SG&A compensation costs related to outstanding stock options. We incurred no compensation costs for outstanding stock options in 2005. Additionally, SG&A costs were higher as a result of an approximate $29,500 increase in marketing costs attributable to the aforementioned increase in the average number of active communities in 2006 as compared to 2005 and to increased marketing efforts required to compete in an increasingly competitive market.

     SG&A for 2005 increased $84,630, or 32% from 2004, and as a percentage of revenues, increased to 6.7% in 2005 from 6.1% in 2004. The increase in SG&A costs was primarily attributable to increases in personnel costs and selling and marketing costs of approximately $43,400 and $26,500, respectively. Personnel costs increased primarily as a result of increased wages and management incentive compensation due to increased staffing levels to support our growth in 2005. As of December 31, 2005, SG&A staffing levels had increased approximately 23% from December 31, 2004. The increase in selling and marketing costs were attributable to an increase in advertising and selling support costs due to the aforementioned increase in the average number of active communities year over year.

Consolidated Homebuilding Backlog

     Backlog units and dollars were 6,388 and $2,634,720, respectively, at December 31, 2006 compared to backlog units of 8,310 and dollars of $3,673,221 at December 31, 2005. The decrease in backlog units was due primarily to a 17% decrease in the number of new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the same period ended December 31, 2005, coupled with a 10% increase in the number of homes settled in 2006 as compared to 2005. The 28% decrease in backlog dollars was attributable to the 23% decrease in backlog units and a 10% decrease in the average price of new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005.

     Backlog units and dollars were 8,310 and $3,673,221, respectively, at December 31, 2005 compared to backlog units of 7,372 and dollars of $2,906,041 at December 31, 2004. The increase in backlog units was due primarily to a 10% increase in the number of new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2005 as compared to the same period ended December 31, 2004. The 26% increase in backlog dollars was attributable to the 13% increase in backlog units and a 7% increase in the average price of new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

Reportable Homebuilding Segments

     Homebuilding profit before tax includes all revenues and income generated from the sale of homes, less the cost of homes sold, selling, general and administrative expenses, and a corporate capital allocation charge. The corporate capital allocation charge eliminates in consolidation, is based on the segment’s average net assets employed, and is charged using a consistent methodology in the years presented. The corporate capital allocation charged to the operating segment allows the Chief Operating Decision Maker to determine whether the operating segment’s results are providing the desired rate of return after covering our cost of capital. We record charges on contract land deposits when we determine that it is probable that recovery of the deposit is impaired. For segment reporting purposes, impairments on contract land deposits are generally charged to the operating segment upon the determination to terminate a finished lot purchase agreement with the developer.

     The following tables summarize homebuilding settlements, new orders, backlog and operating activity by reportable segment for each of the last three years:

		Year Ended December 31,
		2006				2005				2004
Mid Atlantic:
Revenues		$	3,825,960			$	3,235,053			$	2,623,308
Settlements (units)			7,491				6,735				6,462
Average settlement price		$	510.4			$	479.9			$	405.3
New Orders (units)			6,182				7,327				6,696
Average new order price		$	479.6			$	526.9			$	459.8
Backlog (units)			3,665				4,974				4,382
Average backlog price		$	499.7			$	541.0			$	470.5
Gross profit margin		$	979,362			$	1,096,565			$	795,491
Gross profit margin percentage			25.60	%			33.90	%			30.32	%
Segment profit		$	687,904			$	863,210			$	623,040
North East:
Revenues		$	657,338			$	533,662			$	466,206
Settlements (units)			1,682				1,390				1,388
Average settlement price		$	390.7			$	383.9			$	335.9
New Orders (units)			1,438				1,459				1,360
Average new order price		$	371.4			$	400.1			$	351.8
Backlog (units)			540				784				715
Average backlog price		$	359.6			$	404.7			$	373.4
Gross profit margin		$	120,531			$	114,365			$	98,291
Gross profit margin percentage			18.34	%			21.43	%			21.08	%
Segment profit		$	64,246			$	66,944			$	64,130
Mid East:
Revenues		$	965,626			$	944,070			$	793,976
Settlements (units)			3,571				3,404				3,049
Average settlement price		$	268.8			$	275.6			$	258.1
New Orders (units)			3,244				3,544				3,154
Average new order price		$	267.7			$	274.2			$	268.6
Backlog (units)			1,274				1,601				1,461
Average backlog price		$	270.6			$	271.5			$	275.6
Gross profit margin		$	160,494			$	178,114			$	153,197
Gross profit margin percentage			16.62	%			18.87	%			19.29	%
Segment profit		$	69,911			$	95,190			$	87,272
South East:
Revenues		$	587,312			$	464,958			$	364,013
Settlements (units)			2,395				2,258				1,850
Average settlement price		$	245.2			$	205.9			$	196.6
New Orders (units)			2,353				2,323				2,021
Average new order price		$	263.9			$	220.6			$	204.3
Backlog (units)			909				951				814
Average backlog price		$	290.7			$	242.4			$	214.7
Gross profit margin		$	129,127			$	92,348			$	70,314
Gross profit margin percentage			21.99	%			19.86	%			19.32	%
Segment profit		$	79,948			$	52,199			$	36,958

Mid Atlantic

2006 versus 2005

     The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $175,000 decrease in segment profit year over year. Revenues increased 18% as a result of an 11% increase in the number of units settled and a 6% increase in the average settlement price. We experienced increased home settlements year over year in each of the markets within the Mid Atlantic segment. Settlements were up 25% in the Baltimore region from the prior year as several of the development delays experienced in 2005 were resolved. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage declined in 2006 to 25.6% from 33.9% in 2005 as a result of the current market conditions which resulted in the write-off of $126,000 in contract land deposits for the year and higher lot and certain other commodity costs. Segment profits were also negatively impacted by an increase in SG&A expenses of approximately $34,300, primarily as a result of a $27,200 increase in selling and marketing costs. The increase in selling and marketing costs is attributable to a 15% increase in the average number of active communities to 277 in 2006 from 240 in 2005 in addition to increased marketing efforts required to compete in an increasingly competitive market. In addition, G&A personnel costs were higher by $4,800 year over year.

     Segment new orders were down 16% in 2006 from 2005 and the average selling price declined by 9%. New orders in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD regions declined 23% and 16%, respectively. These declines were primarily the result of an increasingly competitive selling environment driven by affordability issues, declining homebuyer confidence and higher levels of new and existing home inventories. New orders within the segment were also negatively impacted by the increase in cancellations. Cancellation rates for the Mid Atlantic segment increased to 23% in 2006 from 12% in 2005, with the highest cancellation rates occurring in the Washington, D.C. region where the cancellation rates increased to 29% in 2006 from 14% in 2005. Backlog units and dollars were down 26% and 32%, respectively, at December 31 2006 from the same period in 2005. The decrease in backlog units was driven primarily by the aforementioned decrease in new orders, coupled with the 11% increase in settlements year over year. The decrease in backlog dollars is due primarily to the decrease in backlog units and additionally, to a 15% decrease in the average selling price for new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005.

2005 versus 2004

     The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $240,000 increase in segment profit year over year. Revenues increased 23% as a result of a 4% increase in the number of units settled and an 18% increase in the average settlement price. We experienced increased home settlements year over year in each of our regions except Baltimore where settlements declined slightly from the prior year. Settlements in the Baltimore region were negatively affected by development delays throughout the first three quarters of 2005. The Baltimore region was able to resolve several of these development delays in the fourth quarter, and settlements for this region increased 24% in the fourth quarter of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage grew to 33.9% in 2005 from 30.3% in 2004. The gross profit margin increase was due to favorable market conditions generated from strong housing demand within the segment’s markets during 2005, particularly in the Washington, D.C. region. Segment profits were negatively affected by an approximate $34,000 increase in selling, general and administrative costs due to a 24% increase in the number of communities open for sale during 2005 as compared to 2004 and higher wage and other costs to support our growth strategy. Backlog units and dollars were 14% and 31% higher, respectively, than the 2004 year, principally due to the comparative increases in new orders of 9% and average selling price of 15%.

North East

2006 versus 2005

     The North East segment had an approximate $2,700 decrease in segment profit year over year, while

revenues for the same periods increased 23%, or approximately $123,700. Revenues increased primarily as a result of a 21% increase in the number of units settled. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage decreased to 18.3% in 2006 from 21.4% in 2005. Segment gross profit margins were negatively impacted by contract land deposit write-offs totaling approximately $10,000 in 2006, higher lot and certain other commodity costs. Segment profits were also negatively impacted by an approximate $3,100 increase in selling and marketing costs attributable to a 29% increase in the average number of active communities open for sale during 2006 as compared to 2005. New orders remained flat from the prior year, while the average selling price for new orders decreased 7% as a result of a more competitive selling environment within the segment. Backlog units and dollars declined 31% and 39%, respectively, as a result of the increase in homes settled, coupled with a 14% decline in new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005.

2005 versus 2004

     The North East segment had an approximate $3,000 increase in segment profit year over year. Revenues increased 15% primarily as a result of a 14% increase in the average settlement price. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage was essentially flat at 21.4% in 2005 from 21.1% in 2004. Segment profits were negatively affected by an approximate $5,200 increase in selling and marketing costs due to an 18% increase in the number of communities open for sale during 2005 as compared to 2004. Backlog units and dollars increased 10% and 19%, respectively. The unit increase is primarily due to a 7% increase in the number of new orders in 2005 compared to 2004, and the dollar increase is due to the unit increase and to a 14% increase in the average selling price.

Mid East

2006 versus 2005

     The Mid East segment had an approximate $25,300 decrease in segment profit year over year. Revenues for the segment increased 2%, or approximately $21,600, due to a 5% increase in units settled year over year. Segment gross profit margin percentage declined to 16.6% in 2006 from 18.9% in 2005. Gross profit margins were negatively impacted by an approximate $10,000 write-off of contract land deposits in 2006. Segment profits were further negatively impacted by an increase of approximately $7,300 in selling, general and administrative costs. Selling and marketing costs increased approximately $3,400 in 2006 as a result of an 11% increase in the number of active communities open for sale in 2006 as compared to 2005. General and administrative costs increased primarily as a result of a $3,000 increase in wages year over year. New orders were down 9% for the year. This decline coupled with the aforementioned increase in settlements year over year resulted in a decrease in backlog units and dollars as of December 31, 2006 of 20% and 21%, respectively, as compared to the same period in 2005.

2005 versus 2004

     The Mid East segment had an approximate $8,000 increase in segment profit year over year. Revenues increased 19% as a result of a 12% increase in the number of units settled and a 7% increase in the average settlement price. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage was essentially flat at 18.9% in 2005 from 19.3% in 2004. Segment profits were negatively affected by an approximate $13,000 increase in selling, general and administrative costs due to a 13% increase in the number of communities open for sale during 2005 as compared to 2004, and higher wages due to increased staffing levels to support our growth strategy. Backlog units and dollars increased 10% and 8%, respectively. The increases are primarily attributable to a 12% increase in the number of new orders in 2005 compared to 2004.

South East

2006 versus 2005

     The South East segment had an approximate $27,700 increase in segment profit year over year. Revenues for the segment increased approximately $122,400, or 26%, as a result of a 19% increase in the average settlement price and a 6% increase in the number of units settled. Gross profit margin percentage for the segment increased to 22.0% in 2006 from 19.9% in 2005. The improved profit margins resulted primarily from favorable market conditions, which provided us the opportunity to increase prices within each of our markets within the segment. Backlog units were down 4% year over year due to the increase in the number of units settled coupled with a 3% decline in new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006 as compared to new orders for the same period of 2005. Backlog dollars increased 15% as the 4% decline in backlog units was offset by a 19% increase in the average sales price of new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005.

2005 versus 2004

     The South East segment had an approximate $15,000 increase in segment profit year over year. Revenues increased 28% as a result of a 22% increase in the number of units settled and a 5% increase in the average settlement price. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage was 19.9% in 2005 and 19.3% in 2004. The gross profit margin increase was due to favorable market conditions that provided us the opportunity to increase prices in certain of the segment’s markets. Segment profits were negatively affected by an approximate $5,300 increase in selling, general and administrative costs due to higher wages from increased staffing levels to support our growth strategy. Backlog units and dollars were 17% and 32% higher, respectively, than the 2004 year, principally due to the comparative increases in new orders of 15% and average selling price of 8%.

Homebuilding Segment Reconciliations to Consolidated Homebuilding Operations

     In addition to the corporate capital allocation and contract land deposit impairments discussed above, the other reconciling items between homebuilding segment profit and homebuilding consolidated profit before tax include unallocated corporate overhead (which includes all management incentive compensation), consolidation adjustments and external corporate interest expense. Our overhead functions, such as accounting, treasury, human resources, land acquisition, etc., are centrally performed and the costs are not allocated to the Company’s operating segments. Consolidation adjustments consist of such items to convert the reportable segments’ results, which are predominantly maintained on a cash basis, to a full accrual basis for external financial statement presentation purposes, and are not allocated to the Company’s operating segments. External corporate interest expense is primarily comprised of interest charges on the Company’s outstanding senior notes and working capital line borrowings, and are not charged to the operating segments because the charges are included in the corporate capital allocation discussed above.

		Year Ended December 31,
		2006				2005				2004
Homebuilding Consolidated Gross Profit:
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic		$	979,362			$	1,096,565			$	795,491
Homebuilding North East			120,531				114,365				98,291
Homebuilding Mid East			160,494				178,114				153,197
Homebuilding South East			129,127				92,348				70,314
Consolidation adjustments and other (1)			(54,543	)			(41,679	)			(26,076	)
Consolidated homebuilding gross profit		$	1,334,971			$	1,439,713			$	1,091,217
Homebuilding Consolidated Profit Before Tax:
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic		$	687,904			$	863,210			$	623,040
Homebuilding North East			64,246				66,944				64,130
Homebuilding Mid East			69,911				95,190				87,272
Homebuilding South East			79,948				52,199				36,958
Reconciling items:
Contract land deposit impairments			(27,717	)			(9,950	)			(6,000	)
Stock option expense (2)			(54,514	)			—				—
Corporate capital allocation (3)			184,908				149,247				110,769
Unallocated corporate overhead (4)			(86,363	)			(105,364	)			(80,635	)
Consolidation adjustments and other			(3,340	)			(11,670	)			(3,168	)
Corporate interest expense			(17,145	)			(13,126	)			(11,223	)
Reconciling items sub-total			(4,171	)			9,137				9,743
Homebuilding consolidated profit before taxes		$	897,838			$	1,086,680			$	821,143

		Year Ended December 31,
		2006				2005				2004
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic		$	131,823			$	101,794			$	73,755
Homebuilding North East			19,533				15,904				11,518
Homebuilding Mid East			21,235				21,126				16,698
Homebuilding South East			12,317				10,423				8,798
Total		$	184,908			$	149,247			$	110,769

Mortgage Banking Segment

     We conduct our mortgage banking activity through NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (“NVRM”), a wholly owned subsidiary. NVRM focuses almost exclusively on serving the homebuilding segment’s customer base. Following is a table of financial and statistical data for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:

		2006				2005				2004
Loan closing volume:
Total principal		$	3,918,206			$	3,388,118			$	2,716,630
Segment income:		$	68,753			$	57,739			$	50,862
Capture rate:		$	86	%			87	%			84	%
Mortgage Banking Fees:
Net gain on sale of loans		$	72,700			$	62,279			$	52,858
Title services			24,081				21,072				18,353
Servicing fees			1,107				1,253				1,008
		$	97,888			$	84,604			$	72,219

     Loan closing volume for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased 16% from 2005. The 2006 increase was primarily attributable to a 7% increase in the average loan amount, and a year over year 8% increase in the number of units closed. The increase in the average loan amount reflects the aforementioned increase in the homebuilding segment’s average settlement prices. The unit increase for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflects an increase in the number of settlements by the homebuilding segment offset slightly by a 1% decrease in the percentage of loans closed for NVR’s homebuyers who obtain a mortgage to purchase the home (“Capture Rate”).

     Segment income for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased approximately $11,000 from 2005. The increase was primarily due to an increase in mortgage banking fees attributable to the aforementioned increase in closed loan volume and the product mix shift towards fixed rate mortgages. The increase to mortgage banking fees was net of an approximate $2,600 increase in costs during 2006 related to the contractual repayment of loan sale income to investors for loans that were paid in full within a set number of days following the sale of the loan.

     Traditionally, fixed rate mortgages have been generally more profitable than adjustable rate mortgages. In the second half of 2005, with the change in interest rates, the rate differential between fixed rate and adjustable rate mortgages narrowed. As a result, we saw a shift to these more profitable products, which remained favorable throughout 2006. We expect this favorable mix to continue into 2007.

     The increase to segment income was net of an approximate $3,800 increase in general and administrative expense in 2006. This was partially attributable to an increase in salary expense related to a 6% increase in the average employee count during the year and an 18% increase in office costs related to an increase in the number of branch offices in 2006. The additional staffing and branch offices were added to accommodate the planned increase in builder settlement volume and to improve customer service. The increase in general and administrative expense in 2006 was also due to an approximate $2,800 increase to the loan loss reserve based on an anticipated increase in mortgage repurchases based on contractual obligations to investors to repurchase sold loans that go into default within a set period of time after the loan is sold.

     Loan closing volume for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased 25% from 2004. The 2005 increase is primarily attributable to a 15% increase in the average loan amount, and a year over year 9% increase in the number of units closed. The increase in the average loan amount reflects the aforementioned increase in the homebuilding segment’s average selling prices. The unit increase for the year ended December 31, 2005 reflects an increase in the number of settlements by the homebuilding segment and a slight increase in the Capture Rate.

     Segment income for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased approximately $6,900 from 2004. The increase was primarily due to an increase in mortgage banking fees attributable to the aforementioned increase in closed loan volume. This was net of an approximate $6,000 increase in general and administrative expense during 2005. The increase in general and administrative expense was primarily due to an increase in salaries and other personnel costs due to a 26% increase in the total number of NVRM employees in 2005 versus 2004. The additional staffing was to position NVRM for future growth and to increase capture rate.

Seasonality

     Overall, we do not experience material seasonal fluctuations in sales, settlements or loan closings.

Effective Tax Rate

     Our consolidated effective tax rates were 39.0%, 39.0%, and 40.0% in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The lower effective tax rates in 2006 and 2005 is primarily due to the favorable tax impact of the new Internal Revenue Code Section 199 domestic manufacturing deduction established by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

     In January 2007, the United States Congress began consideration of a bill that would amend Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The bill may change the definition of “covered employee” as it pertains to distributions received from deferred compensation plans after separation of service. If this bill is passed in its current form and subsequently signed into law, we would be required to write-off approximately $27,000 of deferred tax assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006. The write-off would occur in the period that the bill is passed. We can provide no assurance on the outcome of this matter — See Risk Factors in Item 1 A.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Pending Adoption

     In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2007. We do not expect that the adoption of FIN 48 will have a material effect on our financial results.

     In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets,” which provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting by allowing us the option to carry mortgage servicing rights at fair value. This new Statement amends SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities—a replacement of FASB SFAS No. 125,” with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is effective for all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted in certain circumstances. Because we do not retain the servicing rights when we sell our mortgage loans held for sale, the adoption of SFAS No. 156 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

     In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. We are currently reviewing the effect SFAS 157 will have on our financial statements upon adoption.

     In November 2006, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 06-8, “Applicability of the Assessment of a Buyer’s Continuing Investment Under FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, for Sales of Condominiums.” EITF 06-8 states that the adequacy of the buyer’s continuing investment under SFAS 66 should be assessed in determining whether to recognize profit under the percentage-of-completion method on the sale of individual units in a condominium project. This consensus could require that additional deposits be collected by developers of condominium projects that wish to recognize profit during the construction period under the percentage-of-completion method. EITF 06-8 is effective for us January 1, 2008. We do not expect that the adoption of EITF 06-8 will have a material impact on our financial statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Lines of Credit and Notes Payable

     Our homebuilding segment generally provides for its working capital cash requirements using cash generated from operations and a short-term unsecured working capital revolving credit facility (the “Facility”). During 2006, we increased the available borrowings under the Facility to $600,000 from $400,000. The Facility’s available borrowings are subject to certain borrowing base limitations. The Facility expires in December 2010 and outstanding amounts bear interest at either (i) the prime rate or (ii) London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus applicable margin as defined within the Facility. The weighted-average interest rate for the amounts outstanding under the Facility was 5.9% in 2006. Up to $150,000 of the Facility is currently available for issuance in the form of letters of credit, of which $22,320 was outstanding at December 31, 2006. The Facility contains various affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants include among others, certain limitations on transactions involving the creation of guarantees, sale of assets, acquisitions, mergers, investments and land purchases. Additional covenants include (i) a minimum adjusted consolidated tangible net worth requirement, (ii) a maximum leverage ratio requirement, and (iii) an interest coverage ratio requirement. These covenants restrict the amount that we would be able to pay in dividends each year. We are also subject to borrowing base restrictions if our senior debt rating falls below investment grade. At December 31, 2006 we were in compliance with all covenants under the Facility and there were no borrowing base limitations reducing the amount available to us for borrowings. At December 31, 2006, we had no direct borrowings outstanding under the Facility.

     NVR’s mortgage banking segment provides for its mortgage origination and other operating activities using cash generated from operations as well as various short-term credit facilities. NVRM has available an annually renewable mortgage warehouse facility (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”) with an aggregate borrowing limit of $175,000. The Revolving Credit Agreement is used to fund NVRM’s mortgage origination activities, under which $153,552 was outstanding at December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2006, there were no borrowing base limitations reducing the amount available to NVRM for borrowing. The Revolving Credit Agreement expires in August 2007. The interest rate under the Revolving Credit Agreement is either: (i) LIBOR plus 1.0%, or (ii) 1.125% to the extent that NVRM provides compensating balances. The weighted average interest rate for amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Agreement was 5.0% during 2006. NVRM’s mortgage warehouse facility limits the ability of NVRM to transfer funds to NVR in the form of dividends, loans or advances. In addition, NVRM is required to maintain a minimum net worth of $14,000.

     On January 20, 1998, we filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the issuance of up to $400,000 of debt securities (the “1998 Shelf Registration”). The 1998 Shelf Registration statement was declared effective on February 27, 1998 and provides that securities may be offered from time to time in one or more series, and in the form of senior or subordinated debt.

     On June 17, 2003, we completed an offering, at par, for $200,000 of 5% Senior Notes due 2010 (the “Notes”) under the 1998 Shelf Registration. The Notes mature on June 15, 2010 and bear interest at 5%, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15, commencing on December 15, 2003. The

Notes are general unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness and indebtedness under our working capital credit facility. The Notes are senior in right of payment to any future subordinated indebtedness that we may incur. We may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at any time upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days notice at a redemption price equal to the greater of (a) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, or (b) the discounted present value of the remaining scheduled payments of the Notes to be redeemed, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest. Upon completion of the 2003 Notes offering, we had $55,000 remaining available for issuance under the 1998 Shelf Registration.

     On May 27, 2004, we filed a shelf registration statement (the “2004 Shelf Registration”) with the SEC to register up to $1,000,000 for future offer and sale of debt securities, common shares, preferred shares, depositary shares representing preferred shares and warrants. The SEC declared the 2004 Shelf Registration effective on June 15, 2004. NVR expects to use the proceeds received from future offerings issued under the 2004 Shelf Registration and the 1998 Shelf Registration for general corporate purposes. This discussion of our shelf registration capacity does not constitute an offer of any securities for sale.

Equity Repurchases

     In addition to funding growth in our homebuilding and mortgage banking operations, we historically have used a substantial portion of our excess liquidity to repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock in open market and privately negotiated transactions. This ongoing repurchase activity is conducted pursuant to publicly announced Board authorizations, and is typically executed in accordance with the safe-harbor provisions of Rule 10(b)-18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The repurchase program assists us in accomplishing our primary objective, creating increases in shareholder value. See Part II, Item 5 of the Form 10-K for disclosure of amounts repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2006. For the year ended December 31, 2006, we repurchased approximately 481,000 shares of our common stock at an aggregate purchase price of $287,064.

Cash Flows

     As shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, our operating activities provided cash of $682,963. Cash was provided primarily by homebuilding operations and a reduction in our homebuilding inventories of approximately $60,000 due to a reduction in the number of homes under construction at the end of 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005. The presentation of operating cash flows was reduced by approximately $96,000, which is the amount of the excess tax benefit realized from the exercise of stock options during the period and credited directly to additional paid in capital. As required by SFAS 123R, which we adopted effective January 1, 2006, excess tax benefits credited directly to additional-paid-in capital resulting from stock-based compensation must be presented as an operating cash outflow and a financing cash inflow.

     Net cash used for investing activities was $22,598 for the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily as a result of approximately $23,000 in property and equipment purchases throughout the period.

     Net cash used for financing activities was $281,772 for the year ended December 31, 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we repurchased approximately 481,000 shares of our common stock at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $287,000 under our ongoing common stock repurchase program, discussed in the Equity Repurchases section above. We also reduced net borrowings under the working capital and mortgage warehouse facilities by approximately $107,000. The presentation of financing cash flows was favorably impacted by the realization of approximately $96,000 in excess income tax benefits from the exercise of stock options, which pursuant to SFAS 123R, must be reported as a financing cash inflow.

     At December 31, 2006, the homebuilding segment had restricted cash of $3,464, which relates to customer deposits on certain home sales.

     We believe that cash generated from operations and borrowings available under our credit facilities and the public debt markets will be sufficient to satisfy near and long term cash requirements for working capital and debt service in both our homebuilding and mortgage banking operations.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Lot Acquisition Strategy

     We do not engage in the land development business. Instead, we acquire finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under fixed price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage, typically ranging up to 10%, of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots.

     We believe that our lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and land development. We may, at our option, choose for any reason and at any time not to perform under these purchase agreements by delivering notice of our intent not to acquire the finished lots under contract. Our sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under these purchase agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidating damage provision contained within the purchase agreements. We do not have any financial guarantees or completion obligations and we do not guarantee specific performance under these purchase agreements.

     At December 31, 2006, we controlled approximately 88,500 lots with an aggregate purchase price of approximately $9,000,000, by making or committing to make deposits of approximately $632,000 in the form of cash and letters of credit. Our entire risk of loss pertaining to the aggregate $9,000,000 contractual commitment resulting from our non-performance under the contracts is limited to the $498,000 deposit amount, plus the additional $134,000 deposits referred to below. Of the $632,000 deposit total, approximately $484,000 in cash and approximately $14,000 in letters of credit have been issued as of December 31, 2006 and subsequent to December 31, 2006, we will pay $134,000 in additional deposits assuming that contractual development milestones are met by the developers (see Contractual Obligations section below). Please refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of our lot acquisition strategy in relation to our accounting under FIN 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.

Bonds and Letters of Credit

     We enter into bond or letter of credit arrangements with local municipalities, government agencies, or land developers to collateralize our obligations under various contracts. We had $35,985 of contingent obligations under such agreements as of December 31, 2006 (inclusive of the $14,000 of lot acquisition deposits in the form of letters of credit discussed above). We believe we will fulfill our obligations under the related contracts and do not anticipate any material losses under these bonds or letters of credit.

Mortgage Commitments and Forward Sales

     In the normal course of business, our mortgage banking segment enters into contractual commitments to extend credit to buyers of single-family homes with fixed expiration dates. The commitments become effective when the borrowers “lock-in” a specified interest rate within time frames established by us. All mortgagors are evaluated for credit worthiness prior to the extension of the commitment. To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, we enter into optional or mandatory delivery forward sale contracts to sell whole loans and mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers. The forward sale contracts lock in an interest rate and price for the sale of loans similar to the specific rate lock commitments classified as derivatives. Both the rate lock commitments to borrowers and the forward sale contracts to broker/dealers are undesignated derivatives, and, accordingly, are marked to market through earnings. At December 31, 2006, there were contractual commitments to extend credit to borrowers aggregating approximately $175,000, and open forward delivery sale contracts aggregating approximately $338,000.

Contractual Obligations

     Our fixed, non-cancelable obligations as of December 31, 2006, were as follows:

		Payments due by period
						Less than				1—3				3—5				More than
		Total				1 year				years				years				5 years
Debt (a)		$	388,552			$	163,552			$	20,000			$	205,000			$	—
Capital leases (b)			5,082				529				1,251				1,289				2,013
Operating leases (c)			114,127				27,695				37,184				19,165				30,083
Purchase obligations (d)			134,000				*				*				*				*
Executive officer employment contracts (e)			11,060				1,640				6,280				3,140				—
Other long-term liabilities (f)			42,787				37,920				4,867				—				—
Total		$	695,608			$	231,336			$	69,582			$	228,594			$	32,096

Critical Accounting Policies

     General

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We continually evaluate the estimates we use to prepare the consolidated financial statements, and update those estimates as necessary. In general, our estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and other various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates made by management.

     Variable Interest Entities

     Revised Financial Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46R”), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities requires the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity to consolidate that entity on its financial statements. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the party that absorbs a majority of the variable interest entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual, or other financial interests in the entity. Expected losses are the expected negative variability in the fair value of an entity’s net assets exclusive of its variable interests, and expected residual returns are the expected positive variability in the fair value of an entity’s net assets, exclusive of its variable interests.

     Forward contracts, such as the fixed price purchase agreements utilized by us to acquire finished lot inventory, are deemed to be variable interests under FIN 46R. Therefore, the development entities with which we enter fixed price purchase agreements are examined under FIN 46R for possible consolidation by us, including certain joint venture limited liability corporations (“LLC’s”) utilized by us to acquire finished lots on a limited basis. We have developed a methodology to determine whether we, or, conversely, the owner(s) of the applicable development entity, are the primary beneficiary of a development entity. The methodology used to evaluate our primary beneficiary status requires substantial management judgment and estimates. These judgments and estimates involve assigning probabilities to various estimated cash flow possibilities relative to the development entity’s expected profits and losses and the cash flows associated with changes in the fair value of finished lots under contract. Although we believe that our accounting policy is designed to properly assess our primary beneficiary status relative to our involvement with the development entities from which we acquire finished lots, changes to the probabilities and the cash flow possibilities used in our evaluation could produce widely different conclusions regarding whether we are or are not a development entity’s primary beneficiary, possibly resulting in additional, or fewer, development entities being consolidated on our financial statements.

     Homebuilding Inventory

     The carrying value of inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost of lots and completed and uncompleted housing units represent the accumulated actual cost of the units. Field construction supervisors’ salaries and related direct overhead expenses are included in inventory costs. Interest costs are not capitalized into inventory. Upon settlement, the cost of the unit is expensed on a specific identification basis. Cost of manufacturing materials is determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Recoverability and impairment, if any, is primarily evaluated by analyzing sales of comparable assets. We believe that our accounting policy is designed to properly assess the carrying value of homebuilding inventory.

     Contract Land Deposits

     We purchase finished lots under fixed price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the contract. The deposits are in the form of cash or letters of credit in

varying amounts and represent a percentage of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. We maintain an allowance for losses on contract land deposits that we believe is sufficient to provide for losses in the existing contract land deposit portfolio. The allowance reflects our judgment of the present loss exposure at the end of the reporting period, considering market and economic conditions, sales absorption and profitability within specific communities and terms of the various contracts. Although we consider the allowance for losses on contract land deposits reflected on the December 31, 2006 balance sheet to be adequate (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements), there can be no assurance that this allowance will prove to be adequate over time to cover losses due to unanticipated adverse changes in the economy or other events adversely affecting specific markets or the homebuilding industry.

     Intangible Assets

     Reorganization value in excess of identifiable assets (“excess reorganization value”), goodwill, and indefinite life intangible assets are not subject to amortization under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”). Rather, excess reorganization value, goodwill, and other intangible assets are subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test. We continually evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate that the remaining value of excess reorganization value, goodwill, and other intangible assets may not be recoverable. We completed the annual assessment of impairment during the first quarter of 2006, and as of December 31, 2006, we believe that excess reorganization value, goodwill, and other intangible assets were not impaired. This conclusion is based on management’s judgment, considering such factors as our history of operating success, our well-recognized brand names, and the significant positions held in the markets in which we operate. However, changes in strategy or adverse changes in market conditions could impact this judgment and require an impairment loss to be recognized for the amount that the carrying value of excess reorganization value, goodwill, and/or other intangible assets exceeds their fair value.

     Warranty/Product Liability Accruals

     Warranty and product liability accruals are established to provide for estimated future costs as a result of construction and product defects, product recalls and litigation incidental to our business. Liability estimates are determined based on our judgment considering such factors as historical experience, the likely current cost of corrective action, manufacturers’ and subcontractors’ participation in sharing the cost of corrective action, consultations with third party experts such as engineers, and evaluations by our General Counsel and other outside counsel retained to handle specific product liability cases. Although we consider the warranty and product liability accrual reflected on the December 31, 2006 balance sheet (see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements) to be adequate, there can be no assurance that this accrual will prove to be adequate over time to cover losses due to increased costs for material and labor, the inability or refusal of manufacturers or subcontractors to financially participate in corrective action, unanticipated adverse legal settlements, or other unanticipated changes to the assumptions used to estimate the warranty and product liability accrual.

     Stock Option Expense

     Beginning in 2006 with our adoption of SFAS 123R, we are required to recognize within our income statement compensation costs related to our stock based compensation plans. The costs recognized are based on the grant-date fair value. Compensation cost for “service-only” option grants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award (from the date of grant through the period of the last separately vesting portion of the grant). Compensation cost for “performance condition” option grants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance, multiple awards (graded vesting attribution method).

     We calculate the fair value of our non-publicly traded, employee stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. While the Black-Scholes model is a widely accepted method to calculate the fair value of options, its results are dependent on input variables, two of which, expected term and expected volatility, are significantly dependent on management’s judgment. We have concluded that our historical exercise experience is the best estimate of future exercise patterns to determine an option’s expected term. To estimate expected

volatility, we analyze the historic volatility of our common stock. Changes in management’s judgment of the expected term and the expected volatility could have a material effect on the grant-date fair value calculated and expensed within the income statement. In addition, we are required to estimate future option forfeitures when considering the amount of stock-based compensation costs to record. We have concluded that our historical forfeiture rate is the best measure to estimate future forfeitures of granted stock options. However, there can be no assurance that our future forfeiture rate will not be materially higher or lower than our historical forfeiture rate, which would affect the aggregate cumulative compensation expense recognized. Further, although we believe that the compensation costs recognized during the year ended December 31, 2006 are representative of the ratable amortization of the grant-date fair value of unvested options outstanding and expected to be exercised, changes to the estimated input values such as expected term and expected volatility could produce widely different fair values. See Notes 1 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information on our adoption of SFAS 123R.

Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices and Economic Conditions

     See Risk Factors included in Item 1A herein.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

     Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our market risk arises from interest rate risk inherent in our financial instruments. Interest rate risk is the possibility that changes in interest rates will cause unfavorable changes in net income or in the value of interest rate-sensitive assets, liabilities and commitments. Lower interest rates tend to increase demand for mortgage loans for home purchasers, while higher interest rates make it more difficult for potential borrowers to purchase residential properties and to qualify for mortgage loans. We have no market rate sensitive instruments held for speculative or trading purposes.

     Our mortgage banking segment is exposed to interest rate risk as it relates to its lending activities. The mortgage banking segment originates mortgage loans, which are either sold through optional or mandatory forward delivery contracts into the secondary markets. All of the mortgage banking segment’s loan portfolio is held for sale and subject to forward sale commitments. NVRM also sells all of its mortgage servicing rights on a servicing released basis.

     Our homebuilding segment generates operating liquidity and acquires capital assets through fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. The homebuilding segment’s primary debt is a variable-rate working capital revolving credit facility that currently provides for unsecured borrowings up to $600,000, subject to certain borrowing base limitations. The Facility expires in December 2010 and outstanding amounts bear interest at either (i) the prime rate or (ii) LIBOR plus applicable margin as defined within the Facility. The weighted-average interest rate for the amounts outstanding under the Facility was 5.9% in 2006.

     NVRM generates operating liquidity primarily through the mortgage warehouse facility, which had a borrowing limit of $175,000 at December 31, 2006. The mortgage warehouse facility is used to fund its mortgage origination activities. The interest rate under the mortgage warehouse facility is either: (i) LIBOR plus 1.0%, or (ii) 1.125% to the extent that NVRM provides compensating balances. The weighted-average interest rate for amounts outstanding under the mortgage warehouse facility was 5.0% during 2006.

     The following table represents the contractual balances of our on-balance sheet financial instruments in dollars at the expected maturity dates, as well as the fair values of those on-balance sheet financial instruments at December 31, 2006. The expected maturity categories take into consideration the actual and anticipated amortization of principal and does not take into consideration the reinvestment of cash or the refinancing of existing indebtedness. Because we sell all of the mortgage loans we originate into the secondary markets, we have made the assumption that the portfolio of mortgage loans held for sale will mature in the first year. Consequently, outstanding warehouse borrowings and repurchase facilities are also assumed to mature in the first year.

Maturities (000’s)

																														Fair
		2007				2008				2009				2010				2011				Thereafter				Total				Value
Mortgage banking segment
Interest rate sensitive assets:
Mortgage loans held for sale		$	178,360				—				—				—				—				—			$	178,360			$	178,119
Average interest rate			6.6	%			—				—				—				—				—				6.6	%
Interest rate sensitive liabilities:
Variable rate warehouse line of credit		$	153,552				—				—				—				—				—			$	153,552			$	153,552
Average interest rate (a)			4.9	%			—				—				—				—				—				4.9	%
Other:
Forward trades of mortgage-backed securities (b)		$	450				—				—				—				—				—			$	450			$	450
Forward loan commitments (b)			(125	)			—				—				—				—				—				(125	)			(125	)
Homebuilding segment
Interest rate sensitive assets:
Interest-bearing deposits		$	460,182				—				—				—				—				—			$	460,182			$	460,182
Average interest rate			5.0	%			—				—				—				—				—				5.0	%
Interest rate sensitive liabilities:
Fixed rate obligations (c)		$	130			$	245			$	302			$	200,353			$	402			$	1,648			$	203,080			$	198,400
Average interest rate			5.1	%			5.1	%			5.1	%			5.2	%			13.1	%			13.3	%			5.2	%

Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

     The financial statements listed in Item 15 are filed as part of this report and are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.		Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

     None.

Item 9A.		Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

     Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2006 were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

     There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation referred to above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006. Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

Item 9B.		Other Information.

     None.

PART III

Item 10.		Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.

     Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2007. Reference is also made regarding the executive officers of the registrant to “Executive Officers of the Registrant” following Item 4 of Part I of this report.

Item 11.		Executive Compensation.

     Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2007.

Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

     Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2007.

     Equity Compensation Plan Information

     The table below sets forth information as of the end of our 2006 fiscal year for (i) all equity compensation plans approved by our shareholders and (ii) all equity compensation plans not approved by our shareholders:

Number of

securities

Number of

remaining

securities to

available for

be issued

Weighted-

future issuance

upon

average

under equity

exercise of

exercise

compensation

outstanding

price of

plans

options,

outstanding

(excluding

warrants

options,

securities

and

warrants

reflected in the

Plan category

rights

and rights

first column)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

751,555

$

475.51

207,695

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

1,930,963

$

231.42

198,926

Total

2,682,518

$

299.81

406,621

     Equity compensation plans approved by our shareholders include the the NVR, Inc. Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan; the NVR, Inc. 1998 Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan; the 1998 Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan; and the 2005 Stock Option Plan. Equity compensation plans that have not been approved by our shareholders include the NVR, Inc. 1994 Management Equity Incentive Plan and the NVR, Inc. 2000 Broadly-Based Stock Option Plan. See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of each of our equity compensation plans.

Item 13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

     Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2007.

Item 14.		Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

     Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2007.

PART IV

Item 15.		Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

     The following documents are filed as part of this report:

1.

Financial Statements

NVR, Inc. — Consolidated Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2.

Exhibits

Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of NVR, Inc. (“NVR”). Filed as Exhibit 2 to Amendment No. 1 to Form 8-A filed on June 14, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2		Bylaws, as amended, of NVR, Inc. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.1		Indenture dated as of April 14, 1998 between NVR, as issuer and the Bank of New York as trustee. Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to NVR’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 23, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.2		Form of Note (included in Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1).
4.3		Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 17, 2003, between NVR and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as successor to The Bank of New York, as trustee. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to NVR’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 17, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit
Number		Description
4.4		Form of Note (included in Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.3).
10.1*		Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dwight C. Schar dated July 1, 2005. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.2*		Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Paul C. Saville dated July 1, 2005. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.3*		Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dennis M. Seremet dated July 1, 2005. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.4*		Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and William J. Inman dated July 1, 2005. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.5*		Profit Sharing Plan of NVR, Inc. and Affiliated Companies. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-29241) filed June 13, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.6		Loan Agreement dated as of September 7, 1999 among NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (“NVR Finance”) and US Bank National Association, as Agent, and the other lenders party thereto. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.7*		Employee Stock Ownership Plan of NVR, Inc. Incorporated by reference to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1994.
10.8*		NVR, Inc. 1994 Management Equity Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit to NVR’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.9*		NVR, Inc. 1998 Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 4 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-79951) filed June 4, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.10*		NVR, Inc. 1998 Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 4 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-79949) filed June 4, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.11*		The Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the 1998 Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.12*		NVR, Inc. Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-04975) filed May 31, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit
Number		Description
10.13*		NVR, Inc. Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-04989) filed May 31, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.14*		NVR, Inc. 2000 Broadly-Based Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to NVR’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-56732) filed March 8, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.15*		The NVR, Inc. 2005 Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.18 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.16*		The Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2005 Stock Option Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.17*		NVR, Inc. High Performance Compensation Plan dated as of January 1, 1996. Filed as Exhibit 10.30 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.18*		NVR, Inc. High Performance Compensation Plan No. 2 dated as of January 1, 1999. Filed as Exhibit 10.31 to NVR’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.19*		NVR, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.20		Second Amendment to Loan Agreement and Second Amendment to Pledge and Security Agreement dated September 1, 2000 between NVR Finance and U.S. Bank National Association, as agent, and other Lenders party thereto. Filed as Exhibit 10.36 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.21		Agreement to increase commitments under the NVR Mortgage Finance Warehouse Facility by and among NVR Finance, Comerica Bank, National City Bank of Kentucky, and U.S. Bank National Association dated as of September 28, 2001. Filed as Exhibit 10.22 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.22		Eighth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of August 15, 2002 between NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, Guaranty Bank, Bank One, NA, Comerica Bank, National City Bank of Kentucky and JPMorgan Chase Bank. Filed as Exhibit 10.26 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.23		Ninth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of April 16, 2003 between NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, Guaranty Bank, Bank One, NA, Comerica Bank, National City Bank of Kentucky and JPMorgan Chase Bank. Filed as Exhibit 10.28 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit
Number		Description
10.24		Tenth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of August 28, 2003 between NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, Guaranty Bank, Bank One, NA, Comerica Bank, National City Bank of Kentucky and JPMorgan Chase Bank. Filed as Exhibit 10.29 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.25		Eleventh Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of August 26, 2004 between NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, Guaranty Bank, Comerica Bank, National City Bank of Kentucky and JPMorgan Chase Bank. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 27, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.26		Thirteenth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of August 25, 2005 between NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, Guaranty Bank, Comerica Bank, National City Bank of Kentucky and JPMorgan Chase Bank. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed August 25, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.27		Credit Agreement dated as of December 7, 2005 among NVR, Inc. and the lenders party hereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent, SunTrust Bank and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Documentation Agents, AmSouth Bank, Comerica Bank, Calyon New York Branch and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., as Managing Agents, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Sole Book Runner. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed December 12, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.28*		Description of the Board of Directors’ compensation arrangement. Filed as Exhibit 10.27 to NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.29*		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between NVR, Inc. and Dwight C. Schar dated December 21, 2006. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed December 22, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.30		Fifteenth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of August 24, 2006 between NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Guaranty Bank, Comerica Bank, National City Bank and Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed August 24, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.31		Commitment and Acceptance dated March 27, 2006 increasing the commitment under its existing revolving credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders that are parties thereto, dated December 7, 2005 by $45 million to an aggregate commitment of $445 million. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed March 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.32		Commitment and Acceptance dated August 16, 2006 increasing the commitment under its existing revolving credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders that are parties thereto, dated December 7, 2005 by $155 million to an aggregate commitment of $600 million. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NVR’s Form 8-K filed August 17, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.33*		Summary of 2007 Named Executive Officer annual incentive compensation plan. Filed herewith.
21		NVR, Inc. Subsidiaries. Filed herewith.
23		Consent of KPMG LLP (Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm). Filed herewith.

Exhibit
Number		Description
31.1		Certification of NVR’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). Filed herewith.
31.2		Certification of NVR’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). Filed herewith.
32		Certification of NVR’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature		Title		Date
/s/ Dwight C. Schar		Executive Chairman		February 21, 2007
Dwight C. Schar
/s/ C. Scott Bartlett, Jr.		Director		February 21, 2007
C. Scott Bartlett, Jr.
/s/ Robert C. Butler		Director		February 21, 2007
Robert C. Butler
/s/ Timothy M. Donahue		Director		February 21, 2007
Timothy M. Donahue
/s/ Manuel H. Johnson		Director		February 21, 2007
Manuel H. Johnson
/s/ William A. Moran		Director		February 21, 2007
William A. Moran
/s/ David A. Preiser		Director		February 21, 2007
David A. Preiser
/s/ George E. Slye		Director		February 21, 2007
George E. Slye
/s/ John M. Toups		Director		February 21, 2007
John M. Toups
/s/ Paul C. Saville		Principal Executive Officer		February 21, 2007
Paul C. Saville
/s/ Dennis M. Seremet		Principal Financial Officer		February 21, 2007
Dennis M. Seremet
/s/ Robert W. Henley		Principal Accounting Officer		February 21, 2007
Robert W. Henley

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
NVR, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in notes 1 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements, NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” effective January 1, 2006.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 21, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
February 21, 2007

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
NVR, Inc:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated February 21, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
February 21, 2007

NVR, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

		December 31,
		2006				2005
ASSETS
Homebuilding:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	551,738			$	170,090
Receivables			12,213				40,562
Inventory:
Lots and housing units, covered under sales agreements with customers			667,100				723,657
Unsold lots and housing units			58,248				60,419
Manufacturing materials and other			8,268				9,899
			733,616				793,975
Assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R			276,419				275,306
Property, plant and equipment, net			40,430				31,096
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets, net			41,580				41,580
Goodwill and indefinite life intangibles, net			11,686				11,686
Definite life intangibles, net			250				375
Contract land deposits, net			402,170				517,241
Deferred tax assets, net			169,901				97,511
Other assets			37,567				45,340
			2,277,570				2,024,762
Mortgage Banking:
Cash and cash equivalents			4,381				7,436
Mortgage loans held for sale, net			178,444				193,932
Property and equipment, net			1,168				1,003
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets, net			7,347				7,347
Other assets			4,898				3,189
			196,238				212,907
Total assets		$	2,473,808			$	2,237,669

(Continued)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

NVR, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

		December 31,
		2006				2005
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Homebuilding:
Accounts payable		$	273,936			$	262,086
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			225,178				276,702
Liabilities related to assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R			244,805				215,284
Obligations under incentive plans			40,045				60,555
Customer deposits			165,354				256,837
Other term debt			3,080				3,325
Senior notes			200,000				200,000
Notes payable			—				103,000
			1,152,398				1,377,789
Mortgage Banking:
Accounts payable and other liabilities			15,784				25,902
Notes payable			153,552				156,816
			169,336				182,718
Total liabilities			1,321,734				1,560,507
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 20,592,640 shares issued as of both December 31, 2006 and 2005			206				206
Additional paid-in-capital			585,438				473,886
Deferred compensation trust- 547,911 and 547,697 shares of NVR, Inc. common stock as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively			(80,491	)			(76,303	)
Deferred compensation liability			80,491				76,303
Retained earnings			3,196,040				2,608,628
Less treasury stock at cost — 15,075,113 and 14,964,482 shares as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively			(2,629,610	)			(2,405,558	)
Total shareholders’ equity			1,152,074				677,162
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	2,473,808			$	2,237,669

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

NVR, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data)

		Year Ended				Year Ended				Year Ended
		December 31, 2006				December 31, 2005				December 31, 2004
Homebuilding:
Revenues		$	6,036,236			$	5,177,743			$	4,247,503
Other income			13,609				6,301				2,655
Cost of sales			(4,701,265	)			(3,738,030	)			(3,156,286	)
Selling, general and administrative			(432,319	)			(345,525	)			(260,795	)
Operating income			916,261				1,100,489				833,077
Interest expense			(18,423	)			(13,809	)			(11,934	)
Homebuilding income			897,838				1,086,680				821,143
Mortgage Banking:
Mortgage banking fees			97,888				84,604				72,219
Interest income			7,704				5,014				4,249
Other income			1,334				1,435				1,075
General and administrative			(38,988	)			(31,555	)			(25,593	)
Interest expense			(2,805	)			(1,759	)			(1,088	)
Mortgage banking income			65,133				57,739				50,862
Income before taxes			962,971				1,144,419				872,005
Income tax expense			(375,559	)			(446,860	)			(348,801	)
Net income		$	587,412			$	697,559			$	523,204
Basic earnings per share		$	104.08			$	110.36			$	80.83
Diluted earnings per share		$	88.05			$	89.61			$	66.42
Basic weighted average shares outstanding			5,644				6,321				6,473
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding			6,672				7,784				7,877